Hello, Prince Godfather, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Deepu Joseph. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
![]() |
Links for Wikipedians interested in India content |
![]() |
Welcome kit
Register
Network
Contribute content
|
Hello, Thamizhan, I noticed your contributions to the Madhavan article. I removed the pictures you added again for several reasons: a) One pciture besides the main one is okay to show how he looks in his movies -- three are much to many, his article isn't even that long. It's an encyclopaedic article and not a fanpage. If you want to add more pictures, take Shahrukh Khan`s article as an example: There, we have three pictures: one, how he looks like now, the second how he looked like than years ago and one of him on the cover of a wolrd renowned magazine. If you have pictures (with copyright information) of Madhavan how he looked ten years ago or him featured on the India Times (Gossp Magazines don't count), why don't you add those? b) most of the picture violate copyrights. You have to find out who is copyright holder of the pictures (producer, distributor, production company - pick one of those). It's not enugh to simply tell from which movie they are and where you got them.
If you need any help with finding copyright information, don't hesitate and ask me. Best regards, -- Plumcouch 19:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Thamizhan, just noticed you replaced the Vijay picture in the actor-box on the upper right side of the article. Erm, problem is: I think those pictures on actor articles, especially, the very first one within the box should enable people to identify the actor. Currently, all I identify is the big, yellow bike Vijay is sitting on. Think you could find a pic which is more about his face? -- Plumcouch 17:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Thamizhan, the picture you uploaded to Ajith Kumar's article is violating copyright. There are notes within the picture's page which describe what the copyright violation entails. Copyright violation is taken very serious here at Wikipedia, so please stop adding the picture.
Also, please refrain from adding co-stars to the filmography. If you compare featured articles, like Eric Bana or Lindsay Lohan, you'll notice that they don't list their co-stars either. Those belong into the movies' articles. Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 17:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Pokiri is the spelling of the Telugu film and Pokkiri is the spelling of the tamil film (official titles; for Tamil film, see the official website as well). So, I'll delete the Pokiri, currently a disambiguation page and move the telugu film article there. I'll also move the tamil film article to Pokkiri. Pl. let me know if you have any objections. TIA, -- Gurubrahma 12:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey, nice to see you adding plenty of good stubs to the Wikipedia. Could you do me one favour, use {{Film-stub}} instead of {{stub}} because I'm stub-sorting and replacing all your stubs! Cheers! Budgiekiller 10:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry for putting a CSD template on her, since she appears to be notable. When creating your pages, though, would you be able to provide a bit more context on each actor/actress you're writing up. To someone like me who doesn't know a thing about Indian cinema in any language, they look non-notable and context-less when you write them up that quickly. BigHaz 12:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Thamizhan, about those noted roles:
Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 11:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
Abbas (actor), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are
notable. If you can indicate why Abbas (actor) is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on
Talk:Abbas (actor). Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read
our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under
Articles. You might also want to read
our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add
citations from
reliable sources to ensure that your article will be
verifiable. --
Daveydweeb (
chat/
patch) 11:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
You asked: "Hi, I'm User: Thamizhan but I'm not happy with my current user name - how can I change it without deleting my contributions?"
Hello, Thamizhan, Thanks a ton for the heads-up: I cleaned up the page - have a look - what do you think? If fangush is added once again, I'll request the article to be protected. Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 18:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi Thamizhan, I read many articles by u such as something something unnakam ennakam, vettaiyaadu vilaiyaadu, ghilli, and many more. I am not sure if it is u or not that is keep on adding false news about box office records info. if it is u, give a citation of where u got those records from. this is unreasonable. how can ghilli make more than Rs. 600 million?? only chandramukhi and Pokiri are the only 2 films which crossed the 40 crore mark. Please fix to all those sites u gave wrong information about or give a URL. Thanks a lot.-- Arjun1591 12 September 2006
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled " Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
Dep. Garcia 16:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
awarded in recognition of your contribution to Tamil Cinema. Doctor Bruno Talk 21:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC) |
You've moved the Jyothika Sadanah article twice now. Would you happen to have any references to the fact that she changed her surname? I didn't see any news item to that effect. Thanks!
BTW, a separate issue is that when you move an article, you should fix up double-redirects. See where Jyothika leads to. Ambarish 08:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, could you explain why you did the following?
I have to say that I can't figure out why it is you did this. --- Deville ( Talk) 02:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi Thamizhan. I appreciate your effort towards adding more content related to Kollywood. However, the Reema Sen image is copyrighted and can used under fair use only to illustrate the poster and not the person. If you have sufficient fair use rationale, feel free to add the rationale to the image description and readd the image. Otherwise, copyright patrol bots will delete the image anyway. Please read the policies that I've linked to in my text above. Thanks. -- Sundar \ talk \ contribs 07:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Thamizhan,
about Madhavan's notable roles: what qualifies them as "notable"? Isn't it a point of view if a role or a movie is notable? As for being friends with Aamir Khan and rest: could your cite a source? And it's not important if a courting was committed - how do you know that? They married - isn't that the only thing which is important? Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 17:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for contributing Tamil wikipedia. I appreciate if you could get user account-- Umapathy (உமாபதி) 13:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello Thamizhan
I thought i told you earlier that don't give false box office records and info unless you give a URL or a website. How in the world can Something Something Unakkam Enakkam gross 20 crores on opening day?????? Not even Bollywood blockbusters grossed that much. Please fix all the articles you have screwed up so that other viewers on Wikipedia will not be given false information.
Thanks,
I did not leave you any threat. I only told you to fix any articles by deleting the box office info or provide any URL supporting your edit. I did not leave you a threat for your information. Also i did not leave any pornographic picture. you can clearly see on other articles more explict than this. It is a still of Anusha from the film Super. If that bothers you, tell me so that i can change it. Last of all, why should i leave wikipedia? i am not harming anybody. wikipedia is my hobby and i love to spend my time on it. Arjun1591 14:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Before you tell me to fix all the pictures I uploadaed, first you should check on yourself to fix pictures with out licensing or summary such as pokkiri. also fix the Filmfare Awards South. You just copied and pasted. And your telling me that my information is not inappropriate? Arjun1591 21:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Thamizhan. As you probably noticed I removed parts of Ajith Kumar's filmography (director, co-stars) and the "Notable roles". I raised the issue about these to parts of articles in general at the Wikiproject Indian Cinema and got response from fellow editors. In order not to start an edit war, maybe you could contribute in the debate here [1], and maybe we find a solution acceptable for everyone. Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 14:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Template:The Seven World Wonders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MCB 18:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorry just so used to using the phrase ... didnt intend offence 222.155.21.111 19:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Thamizhan, about the "dubbed movies". I tried to insert the filmography without costars, and directors, as none of the featured actor pages include these. I tried to remove all dubbed movies which I recognized as such, but apparantly, I have not succeded. If I add the cleared filmography again, would you just remove the dubbed movies I have missed? Thanks a ton. Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 16:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your rating of the page. Could you please provide comments/reasons for the rating given to it? It would be helpful in improving the article. Cheers. Splashprince 10:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
This is with reference to the copyright laden images of cine artists. It is really nice to see more related images in the articles. However the following guidelines would help you to get the better off the images you are uploading...
Best wishes. I'll try to butt in, whenever i can. ;) -- Chez ( Discuss / Email) • 23:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, You have changed you have changed redirection of link janaki to S Janaki. But janaki means sita. I request you to create a disambiguation page instead. Thanks Lokesh 2000 03:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm really sorry about complaining about you to Yamla, but I requested an explanation as to why you kept reverting the page but you gave me nothing of the such. If that was the case, you should have just removed those sections from the article. Besides, I think the reader of that respective page has the right to know what the main actor or actress might be playing in the movie. Whatever's happenned, I truly am sorry for doing that. Next time, I will voice my complaints to you first before taking it somewhere else. Apologies. -- Hariharan91 04:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello Thamizhan, thanks a ton for the Barnstar. It's really appreciated. I agree about imroving Kamal Hassan's article - he *is* such a famous actor in India and definitely deserves to become featured. However, there is much to do on his article. I suggest the following:
What do you think? Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 13:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Can you please try to find the name of the other Rajni in the movie Doctor Bruno 23:28, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Thamizhan,
We welcome your nomination for assessment on R. Madhavan. The article has been rated B-Class. Please see the comments for the rating on the talk page. Happy Editing. Cheers. -- Ch e z ( Discuss / Email) • 22:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from any editing on the article Chiranjeevi. For your information, I did not talk in my point of view. I just gave facts. Arjun1591 22:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC
Hello;this is referring to the "Ban on Kollywood films" sections you've written in Tollywood article.This year more number of Telugu films were hits and only one film dubbed from Tamil(SANDAIKOZHI) was a hit.Comment on this.Barring 6 in 2005;tell me how many dubbed films of Tamil made money during 2002-2004 period?(Except Boys and Pitamagan).Success of dubbed films are a temporary phenomenon;when the local industry is in recession.For;when Kollywood was in recession during 2000 or 2001;more number of dubbed films were released than original Tamil ones and also made money!Stop trying to create discord among Indian users for flimsy reasons. Moreover; in many articles I've observed that in the name of removing Pov;you only add more of your POV. S.GaneshKumar 09:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Thamizhan, You wrote "STRONG DELETE per nom a whole lot of Muslim POV." on this AfD - would you mind clarifying what you meant? Cheers, Tewfik Talk 16:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
WTF you dont believe Nayantara is so fat?
Note Image:Babitakapoor.jpg says
It is believed that the use of a limited number of web-resolution screenshots
* for identification and critical commentary on the film and its contents * on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,
qualifies as fair use...... -- ArmadilloFromHell 18:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
As requested, I have renamed you as User:Prince Godfather. You should now move your userpages to the new name, and might like to recreate this account and request that it is blocked, to prevent impersonation. Warofdreams talk 00:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I have voted in Kamalhassan articles for improvement page. I am happy to see your contributions to Kollywood. I think we should try to make Kamalhassan page along with Sivaji,Ilayaraja,Rajiniganth pages to Featured articles level. Probably we can include Arunprasad,Ganesh,Dr.Bruno and others who are showing lot of interest in Tamil movies. -- Indianstar 12:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the note on my talk section. I haven't been able to substantiate the Dambachari (10 roles by a single person) 'record', with facts, and I would appreciate if there is some link you can refer to me to prove/refute it.
For articles on Indian persons, there seems to be a proclivity to make them hagiographies, rather than fact-based biographies. Whom are we trying to impress? As a prolific Wiki-user, what do you think of this trend of embellishing truths to make the personality look larger than life? Thanks. Sudar 14:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Articles you have created, notedly about the actor Madhavan such as Yaaravan Nalam, Aaval, Hello Zindagi and Ivan Yaaro have been nominated for deletion. If you want these articles remain, please provide concrete reasons as to why you feel they should remain on the following pages:
Thanks! -- Visual planet 12:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I have started subsection called Punch dialogues in Rajinikanth article. Can you update that list when you get time? -- Indianstar 13:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Awarded in recognition of your contribution to Tamil Cinema. User:Anwar saadat User:Anwar saadat |
A tag has been placed on Ivan Yaaro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's Criteria for deletion. If you can indicate how Ivan Yaaro is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{ hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Ivan Yaaro saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. GameKeeper 18:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey Prince. I just wanted to tell you, I think you should move the Aaval page to a page like Untitled Ram Gopal Varma Project or something of the sort. The title hasn't been confirmed yet and well, the link you provided, isn't really reliable because anyone could have posed as Madhavan. Regards -- Visual planet 10:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Did you know that you are number 2480 on this list? -- Jreferee 19:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you would redirect Madhavan to R. Madhavan when there are 5 different people with that name that have a Wikipedia article. At the very least, you should add a link to the dab page. You seem to be a fan of R. Madhavan but don't let it cloud your judgement: losing the link to Madhavan (disambiguation) is not helpful. Pascal.Tesson 00:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
It would be nice to know your stance on this vote [2] Anwar 16:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be very low:
Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! -- Kralizec! ( talk) 18:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
happy holidays to you too. I'll do my best to fill up the gaps in Kollywood and Tollywood. Idleguy 03:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I undid your changes to the (admittedly confusing) New Seven Wonders of the World article and Seven Wonders of the World disambig page. If you want to change them back - and you may be right, since there's no absolutely best way to be clear with two "events" of the same name but of quite different approaches - please bring it up on the New Seven Wonders talk page first; this has already been the subject of some discussion. - DavidWBrooks 21:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Godfather.Sure I will do the maximum .I can.I will as much films as I can. Harlowraman 16:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate your work and all but i prefer you made more Tamil films by Devayani.
Thanks Prince Godfather
Hi, thanks for your addition to the Production Section but could you please provide a source confirming that is true, otherwise I will be inclined to delete it. Thanks. Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 22:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Do you have some knowledge of Bollywood? You are currently crossing path with another editor who created article in masses, and I am trying to assertain how much reality and/or notability is in those articles. Agathoclea 19:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Ah, it's not a very good idea to use the Wikipedia mainspace as a sandbox (that's what we have user subpages for). I recommend that you work on the article at User:Prince Godfather/Jeans (film), so readers won't get confused into thinking that Jeans and V for Vendetta are the same movie. Cheers, Khoi khoi 00:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Happy new year King Dracula 12:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Please don't do this as it would be very confusing for people expecting to go to an airport article. Instead make it a disambiguation like this. You can read about them at Wikipedia:Disambiguation. Also I see this page is getting long and you might want to archive some of it. Take a look at Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
South Indian Cinema and Music Award
It is surprised to see that you have not got this barnstar so far. Your contributions to South Indian Cinema is extraordinary. Congratulations. Indianstar |
Hello Prince Godfather,
If you don't mind, I would like to know why you changed the title of the film Khatarnak to Mr. Khatarnak. Not anywhere on the logo does it say Mr. Khatarnak. Arjun1591 01:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Nice to see that you are getting more awards. You deserve these for your dedication and commitment towards enriching wikipedia contents.
"Leave me a message" in your user page takes to talk page of your old user name and even message left there is not getting reflected in your user pages.(Do you have any specific reason to retain it in that way?) Can you correct that to point to your user name. -- Indianstar 03:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
User:59.144.12.64 has heavily vandalised the Aalwar page, please may you see to him getting punished.
Thanks
Cheers
Pokkiri 18:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Prince: Thank you for taking interest in the Wikipedia article of Ilaiyaraaja. He certainly has made a lot of wonderful music. I added yesterday a whole new section to the article dedicated to Ilaiyaraaja song clips. I wonder if you could kindly check and see if the clips works on your computer, and if they sound clear and nice. I would also like you to tell me what you think about the song clips there. About Ajanta, it is really interesting to know that the maestro has composed 36 songs altogether for the project. It is quite an achievement. I think the statements that you added about this would more perfectly fit into a separate article on the film Ajanta. Maybe you can create it. I believe the interesting information you provided would best belong there. I truly appreciate you helping me with improving the Ilaiyaraaja article. I hope we can together make it into a Feature Article someday! (It is already an A-class article). AppleJuggler 01:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
An editor has nominated the article Abhay for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhay. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Abhay during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 17:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
There is a Request for Comment regarding Wikipedia administrator Yamla, located at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Yamla. If you believe you have anything to add, please consider doing so. Thank you. Justen 15:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Prince Godfather, I'm currently trying to imrpove Varalaru - History of Godfather - however I haven't seen the movie and I don't know Ajith Kumar's films very well; maybe you can help - so far the summary is still kinda messed up. Also, there are notes of a German release (among others) on that page - I didn't know Kumar's films are shown in Germany - do you have information on that or suggestion on how to verify that claim? (I have my doubts - earlier, it was written that the film got a "PG"-rating in Germany, however Germany rates with the FSK-System and not with the academy of motion pictures-system). Maybe you can have a look? Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 22:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. Happy editing :) Cookie90 09:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering how to become an aadministrator?
please tell me
Czesc26
Don't change the redirect from Madhavan, you have already had it explained to you why here User_talk:Prince_Godfather#Madhavan. GameKeeper 18:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry, this is really out of my league. I wish I could help. You may want to see WP:DISPUTE. I'm pretty sure you already know about the requirement to cite using reliable sources, etc. etc., but those links may be useful for you. -- Yamla 21:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Please learn to give atleast one source for articles you create. Do not remove the tags. Anwar 11:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
If the source is available only on print media, scan it and upload the image to a free server and duplicate the link with tinyurl.org. Then give that shortcut here. Anwar 12:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
OK I will talk to you for one last time. You voted unfairly the Aalwar - opening for deletion even though I produced almost a dozen links. Nee enna periya paruppa? Naan un vishayathil thalyidatha podhu nee edhuku kannu mookai nulaikkirey. Anwar 12:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Did you really have to do what you did to Ganguly family (films)? In you haste to reinstate a blatantly copyvio gallery, which was earlier removed from the article, you removed painstakingly sourced and rationalized images of the subject. Now those images have been deleted from database for being orphaned. And, in doing so you also reinstated loads of mis-spellings that other editors have corrected bit by bit.
Did you really have to do it? All that from a winner of all those barnstars and a protector against vandalism! I am surprised, pained and really shocked. Could you, please, explain your behavior to my talk page? Aditya Kabir 13:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
i know i did a good job anyway i'm sure manikanda will be released before april and seethakalyanam's shooting is over, now it has some financial problems so it will be released as soon as possible.
Ideally you should talk to him about it, and raise it on WP:ANI so that admins can take a closer look at his history and block him. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
hi this is lisa from Bangalore,India.not quite sure you are the movie actor maddy or not.pls confirm as i am doing an assignment reguarding your page in wikipedia. thanks. regards, lisa
Hello Prince Godfather,
I have deleted box office information of the article Citizen (film) but it seems that you have again placed it back. May I ask why you are doing this? Please provide a link to back you up. Thanks. Arjun1591 18:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I think it would be a good Idea not to use WP:LOW form for Bollywood actors and basically for all actors because People prefer it to be vice-versa compared to the format it is following now and I did read the section regarding Filmography in WP:LOW and it doesnt say anything about that method applying for Films. When new Films are added new users and anons find it hard to add it to the list because they dont know how to and I have just finished Fixing the Filmography section for Shah Rukh Khan. Somebody should fix this problem as soon a possible becoz it is slowly by slowly becoming a problem..Cheers..-- Cometstyles 16:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
The images you have uploaded recently;
Can you correct. GameKeeper 23:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I nominated an article you created for deletion. You might be interested to drop by to give your opinion. Cheers! -- lucasbfr talk 12:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello Prince Godfather..How r u? Can you tell me how to add copyright to a picture and text..pls thankxx
Thankx Prince
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from an article, as you did at Filmfare Best Actress Award (Tamil). Only the administrator who closes the AfD may remove this notice. Thanks! Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 12:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thankx Prince well i like ur user page too u r doing a great job.
Thanks for uploading Image:Shriyanew.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈ talk 23:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi
I've noticed that you and me seem to be making a lot of edits to the article on Ishaa Koppikar. Rather than keep cancelling each others' work out maybe it would be better to agree on a few things so that we can make this article 100%.
I've got a few suggestsions, which I want to run by you to see what you think.
1 - Let's keep the unreleased films in the filmography and state that they're unreleased. Anyone wanting to know what films Ishaa has made need to know the unreleased ones as well as the released ones and so long as it's made clear what the film's status is there should be no mix ups.
2 - Can we clarify once and for all that the main image on the article is not from Don. It's on the cover of my Dharma the Warrior dvd, bought from Nehaflix. I know dvds can be released years after the film comes out, but I've seen that image on the internet long before Don was being promoted.
3 - The main article text needs a tidy up. No changes, just a few alterations to make it read smoother: eg The film, shot in London and Chenai, became a commercial blockbuster on release and won the lead actors rave reviews. That kind of thing.
4 - If Qayamat is a noteable role (nominated Best Vilain), shouldn't Kyaa Kool Hai Hum be a notable role too (nominated Best Comedy performance) rather than Don.
Let me know what you think.
Regards -- Chris750 19:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
You added copyright info to this image, [3] Which is blatently copyied from this image [4]
The 'reply' from the company is just too similar to be anything other than a copy and paste. Do you have any explanation. GameKeeper 16:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Yours sincerely,
Prince Godfather 20:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Prince Godfather ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Re-check my edits and their notability
Decline reason:
This is enough for a permanent block without other reasoning (which would also be enough for a block). Goodbye. — 〈 RED VEЯS〉 21:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please note that this user has admitted to being an abusive sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user. Also, this block has been reviewed by at least three other administrators and found to be appropriate. Please see The discussion on WP:ANI. A decision to unblock should not be taken lightly. -- Yamla 21:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Prince Godfather 21:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
This is even worse than I thought. You admit to being an abusive sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user, Prin ( talk · contribs). As such, you were already not permitted to edit the Wikipedia. And your comments above do not in any way address your fraudulent falsification of OTRS permission information which is the proximate reason this account has been blocked. Your block has been reviewed by multiple administrators. Your deliberate attempt to place Wikipedia in legal jeopardy by making fraudulent claims about image licensing permissions has left us with no option but to block you indefinitely. We will most likely have to go back and revert all of your edits made with this account. I am stunned and disappointed at your reprehensible actions and your apparent willingness to harm the Wikipedia. -- Yamla 21:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Please, I beg of you to unblock me, I promise never to upload an image again if it means of me getting unblocked, its because I really enjoy editing Wikipedia, and many other editors have praised me due to this. Most of my edits have been significant and worthy. Eg. R. Madhavan article which I brought from a Stub to a GE and as said by User:Derek.cashman it could become FA! Yamla, I feel you know what I feel like at the moment - heartbroken for doing nothing, and finding out after a tiring day back from an expedition - knackered. If you insist on blocking me, do so for a day or a week - but not indefinitely please! Then I'll be depressed. Not being rude, I feel depressed :(. Hope you can reply in the positive to my sorry pleas. Prince Godfather 22:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Prince Godfather ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Redvers has no proof,, that those were fake, those were real images. I have done nothing bad. Why don't people understand me. I feel absolutely knackered. :-(
Decline reason:
It is a serious violation of copyright to suggest that there were OTRS tickets for any images. If there were, someone else who is affiliated with WP:OTRS would have tagged them.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 23:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Prince Godfather ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
But adminstrators it is real, there is no evidence that it is fake, if you sk me, I'll show you proof, but at the moment I seem to be blocked for no reason.
Decline reason:
Yamla has given sufficient proof that you have been fooling wikipedia all along. And please see Wikipedia:No legal threats. Due to your abuse of the unblock tool and due to your legal threat, I am locking this page. — Aksi_great ( talk) 12:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is proof for your blocking. You uploaded images and claimed that they had permission stored in an OTRS ticket. I had someone with access to this database look up the information and this was shown to be blatantly false. You have yet to explain why you falsified this information. Additionally, you created this account to get around a block placed on Prin ( talk · contribs) and as such were never entitled to edit using this account. Either of these actions is sufficient to warrant an indefinite block. That you did both means we will no longer entertain unblock requests. -- Yamla 22:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I reviewed your article on R. Madhavan and found that it looks great. There are a couple of minor tweaks to fix, so I left notes on the article's talk page regarding this (mainly, the article needs references/citations for a few unsourced sections). Fix these few things, and I think the article is ready for GA status. Cheers! Dr. Cash 20:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of top Tollywood films, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top Tollywood films. Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Template:Harrow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 06:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Oram Po, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Oram Po.
Guy (
Help!) 16:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Veeru Potla, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Black Kite 17:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently,
Koffee with Anu, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's
notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be
merged,
redirected, or
deleted. Please consider adding
reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:
"Koffee with Anu" –
news ·
books ·
scholar ·
JSTOR ·
free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia!
VoxelBot 01:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
The article Vedant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Derek Andrews (
talk) 19:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Silandhi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Wgolf (
talk) 02:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
The article Koffee with DD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk) 03:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramprakash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramprakash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nerd1a4i ( talk) 18:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiran Rathod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Rathod until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon ( talk) 14:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Suman Setty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PageImp ( talk) 17:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The redirect
Yogi(film) has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § Yogi(film) until a consensus is reached.
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 04:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Prince Godfather, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Deepu Joseph. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
![]() |
Links for Wikipedians interested in India content |
![]() |
Welcome kit
Register
Network
Contribute content
|
Hello, Thamizhan, I noticed your contributions to the Madhavan article. I removed the pictures you added again for several reasons: a) One pciture besides the main one is okay to show how he looks in his movies -- three are much to many, his article isn't even that long. It's an encyclopaedic article and not a fanpage. If you want to add more pictures, take Shahrukh Khan`s article as an example: There, we have three pictures: one, how he looks like now, the second how he looked like than years ago and one of him on the cover of a wolrd renowned magazine. If you have pictures (with copyright information) of Madhavan how he looked ten years ago or him featured on the India Times (Gossp Magazines don't count), why don't you add those? b) most of the picture violate copyrights. You have to find out who is copyright holder of the pictures (producer, distributor, production company - pick one of those). It's not enugh to simply tell from which movie they are and where you got them.
If you need any help with finding copyright information, don't hesitate and ask me. Best regards, -- Plumcouch 19:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Thamizhan, just noticed you replaced the Vijay picture in the actor-box on the upper right side of the article. Erm, problem is: I think those pictures on actor articles, especially, the very first one within the box should enable people to identify the actor. Currently, all I identify is the big, yellow bike Vijay is sitting on. Think you could find a pic which is more about his face? -- Plumcouch 17:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Thamizhan, the picture you uploaded to Ajith Kumar's article is violating copyright. There are notes within the picture's page which describe what the copyright violation entails. Copyright violation is taken very serious here at Wikipedia, so please stop adding the picture.
Also, please refrain from adding co-stars to the filmography. If you compare featured articles, like Eric Bana or Lindsay Lohan, you'll notice that they don't list their co-stars either. Those belong into the movies' articles. Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 17:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Pokiri is the spelling of the Telugu film and Pokkiri is the spelling of the tamil film (official titles; for Tamil film, see the official website as well). So, I'll delete the Pokiri, currently a disambiguation page and move the telugu film article there. I'll also move the tamil film article to Pokkiri. Pl. let me know if you have any objections. TIA, -- Gurubrahma 12:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey, nice to see you adding plenty of good stubs to the Wikipedia. Could you do me one favour, use {{Film-stub}} instead of {{stub}} because I'm stub-sorting and replacing all your stubs! Cheers! Budgiekiller 10:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Sorry for putting a CSD template on her, since she appears to be notable. When creating your pages, though, would you be able to provide a bit more context on each actor/actress you're writing up. To someone like me who doesn't know a thing about Indian cinema in any language, they look non-notable and context-less when you write them up that quickly. BigHaz 12:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Thamizhan, about those noted roles:
Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 11:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
Abbas (actor), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are
notable. If you can indicate why Abbas (actor) is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on
Talk:Abbas (actor). Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read
our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under
Articles. You might also want to read
our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{
hangon}}
to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add
citations from
reliable sources to ensure that your article will be
verifiable. --
Daveydweeb (
chat/
patch) 11:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
You asked: "Hi, I'm User: Thamizhan but I'm not happy with my current user name - how can I change it without deleting my contributions?"
Hello, Thamizhan, Thanks a ton for the heads-up: I cleaned up the page - have a look - what do you think? If fangush is added once again, I'll request the article to be protected. Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 18:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi Thamizhan, I read many articles by u such as something something unnakam ennakam, vettaiyaadu vilaiyaadu, ghilli, and many more. I am not sure if it is u or not that is keep on adding false news about box office records info. if it is u, give a citation of where u got those records from. this is unreasonable. how can ghilli make more than Rs. 600 million?? only chandramukhi and Pokiri are the only 2 films which crossed the 40 crore mark. Please fix to all those sites u gave wrong information about or give a URL. Thanks a lot.-- Arjun1591 12 September 2006
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled " Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.
Dep. Garcia 16:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
awarded in recognition of your contribution to Tamil Cinema. Doctor Bruno Talk 21:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC) |
You've moved the Jyothika Sadanah article twice now. Would you happen to have any references to the fact that she changed her surname? I didn't see any news item to that effect. Thanks!
BTW, a separate issue is that when you move an article, you should fix up double-redirects. See where Jyothika leads to. Ambarish 08:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, could you explain why you did the following?
I have to say that I can't figure out why it is you did this. --- Deville ( Talk) 02:33, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi Thamizhan. I appreciate your effort towards adding more content related to Kollywood. However, the Reema Sen image is copyrighted and can used under fair use only to illustrate the poster and not the person. If you have sufficient fair use rationale, feel free to add the rationale to the image description and readd the image. Otherwise, copyright patrol bots will delete the image anyway. Please read the policies that I've linked to in my text above. Thanks. -- Sundar \ talk \ contribs 07:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Thamizhan,
about Madhavan's notable roles: what qualifies them as "notable"? Isn't it a point of view if a role or a movie is notable? As for being friends with Aamir Khan and rest: could your cite a source? And it's not important if a courting was committed - how do you know that? They married - isn't that the only thing which is important? Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 17:41, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for contributing Tamil wikipedia. I appreciate if you could get user account-- Umapathy (உமாபதி) 13:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello Thamizhan
I thought i told you earlier that don't give false box office records and info unless you give a URL or a website. How in the world can Something Something Unakkam Enakkam gross 20 crores on opening day?????? Not even Bollywood blockbusters grossed that much. Please fix all the articles you have screwed up so that other viewers on Wikipedia will not be given false information.
Thanks,
I did not leave you any threat. I only told you to fix any articles by deleting the box office info or provide any URL supporting your edit. I did not leave you a threat for your information. Also i did not leave any pornographic picture. you can clearly see on other articles more explict than this. It is a still of Anusha from the film Super. If that bothers you, tell me so that i can change it. Last of all, why should i leave wikipedia? i am not harming anybody. wikipedia is my hobby and i love to spend my time on it. Arjun1591 14:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Before you tell me to fix all the pictures I uploadaed, first you should check on yourself to fix pictures with out licensing or summary such as pokkiri. also fix the Filmfare Awards South. You just copied and pasted. And your telling me that my information is not inappropriate? Arjun1591 21:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Thamizhan. As you probably noticed I removed parts of Ajith Kumar's filmography (director, co-stars) and the "Notable roles". I raised the issue about these to parts of articles in general at the Wikiproject Indian Cinema and got response from fellow editors. In order not to start an edit war, maybe you could contribute in the debate here [1], and maybe we find a solution acceptable for everyone. Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 14:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Template:The Seven World Wonders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MCB 18:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorry just so used to using the phrase ... didnt intend offence 222.155.21.111 19:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Thamizhan, about the "dubbed movies". I tried to insert the filmography without costars, and directors, as none of the featured actor pages include these. I tried to remove all dubbed movies which I recognized as such, but apparantly, I have not succeded. If I add the cleared filmography again, would you just remove the dubbed movies I have missed? Thanks a ton. Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 16:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your rating of the page. Could you please provide comments/reasons for the rating given to it? It would be helpful in improving the article. Cheers. Splashprince 10:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
This is with reference to the copyright laden images of cine artists. It is really nice to see more related images in the articles. However the following guidelines would help you to get the better off the images you are uploading...
Best wishes. I'll try to butt in, whenever i can. ;) -- Chez ( Discuss / Email) • 23:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, You have changed you have changed redirection of link janaki to S Janaki. But janaki means sita. I request you to create a disambiguation page instead. Thanks Lokesh 2000 03:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm really sorry about complaining about you to Yamla, but I requested an explanation as to why you kept reverting the page but you gave me nothing of the such. If that was the case, you should have just removed those sections from the article. Besides, I think the reader of that respective page has the right to know what the main actor or actress might be playing in the movie. Whatever's happenned, I truly am sorry for doing that. Next time, I will voice my complaints to you first before taking it somewhere else. Apologies. -- Hariharan91 04:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello Thamizhan, thanks a ton for the Barnstar. It's really appreciated. I agree about imroving Kamal Hassan's article - he *is* such a famous actor in India and definitely deserves to become featured. However, there is much to do on his article. I suggest the following:
What do you think? Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 13:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Can you please try to find the name of the other Rajni in the movie Doctor Bruno 23:28, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Thamizhan,
We welcome your nomination for assessment on R. Madhavan. The article has been rated B-Class. Please see the comments for the rating on the talk page. Happy Editing. Cheers. -- Ch e z ( Discuss / Email) • 22:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from any editing on the article Chiranjeevi. For your information, I did not talk in my point of view. I just gave facts. Arjun1591 22:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC
Hello;this is referring to the "Ban on Kollywood films" sections you've written in Tollywood article.This year more number of Telugu films were hits and only one film dubbed from Tamil(SANDAIKOZHI) was a hit.Comment on this.Barring 6 in 2005;tell me how many dubbed films of Tamil made money during 2002-2004 period?(Except Boys and Pitamagan).Success of dubbed films are a temporary phenomenon;when the local industry is in recession.For;when Kollywood was in recession during 2000 or 2001;more number of dubbed films were released than original Tamil ones and also made money!Stop trying to create discord among Indian users for flimsy reasons. Moreover; in many articles I've observed that in the name of removing Pov;you only add more of your POV. S.GaneshKumar 09:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Thamizhan, You wrote "STRONG DELETE per nom a whole lot of Muslim POV." on this AfD - would you mind clarifying what you meant? Cheers, Tewfik Talk 16:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
WTF you dont believe Nayantara is so fat?
Note Image:Babitakapoor.jpg says
It is believed that the use of a limited number of web-resolution screenshots
* for identification and critical commentary on the film and its contents * on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,
qualifies as fair use...... -- ArmadilloFromHell 18:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
As requested, I have renamed you as User:Prince Godfather. You should now move your userpages to the new name, and might like to recreate this account and request that it is blocked, to prevent impersonation. Warofdreams talk 00:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I have voted in Kamalhassan articles for improvement page. I am happy to see your contributions to Kollywood. I think we should try to make Kamalhassan page along with Sivaji,Ilayaraja,Rajiniganth pages to Featured articles level. Probably we can include Arunprasad,Ganesh,Dr.Bruno and others who are showing lot of interest in Tamil movies. -- Indianstar 12:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the note on my talk section. I haven't been able to substantiate the Dambachari (10 roles by a single person) 'record', with facts, and I would appreciate if there is some link you can refer to me to prove/refute it.
For articles on Indian persons, there seems to be a proclivity to make them hagiographies, rather than fact-based biographies. Whom are we trying to impress? As a prolific Wiki-user, what do you think of this trend of embellishing truths to make the personality look larger than life? Thanks. Sudar 14:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Articles you have created, notedly about the actor Madhavan such as Yaaravan Nalam, Aaval, Hello Zindagi and Ivan Yaaro have been nominated for deletion. If you want these articles remain, please provide concrete reasons as to why you feel they should remain on the following pages:
Thanks! -- Visual planet 12:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I have started subsection called Punch dialogues in Rajinikanth article. Can you update that list when you get time? -- Indianstar 13:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Awarded in recognition of your contribution to Tamil Cinema. User:Anwar saadat User:Anwar saadat |
A tag has been placed on Ivan Yaaro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's Criteria for deletion. If you can indicate how Ivan Yaaro is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{ hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Ivan Yaaro saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. GameKeeper 18:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey Prince. I just wanted to tell you, I think you should move the Aaval page to a page like Untitled Ram Gopal Varma Project or something of the sort. The title hasn't been confirmed yet and well, the link you provided, isn't really reliable because anyone could have posed as Madhavan. Regards -- Visual planet 10:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Did you know that you are number 2480 on this list? -- Jreferee 19:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you would redirect Madhavan to R. Madhavan when there are 5 different people with that name that have a Wikipedia article. At the very least, you should add a link to the dab page. You seem to be a fan of R. Madhavan but don't let it cloud your judgement: losing the link to Madhavan (disambiguation) is not helpful. Pascal.Tesson 00:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
It would be nice to know your stance on this vote [2] Anwar 16:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be very low:
Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! -- Kralizec! ( talk) 18:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
happy holidays to you too. I'll do my best to fill up the gaps in Kollywood and Tollywood. Idleguy 03:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi - I undid your changes to the (admittedly confusing) New Seven Wonders of the World article and Seven Wonders of the World disambig page. If you want to change them back - and you may be right, since there's no absolutely best way to be clear with two "events" of the same name but of quite different approaches - please bring it up on the New Seven Wonders talk page first; this has already been the subject of some discussion. - DavidWBrooks 21:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Godfather.Sure I will do the maximum .I can.I will as much films as I can. Harlowraman 16:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate your work and all but i prefer you made more Tamil films by Devayani.
Thanks Prince Godfather
Hi, thanks for your addition to the Production Section but could you please provide a source confirming that is true, otherwise I will be inclined to delete it. Thanks. Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 22:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Do you have some knowledge of Bollywood? You are currently crossing path with another editor who created article in masses, and I am trying to assertain how much reality and/or notability is in those articles. Agathoclea 19:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Ah, it's not a very good idea to use the Wikipedia mainspace as a sandbox (that's what we have user subpages for). I recommend that you work on the article at User:Prince Godfather/Jeans (film), so readers won't get confused into thinking that Jeans and V for Vendetta are the same movie. Cheers, Khoi khoi 00:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Happy new year King Dracula 12:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Please don't do this as it would be very confusing for people expecting to go to an airport article. Instead make it a disambiguation like this. You can read about them at Wikipedia:Disambiguation. Also I see this page is getting long and you might want to archive some of it. Take a look at Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
South Indian Cinema and Music Award
It is surprised to see that you have not got this barnstar so far. Your contributions to South Indian Cinema is extraordinary. Congratulations. Indianstar |
Hello Prince Godfather,
If you don't mind, I would like to know why you changed the title of the film Khatarnak to Mr. Khatarnak. Not anywhere on the logo does it say Mr. Khatarnak. Arjun1591 01:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Nice to see that you are getting more awards. You deserve these for your dedication and commitment towards enriching wikipedia contents.
"Leave me a message" in your user page takes to talk page of your old user name and even message left there is not getting reflected in your user pages.(Do you have any specific reason to retain it in that way?) Can you correct that to point to your user name. -- Indianstar 03:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
User:59.144.12.64 has heavily vandalised the Aalwar page, please may you see to him getting punished.
Thanks
Cheers
Pokkiri 18:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Prince: Thank you for taking interest in the Wikipedia article of Ilaiyaraaja. He certainly has made a lot of wonderful music. I added yesterday a whole new section to the article dedicated to Ilaiyaraaja song clips. I wonder if you could kindly check and see if the clips works on your computer, and if they sound clear and nice. I would also like you to tell me what you think about the song clips there. About Ajanta, it is really interesting to know that the maestro has composed 36 songs altogether for the project. It is quite an achievement. I think the statements that you added about this would more perfectly fit into a separate article on the film Ajanta. Maybe you can create it. I believe the interesting information you provided would best belong there. I truly appreciate you helping me with improving the Ilaiyaraaja article. I hope we can together make it into a Feature Article someday! (It is already an A-class article). AppleJuggler 01:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
An editor has nominated the article Abhay for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhay. Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Abhay during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 17:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
There is a Request for Comment regarding Wikipedia administrator Yamla, located at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Yamla. If you believe you have anything to add, please consider doing so. Thank you. Justen 15:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Prince Godfather, I'm currently trying to imrpove Varalaru - History of Godfather - however I haven't seen the movie and I don't know Ajith Kumar's films very well; maybe you can help - so far the summary is still kinda messed up. Also, there are notes of a German release (among others) on that page - I didn't know Kumar's films are shown in Germany - do you have information on that or suggestion on how to verify that claim? (I have my doubts - earlier, it was written that the film got a "PG"-rating in Germany, however Germany rates with the FSK-System and not with the academy of motion pictures-system). Maybe you can have a look? Best regards, -- Plumcouch Talk2Me 22:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. Happy editing :) Cookie90 09:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering how to become an aadministrator?
please tell me
Czesc26
Don't change the redirect from Madhavan, you have already had it explained to you why here User_talk:Prince_Godfather#Madhavan. GameKeeper 18:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry, this is really out of my league. I wish I could help. You may want to see WP:DISPUTE. I'm pretty sure you already know about the requirement to cite using reliable sources, etc. etc., but those links may be useful for you. -- Yamla 21:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Please learn to give atleast one source for articles you create. Do not remove the tags. Anwar 11:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
If the source is available only on print media, scan it and upload the image to a free server and duplicate the link with tinyurl.org. Then give that shortcut here. Anwar 12:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
OK I will talk to you for one last time. You voted unfairly the Aalwar - opening for deletion even though I produced almost a dozen links. Nee enna periya paruppa? Naan un vishayathil thalyidatha podhu nee edhuku kannu mookai nulaikkirey. Anwar 12:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Did you really have to do what you did to Ganguly family (films)? In you haste to reinstate a blatantly copyvio gallery, which was earlier removed from the article, you removed painstakingly sourced and rationalized images of the subject. Now those images have been deleted from database for being orphaned. And, in doing so you also reinstated loads of mis-spellings that other editors have corrected bit by bit.
Did you really have to do it? All that from a winner of all those barnstars and a protector against vandalism! I am surprised, pained and really shocked. Could you, please, explain your behavior to my talk page? Aditya Kabir 13:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
i know i did a good job anyway i'm sure manikanda will be released before april and seethakalyanam's shooting is over, now it has some financial problems so it will be released as soon as possible.
Ideally you should talk to him about it, and raise it on WP:ANI so that admins can take a closer look at his history and block him. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
hi this is lisa from Bangalore,India.not quite sure you are the movie actor maddy or not.pls confirm as i am doing an assignment reguarding your page in wikipedia. thanks. regards, lisa
Hello Prince Godfather,
I have deleted box office information of the article Citizen (film) but it seems that you have again placed it back. May I ask why you are doing this? Please provide a link to back you up. Thanks. Arjun1591 18:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I think it would be a good Idea not to use WP:LOW form for Bollywood actors and basically for all actors because People prefer it to be vice-versa compared to the format it is following now and I did read the section regarding Filmography in WP:LOW and it doesnt say anything about that method applying for Films. When new Films are added new users and anons find it hard to add it to the list because they dont know how to and I have just finished Fixing the Filmography section for Shah Rukh Khan. Somebody should fix this problem as soon a possible becoz it is slowly by slowly becoming a problem..Cheers..-- Cometstyles 16:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
The images you have uploaded recently;
Can you correct. GameKeeper 23:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I nominated an article you created for deletion. You might be interested to drop by to give your opinion. Cheers! -- lucasbfr talk 12:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello Prince Godfather..How r u? Can you tell me how to add copyright to a picture and text..pls thankxx
Thankx Prince
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from an article, as you did at Filmfare Best Actress Award (Tamil). Only the administrator who closes the AfD may remove this notice. Thanks! Seraphimblade Talk to me Please review me! 12:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thankx Prince well i like ur user page too u r doing a great job.
Thanks for uploading Image:Shriyanew.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈ talk 23:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi
I've noticed that you and me seem to be making a lot of edits to the article on Ishaa Koppikar. Rather than keep cancelling each others' work out maybe it would be better to agree on a few things so that we can make this article 100%.
I've got a few suggestsions, which I want to run by you to see what you think.
1 - Let's keep the unreleased films in the filmography and state that they're unreleased. Anyone wanting to know what films Ishaa has made need to know the unreleased ones as well as the released ones and so long as it's made clear what the film's status is there should be no mix ups.
2 - Can we clarify once and for all that the main image on the article is not from Don. It's on the cover of my Dharma the Warrior dvd, bought from Nehaflix. I know dvds can be released years after the film comes out, but I've seen that image on the internet long before Don was being promoted.
3 - The main article text needs a tidy up. No changes, just a few alterations to make it read smoother: eg The film, shot in London and Chenai, became a commercial blockbuster on release and won the lead actors rave reviews. That kind of thing.
4 - If Qayamat is a noteable role (nominated Best Vilain), shouldn't Kyaa Kool Hai Hum be a notable role too (nominated Best Comedy performance) rather than Don.
Let me know what you think.
Regards -- Chris750 19:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
You added copyright info to this image, [3] Which is blatently copyied from this image [4]
The 'reply' from the company is just too similar to be anything other than a copy and paste. Do you have any explanation. GameKeeper 16:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Yours sincerely,
Prince Godfather 20:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Prince Godfather ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Re-check my edits and their notability
Decline reason:
This is enough for a permanent block without other reasoning (which would also be enough for a block). Goodbye. — 〈 RED VEЯS〉 21:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please note that this user has admitted to being an abusive sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user. Also, this block has been reviewed by at least three other administrators and found to be appropriate. Please see The discussion on WP:ANI. A decision to unblock should not be taken lightly. -- Yamla 21:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Prince Godfather 21:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
This is even worse than I thought. You admit to being an abusive sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user, Prin ( talk · contribs). As such, you were already not permitted to edit the Wikipedia. And your comments above do not in any way address your fraudulent falsification of OTRS permission information which is the proximate reason this account has been blocked. Your block has been reviewed by multiple administrators. Your deliberate attempt to place Wikipedia in legal jeopardy by making fraudulent claims about image licensing permissions has left us with no option but to block you indefinitely. We will most likely have to go back and revert all of your edits made with this account. I am stunned and disappointed at your reprehensible actions and your apparent willingness to harm the Wikipedia. -- Yamla 21:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Please, I beg of you to unblock me, I promise never to upload an image again if it means of me getting unblocked, its because I really enjoy editing Wikipedia, and many other editors have praised me due to this. Most of my edits have been significant and worthy. Eg. R. Madhavan article which I brought from a Stub to a GE and as said by User:Derek.cashman it could become FA! Yamla, I feel you know what I feel like at the moment - heartbroken for doing nothing, and finding out after a tiring day back from an expedition - knackered. If you insist on blocking me, do so for a day or a week - but not indefinitely please! Then I'll be depressed. Not being rude, I feel depressed :(. Hope you can reply in the positive to my sorry pleas. Prince Godfather 22:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Prince Godfather ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Redvers has no proof,, that those were fake, those were real images. I have done nothing bad. Why don't people understand me. I feel absolutely knackered. :-(
Decline reason:
It is a serious violation of copyright to suggest that there were OTRS tickets for any images. If there were, someone else who is affiliated with WP:OTRS would have tagged them.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 23:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Prince Godfather ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
But adminstrators it is real, there is no evidence that it is fake, if you sk me, I'll show you proof, but at the moment I seem to be blocked for no reason.
Decline reason:
Yamla has given sufficient proof that you have been fooling wikipedia all along. And please see Wikipedia:No legal threats. Due to your abuse of the unblock tool and due to your legal threat, I am locking this page. — Aksi_great ( talk) 12:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is proof for your blocking. You uploaded images and claimed that they had permission stored in an OTRS ticket. I had someone with access to this database look up the information and this was shown to be blatantly false. You have yet to explain why you falsified this information. Additionally, you created this account to get around a block placed on Prin ( talk · contribs) and as such were never entitled to edit using this account. Either of these actions is sufficient to warrant an indefinite block. That you did both means we will no longer entertain unblock requests. -- Yamla 22:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
I reviewed your article on R. Madhavan and found that it looks great. There are a couple of minor tweaks to fix, so I left notes on the article's talk page regarding this (mainly, the article needs references/citations for a few unsourced sections). Fix these few things, and I think the article is ready for GA status. Cheers! Dr. Cash 20:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of top Tollywood films, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top Tollywood films. Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Template:Harrow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.
Thanks. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 06:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Oram Po, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Oram Po.
Guy (
Help!) 16:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Veeru Potla, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Black Kite 17:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently,
Koffee with Anu, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's
notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be
merged,
redirected, or
deleted. Please consider adding
reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:
"Koffee with Anu" –
news ·
books ·
scholar ·
JSTOR ·
free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia!
VoxelBot 01:32, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
The article Vedant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Derek Andrews (
talk) 19:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Silandhi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Wgolf (
talk) 02:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
The article Koffee with DD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sportsfan 1234 (
talk) 03:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramprakash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramprakash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nerd1a4i ( talk) 18:45, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiran Rathod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Rathod until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon ( talk) 14:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Suman Setty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PageImp ( talk) 17:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The redirect
Yogi(film) has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § Yogi(film) until a consensus is reached.
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 04:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)