Welcome to Rohit's Talk | ||||
|
Welcome!
Hello, Poet009, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Abecedare (
talk)
21:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Cyberwit press requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
ttonyb (
talk)
06:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
07:13, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
We had an edit conflict when I was trying to fix the article at the same time you were nominating for AfD. The AfD. consequently got messed up technically, so i placed it myself, & wrote what I think are your reasons for deletion--please take a look and comment if you like--you should probably add a formal delete vote, Myself, I support keeping it, and said so. I agree it was originally a very poor grade repetitious and somewhat promotional article. DGG ( talk ) 16:36, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Dear DGG, yes I understand that but anything written like this without any reliable references indicate just promotion.Thank you.Have a good day.-- Poet009 ( talk) 17:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, when you nominate an article for deletion make sure to do everything listed by the template that appears. That includes listing articles on the deletion page and notifying the article creator. Please check WP:AFDHOWTO as a reminder. I fixed your recent nominations. Hekerui ( talk) 19:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Please note that it is considered bad form to solicit one-sided !votes in deletion discussions (or any other discussion really), see WP:CANVASS. I haven't had a chance to read the AFD in detail but will probably have future comments if you're interested. The discussion itself will probably end with the page being kept (inappropriately in my mind) but you can never take that personally, that's how process and consensus works. A molehill is being made into a mighty mountain over there and I think Shawn in Montreal is going way overboard considering everyone has to make mistakes to learn - so please don't be discouraged by the biting. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 00:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I'm reading through the discussion at the Nabila Jamshed AFD and have some comments for you. They're basically my opinion as an experienced editor, and might help you out in future such discussions. Feel free to ignore them, but I do think they'll help you understand some of the issues you've ran into.
On a "positive" note, DGG has !voted delete. I respect DGG's opinion, and he's a librarian (I think). But ultimately the result will depend on the closing admin. But either way, the outcome is up to the community - who will often disagree with you. As I've said before, meh. You have to accept the result irrespective the outcome, unless you want to take it to WP:DRV.
Final comment - if you wanted to, I've written an essay for new editors at User:WLU/Generic sandbox on the mores of the community (in my experience). You may find it interesting and it's a summary I still find accurate several years later. As I've said, feel free to ignore it. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 12:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
I declined speedy deletion of this user page because {{ db-author}} did not apply. {{ db-author}} means that the author of the page has requested its deletion, and he hasn't. If you meant that the user is not a notable author, you can request deletion at WP:MFD instead, but personally I would prefer just to leave the user page alone. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
17:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Considering how much experience you clearly have of notability issues, speedy deletions etc, your comments on my talk page show wilful ignorance. You self-description made me smile. You claim to have zero-tolerance for self-promotion - and then feel the need to qualify it. Apparently in your world it's OK to self-promote if you really are important. Sadly for you, that's not the way it works - as I'm sure you know perfectly well. Your endless self-promotion is transparent, laughable and embarrassing. I'm just sorry you're wasting so many people's time with it.
I've invented poetic forms too. I have self-published too. My books have been praised too. So what? I'm just as obscure and unimportant as you are! When you have a real review - one you haven't written yourself and copied to hundreds of obscure magazines, in fact when you have many such real reviews, then you have a claim to notability. When your invented poetic form is taken up by others and starts being taught in poetry classes; when it becomes the subject of independent comment in respected poetry journals, then you can claim notability for it. But even then, you are not the one to write about it in Wikipedia. No doubt you think your aliases are fooling people. We're not that stupid. And as for the circular self-promotion deal you have going with your friend in Canada... my advice: choose a better poet! Her poetry is terrible.
I do sincerely wish you well with your poetry. I also understand very well the need for self-promotion - but why try to do it here where it is so clearly unwelcome? Put your time and effort into other approaches that will cause you and others less stress and might sell more of your books. Tesspub ( talk) 08:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
03:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
User:Poet009/Sonnet mondal, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Poet009/Sonnet mondal and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Poet009/Sonnet mondal during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SheepNotGoats ( talk) 15:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Rohit's Talk | ||||
|
Welcome!
Hello, Poet009, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Abecedare (
talk)
21:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Cyberwit press requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
ttonyb (
talk)
06:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
07:13, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
We had an edit conflict when I was trying to fix the article at the same time you were nominating for AfD. The AfD. consequently got messed up technically, so i placed it myself, & wrote what I think are your reasons for deletion--please take a look and comment if you like--you should probably add a formal delete vote, Myself, I support keeping it, and said so. I agree it was originally a very poor grade repetitious and somewhat promotional article. DGG ( talk ) 16:36, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Dear DGG, yes I understand that but anything written like this without any reliable references indicate just promotion.Thank you.Have a good day.-- Poet009 ( talk) 17:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, when you nominate an article for deletion make sure to do everything listed by the template that appears. That includes listing articles on the deletion page and notifying the article creator. Please check WP:AFDHOWTO as a reminder. I fixed your recent nominations. Hekerui ( talk) 19:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Please note that it is considered bad form to solicit one-sided !votes in deletion discussions (or any other discussion really), see WP:CANVASS. I haven't had a chance to read the AFD in detail but will probably have future comments if you're interested. The discussion itself will probably end with the page being kept (inappropriately in my mind) but you can never take that personally, that's how process and consensus works. A molehill is being made into a mighty mountain over there and I think Shawn in Montreal is going way overboard considering everyone has to make mistakes to learn - so please don't be discouraged by the biting. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 00:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I'm reading through the discussion at the Nabila Jamshed AFD and have some comments for you. They're basically my opinion as an experienced editor, and might help you out in future such discussions. Feel free to ignore them, but I do think they'll help you understand some of the issues you've ran into.
On a "positive" note, DGG has !voted delete. I respect DGG's opinion, and he's a librarian (I think). But ultimately the result will depend on the closing admin. But either way, the outcome is up to the community - who will often disagree with you. As I've said before, meh. You have to accept the result irrespective the outcome, unless you want to take it to WP:DRV.
Final comment - if you wanted to, I've written an essay for new editors at User:WLU/Generic sandbox on the mores of the community (in my experience). You may find it interesting and it's a summary I still find accurate several years later. As I've said, feel free to ignore it. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 12:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
I declined speedy deletion of this user page because {{ db-author}} did not apply. {{ db-author}} means that the author of the page has requested its deletion, and he hasn't. If you meant that the user is not a notable author, you can request deletion at WP:MFD instead, but personally I would prefer just to leave the user page alone. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
17:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Considering how much experience you clearly have of notability issues, speedy deletions etc, your comments on my talk page show wilful ignorance. You self-description made me smile. You claim to have zero-tolerance for self-promotion - and then feel the need to qualify it. Apparently in your world it's OK to self-promote if you really are important. Sadly for you, that's not the way it works - as I'm sure you know perfectly well. Your endless self-promotion is transparent, laughable and embarrassing. I'm just sorry you're wasting so many people's time with it.
I've invented poetic forms too. I have self-published too. My books have been praised too. So what? I'm just as obscure and unimportant as you are! When you have a real review - one you haven't written yourself and copied to hundreds of obscure magazines, in fact when you have many such real reviews, then you have a claim to notability. When your invented poetic form is taken up by others and starts being taught in poetry classes; when it becomes the subject of independent comment in respected poetry journals, then you can claim notability for it. But even then, you are not the one to write about it in Wikipedia. No doubt you think your aliases are fooling people. We're not that stupid. And as for the circular self-promotion deal you have going with your friend in Canada... my advice: choose a better poet! Her poetry is terrible.
I do sincerely wish you well with your poetry. I also understand very well the need for self-promotion - but why try to do it here where it is so clearly unwelcome? Put your time and effort into other approaches that will cause you and others less stress and might sell more of your books. Tesspub ( talk) 08:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
03:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
User:Poet009/Sonnet mondal, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Poet009/Sonnet mondal and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Poet009/Sonnet mondal during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SheepNotGoats ( talk) 15:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)