![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Special thanks for the strong support ! -- Tinu Cherian - 05:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
A request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee 2. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies.
Manning (
talk)
08:35, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
You received this message because you participated in the earlier
ArbCom secret ballot RFC.
Hello, only minutes after my creation of the page I noticed that it had been nominated for deletion. I've noticed your participation in a similar and invite you to comment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dr_Zhongjun_Cao
I voted to keep it as it is a notable as well as horrific event. Thanks ( Jimmy Heat ( talk) 12:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC))
Hello, only minutes after my creation of the page I noticed that it had been nominated for deletion. I've noticed your participation in a similar and invite you to comment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dr_Zhongjun_Cao
I voted to keep it as it is a notable as well as horrific event. Thanks ( Jimmy Heat ( talk) 12:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC))
As you participated in the recent
Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two
requests for comment that relate to the use of
SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the
SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (
talk)
08:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
See your page pop up again on my watchlist? - Spaceman Spiff 04:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
I just finished writing the Life section, previously we did not have RS apart from a book by AuthorHouse. Came across a really big, scholarly ( at least certified by Huston Smith ) on Varanasi. Do give a proof read after couple of days, after I finish my additions. Cheers, -- TheMandarin ( talk) 15:23, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
For your support.-- Nemonoman ( talk) 16:38, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
I received T.S. Rukmani's A critical study of the Bhagavata Purana, Chowkhamba Sanskrit Studies, from the library today (had even forgotten that I had requested it!). Looks very interesting and readable at first glance. Intend to read it over this month and add pertinent bits to the BP page (haven't really been "editing" for some time). Hope you are doing well, and that we'll see more of you around these parts. Cheers. Abecedare ( talk) 19:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
I've started this case on Avatar's discussion page u r welcome 115.252.34.64 ( talk) 21:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi ! On http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gayatri_mantra appears a significant update about the gayatri mantra. According to S. M. Hamsananda, (Le yoga de l'Amour dans la Force, nouvelles révélations, Albin Michel, 1990, 343 p., p. 215-226) quoted in the article, the mantra described and used untill now, know as the brahman's mantra is the Gayatri of the Iron Age (Kali Yuga) humanity has left in 1986 to enter in the Golden Age (Hiranya Yuga). The delivering of the new Gayatri of the Golden Age, remained secret untill now is also revealed, the translations, significations, and effects. The referring to Savitur is here, the changing part of the new mantra, replaced by "HAMSAH MANARAH MIRCHOAN", which meaning is close to the ancient one. This is no more referring to the Sun (Savitur) but, the Divine Breath (HAMSAH) of the Absolute (similar to the expanding breath of Brahma), of the Column of light MANARAH, (bridge between Celestial and Physical realms, between God and Humans) and Synthesis of God's lights as one (MIRCHOAN). So this still refers to the same thing, principle, but given an other name, according to a cosmic change of age (yuga). I think such an updates needs to be considered and the french wikipedia article be translated to complete this wiki english article (about the same subject !) Ishadawn ( talk) 22:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Can you take a look at this thing? It's more up your alley. I think this needs to be deleted as pure synthesis/OR, taking a few lines from the Mahabharata and blowing it out of proportions. What's your take? cheers. - Spaceman Spiff 07:03, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
As you have been involved in Salt Satyagraha and its talk page, I thought I'd invite your feedback on my suggestions about place names there. PMLawrence ( talk) 14:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Priyanth, thank you for your comments. They were helpful. The information I have added is well-known. The same information is also found in Bhakti Schools of Vedanta, by Swami Tapsyananda, although I don't have the book at hand. Please take a look at that book, http://www.vedanta.com/store/product75.html
The reference to Guna avatars is well known in Gaudiya theology. Links need not merely include books. A well-referenced web site can suffice in some cases. For example, historically, the information found in Western encylopedia sources such as Encarta have been weak. I have done the same with the article, Karma in Hinduism which is substantially my own because most Hindus mistakenly believe that karma is merely a law of cause and effect. So you can trust me.
Raj2004 ( talk) 14:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Priyanth, some people believe that websites are inferior sources of information. This is not the always the case. Some well-respected encylopedias such as Encarta, have poor sections on Hinduism. Some websites such as those sponsored by Himalayan Academy and Vedanta Press are very good authoritative websites. Some people may be not be aware of Himaylan Academy but those who know know it to be a reliable source! Please judge the information source, rather than the type of medium. Also please don't let one's personal bias or lack of information cloud you. I am not a believer of Dvaita but I inserted their follower's viewpoints to counter the Shaivite point of view on Narasimha and Sharbha in the avatar section.
Raj2004 (
talk)
16:40, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
I don't care what some people believe either. You are following your own point of view too. These sources are well-respected. Satguru sivaya subramuniyaswami of the Himayalan Academy was a well-respected Saivite scholar.
Thank you.
Raj2004 ( talk) 17:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Priyanth for adding those academic resources. I knew that avatar is not central to Saivism. I don't have access to the academic sources as you guys have. Raj2004 ( talk) 21:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Priyanth and best wishes for a happy and prosperous New Year. regards, Raj2004 ( talk) 19:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Priyanath,
Radiantenergy ( talk) 21:52, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Your input will be appreciated here, where an editor is contending that the mantra is not addressed to Savitr, because Brahmoism doesn't recognize devas. Abecedare ( talk) 20:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Your area of specialization -- Mahabharata. Can you take a look when you get on here sometime? Page was moved to Sura Kingdom and I reverted because the only refs I found on gbooks was the original title. cheers. - Spaceman Spiff 05:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
I took your advice on using Google Books. What a great resource!!! Please take a look at footnote 28 for Avatars of Shiva in the article on Avatar; I added this note, See section on Sri Vijayîndra Tîrtha, pg. 412 of A History of the Dvaita School of Vedanta and its literature, by B.N. Krishnamurti Sharma, available at http://books.google.com/books?id=FVtpFMPMulcC&pg=PA412&dq=Sarabha+dvaita&lr=&cd=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false
Thanks, Raj2004 ( talk) 00:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. As it fails many aspects of the GA criteria I have de-listed it. When the issues have been fixed, it can be renominated at WP:GAN. If you disagree with the reassessment you may ask for a community reassessment at WP:GAR. You can see the concerns at Talk:P. V. Narasimha Rao/GA1. Jezhotwells ( talk) 20:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Faith-based community, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith-based community. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kitfoxxe ( talk) 21:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 02:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
Looking forward to more contributions from you!
|
---|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Autobiographyofayogikrishna.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 21:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You may be aware that Collaboration of the Month has been revived by members of WP: India. For January 2012 there are 2 articles - Indian COTM - Premchand and Indian COTM for GA - Mahatma Gandhi. As a senior and respected editor you are requested to partake in this activity. Cheers, Around The Globe सत्यमेव जयते 15:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.
As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.
If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.
You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.
ssriram_mt ( talk) & AshLin ( talk) (Drive coordinators)
Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. The Helpful Bot 01:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Saffronart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:51, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dharasanasaltfactory.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Sir You are a fake. We would like to send legal action for your prominent role in deletion of Manu Shanker Mishra. We do understand people like you if real identity as disclosed by crime branch for your IP addresss is correct. Hoping for a respond.
Regards Nishant Kumar 122.176.217.230 ( talk) 18:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Special thanks for the strong support ! -- Tinu Cherian - 05:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
A request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee 2. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies.
Manning (
talk)
08:35, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
You received this message because you participated in the earlier
ArbCom secret ballot RFC.
Hello, only minutes after my creation of the page I noticed that it had been nominated for deletion. I've noticed your participation in a similar and invite you to comment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dr_Zhongjun_Cao
I voted to keep it as it is a notable as well as horrific event. Thanks ( Jimmy Heat ( talk) 12:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC))
Hello, only minutes after my creation of the page I noticed that it had been nominated for deletion. I've noticed your participation in a similar and invite you to comment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dr_Zhongjun_Cao
I voted to keep it as it is a notable as well as horrific event. Thanks ( Jimmy Heat ( talk) 12:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC))
As you participated in the recent
Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two
requests for comment that relate to the use of
SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the
SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (
talk)
08:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
See your page pop up again on my watchlist? - Spaceman Spiff 04:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
I just finished writing the Life section, previously we did not have RS apart from a book by AuthorHouse. Came across a really big, scholarly ( at least certified by Huston Smith ) on Varanasi. Do give a proof read after couple of days, after I finish my additions. Cheers, -- TheMandarin ( talk) 15:23, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
For your support.-- Nemonoman ( talk) 16:38, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
I received T.S. Rukmani's A critical study of the Bhagavata Purana, Chowkhamba Sanskrit Studies, from the library today (had even forgotten that I had requested it!). Looks very interesting and readable at first glance. Intend to read it over this month and add pertinent bits to the BP page (haven't really been "editing" for some time). Hope you are doing well, and that we'll see more of you around these parts. Cheers. Abecedare ( talk) 19:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
I've started this case on Avatar's discussion page u r welcome 115.252.34.64 ( talk) 21:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi ! On http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gayatri_mantra appears a significant update about the gayatri mantra. According to S. M. Hamsananda, (Le yoga de l'Amour dans la Force, nouvelles révélations, Albin Michel, 1990, 343 p., p. 215-226) quoted in the article, the mantra described and used untill now, know as the brahman's mantra is the Gayatri of the Iron Age (Kali Yuga) humanity has left in 1986 to enter in the Golden Age (Hiranya Yuga). The delivering of the new Gayatri of the Golden Age, remained secret untill now is also revealed, the translations, significations, and effects. The referring to Savitur is here, the changing part of the new mantra, replaced by "HAMSAH MANARAH MIRCHOAN", which meaning is close to the ancient one. This is no more referring to the Sun (Savitur) but, the Divine Breath (HAMSAH) of the Absolute (similar to the expanding breath of Brahma), of the Column of light MANARAH, (bridge between Celestial and Physical realms, between God and Humans) and Synthesis of God's lights as one (MIRCHOAN). So this still refers to the same thing, principle, but given an other name, according to a cosmic change of age (yuga). I think such an updates needs to be considered and the french wikipedia article be translated to complete this wiki english article (about the same subject !) Ishadawn ( talk) 22:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Can you take a look at this thing? It's more up your alley. I think this needs to be deleted as pure synthesis/OR, taking a few lines from the Mahabharata and blowing it out of proportions. What's your take? cheers. - Spaceman Spiff 07:03, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
As you have been involved in Salt Satyagraha and its talk page, I thought I'd invite your feedback on my suggestions about place names there. PMLawrence ( talk) 14:06, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Priyanth, thank you for your comments. They were helpful. The information I have added is well-known. The same information is also found in Bhakti Schools of Vedanta, by Swami Tapsyananda, although I don't have the book at hand. Please take a look at that book, http://www.vedanta.com/store/product75.html
The reference to Guna avatars is well known in Gaudiya theology. Links need not merely include books. A well-referenced web site can suffice in some cases. For example, historically, the information found in Western encylopedia sources such as Encarta have been weak. I have done the same with the article, Karma in Hinduism which is substantially my own because most Hindus mistakenly believe that karma is merely a law of cause and effect. So you can trust me.
Raj2004 ( talk) 14:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Priyanth, some people believe that websites are inferior sources of information. This is not the always the case. Some well-respected encylopedias such as Encarta, have poor sections on Hinduism. Some websites such as those sponsored by Himalayan Academy and Vedanta Press are very good authoritative websites. Some people may be not be aware of Himaylan Academy but those who know know it to be a reliable source! Please judge the information source, rather than the type of medium. Also please don't let one's personal bias or lack of information cloud you. I am not a believer of Dvaita but I inserted their follower's viewpoints to counter the Shaivite point of view on Narasimha and Sharbha in the avatar section.
Raj2004 (
talk)
16:40, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
I don't care what some people believe either. You are following your own point of view too. These sources are well-respected. Satguru sivaya subramuniyaswami of the Himayalan Academy was a well-respected Saivite scholar.
Thank you.
Raj2004 ( talk) 17:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Priyanth for adding those academic resources. I knew that avatar is not central to Saivism. I don't have access to the academic sources as you guys have. Raj2004 ( talk) 21:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Priyanth and best wishes for a happy and prosperous New Year. regards, Raj2004 ( talk) 19:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Priyanath,
Radiantenergy ( talk) 21:52, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
Your input will be appreciated here, where an editor is contending that the mantra is not addressed to Savitr, because Brahmoism doesn't recognize devas. Abecedare ( talk) 20:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Your area of specialization -- Mahabharata. Can you take a look when you get on here sometime? Page was moved to Sura Kingdom and I reverted because the only refs I found on gbooks was the original title. cheers. - Spaceman Spiff 05:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
I took your advice on using Google Books. What a great resource!!! Please take a look at footnote 28 for Avatars of Shiva in the article on Avatar; I added this note, See section on Sri Vijayîndra Tîrtha, pg. 412 of A History of the Dvaita School of Vedanta and its literature, by B.N. Krishnamurti Sharma, available at http://books.google.com/books?id=FVtpFMPMulcC&pg=PA412&dq=Sarabha+dvaita&lr=&cd=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false
Thanks, Raj2004 ( talk) 00:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. As it fails many aspects of the GA criteria I have de-listed it. When the issues have been fixed, it can be renominated at WP:GAN. If you disagree with the reassessment you may ask for a community reassessment at WP:GAR. You can see the concerns at Talk:P. V. Narasimha Rao/GA1. Jezhotwells ( talk) 20:37, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Faith-based community, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith-based community. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kitfoxxe ( talk) 21:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 02:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
Looking forward to more contributions from you!
|
---|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:04, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Autobiographyofayogikrishna.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 21:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You may be aware that Collaboration of the Month has been revived by members of WP: India. For January 2012 there are 2 articles - Indian COTM - Premchand and Indian COTM for GA - Mahatma Gandhi. As a senior and respected editor you are requested to partake in this activity. Cheers, Around The Globe सत्यमेव जयते 15:16, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.
As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.
If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.
You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.
ssriram_mt ( talk) & AshLin ( talk) (Drive coordinators)
Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. The Helpful Bot 01:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Saffronart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:51, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dharasanasaltfactory.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem ( talk) 02:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Sir You are a fake. We would like to send legal action for your prominent role in deletion of Manu Shanker Mishra. We do understand people like you if real identity as disclosed by crime branch for your IP addresss is correct. Hoping for a respond.
Regards Nishant Kumar 122.176.217.230 ( talk) 18:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)