There is no consensus that Bernier tweets is a controversy. If you want to make your point clear. Use the the talk page.
https://www.guelphmercury.com/news-story/8845640-bernier-controversy-boosts-liberal-coffers/ https://globalnews.ca/video/4392898/scheer-responds-to-berniers-controversial-tweets
There is a consensus that this is a controversy that has sparked a national debate on diversity and multiculturalism, and should be part of a new section, that elaborates further on this issue. :P PresidentCoriolanus ( talk) 19:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
I mean Bernier talk page so that other users can comment on it.
True but we are in an edit battle and your also removed a tweet that Bernier sent out and thats why I am asking for it. I just do not want this to be an edit war. Also do you think it should be its own wikipage so it will allow both perspectives on it.
I suggest you check the National clip to see the Charlottesville comment. However, the skepticism of Bernier against multiculturalism might be because of langauge mishap. He responded to the term in an ipolitics article " https://ipolitics.ca/2017/03/15/maxime-bernier-says-hes-been-ready-to-run-for-years/". Also, it might be a Quebec thing: "Quebec differs from the rest of the nine provinces in that its policy focuses on interculturalism, which is referred to support for cross-cultural dialogue and challenging self-segregation tendencies within cultures- rather than multiculturalism" I also suggest you avoid using your feeling towards Bernier when making your view based on some of the words I have read.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Settler colonialism. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. nableezy - 05:54, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 05:54, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally editors must be logged-in have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. These restrictions also apply to internal project discussions such as RMs, RFCs, project noticeboards, and merger and split threads, etc. Iskandar323 ( talk) 10:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no consensus that Bernier tweets is a controversy. If you want to make your point clear. Use the the talk page.
https://www.guelphmercury.com/news-story/8845640-bernier-controversy-boosts-liberal-coffers/ https://globalnews.ca/video/4392898/scheer-responds-to-berniers-controversial-tweets
There is a consensus that this is a controversy that has sparked a national debate on diversity and multiculturalism, and should be part of a new section, that elaborates further on this issue. :P PresidentCoriolanus ( talk) 19:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
I mean Bernier talk page so that other users can comment on it.
True but we are in an edit battle and your also removed a tweet that Bernier sent out and thats why I am asking for it. I just do not want this to be an edit war. Also do you think it should be its own wikipage so it will allow both perspectives on it.
I suggest you check the National clip to see the Charlottesville comment. However, the skepticism of Bernier against multiculturalism might be because of langauge mishap. He responded to the term in an ipolitics article " https://ipolitics.ca/2017/03/15/maxime-bernier-says-hes-been-ready-to-run-for-years/". Also, it might be a Quebec thing: "Quebec differs from the rest of the nine provinces in that its policy focuses on interculturalism, which is referred to support for cross-cultural dialogue and challenging self-segregation tendencies within cultures- rather than multiculturalism" I also suggest you avoid using your feeling towards Bernier when making your view based on some of the words I have read.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Settler colonialism. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. nableezy - 05:54, 18 August 2023 (UTC) 05:54, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Additionally editors must be logged-in have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert on the same page within 24 hours for pages within this topic. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. These restrictions also apply to internal project discussions such as RMs, RFCs, project noticeboards, and merger and split threads, etc. Iskandar323 ( talk) 10:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC)