|
|||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 6 sections are present. |
The article
Dead Space: Extraction you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Dead Space: Extraction for comments about the article, and
Talk:Dead Space: Extraction/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Tintor2 --
Tintor2 (
talk)
20:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
The article
Unicorn Overlord you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Unicorn Overlord for comments about the article, and
Talk:Unicorn Overlord/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Pokelego999 --
Pokelego999 (
talk)
16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
I feel that your quick-pass GA review of Vinland Saga missed a lot. I went to the article to do a quick review for DYK, and I found a lot of problems. A significant portion of the prose was incomprehensible or poorly paraphrased, there were neutrality issues (primary sources used in critical reception section), and copyvio (a 176-word quotation, in excess of fair use). There may be more problems that I missed. Please be careful and refrain from rubber-stamping reviews. Thanks. – Reidgreg ( talk) 13:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm sad to see you removing the GAN for 38 Studios yet again. Would you consider leaving the nomination open if I took care of fixing the reviewer's concerns on your behalf? IceWelder [ ✉] 14:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Sands of Destruction you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SnowFire --
SnowFire (
talk)
18:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
The article
Sands of Destruction you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Sands of Destruction for comments about the article, and
Talk:Sands of Destruction/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SnowFire --
SnowFire (
talk)
18:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
|
|||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 6 sections are present. |
The article
Dead Space: Extraction you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Dead Space: Extraction for comments about the article, and
Talk:Dead Space: Extraction/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Tintor2 --
Tintor2 (
talk)
20:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
The article
Unicorn Overlord you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Unicorn Overlord for comments about the article, and
Talk:Unicorn Overlord/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Pokelego999 --
Pokelego999 (
talk)
16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
I feel that your quick-pass GA review of Vinland Saga missed a lot. I went to the article to do a quick review for DYK, and I found a lot of problems. A significant portion of the prose was incomprehensible or poorly paraphrased, there were neutrality issues (primary sources used in critical reception section), and copyvio (a 176-word quotation, in excess of fair use). There may be more problems that I missed. Please be careful and refrain from rubber-stamping reviews. Thanks. – Reidgreg ( talk) 13:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm sad to see you removing the GAN for 38 Studios yet again. Would you consider leaving the nomination open if I took care of fixing the reviewer's concerns on your behalf? IceWelder [ ✉] 14:48, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Sands of Destruction you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SnowFire --
SnowFire (
talk)
18:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
The article
Sands of Destruction you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Sands of Destruction for comments about the article, and
Talk:Sands of Destruction/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SnowFire --
SnowFire (
talk)
18:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)