I reverted your edits to Patrick Moore (environmentalist). To me, some of it violated WP:NPOV and some of it was assertion of fact without citations. There was no edit comment or talk entry to support your edit on this very contentious article. Also, your edit removed some useful wikification and bloated the introduction with biographical details.
That said, it looked like there was some valuable content there. I would like you to consider renewing your edits in smaller portions, with references, and with edit comments and/or talk comments. You may also want to put something on your user page asserting that you are not, in fact, Patrick Moore himself, despite your username.
As you may know, Patrick Moore is a very controversial person. People have very strong opinions about him and are very sensitive of comments that paint him as hero or villain. In all likelihood, your edits would have soon been reverted with an angry response. If you don't believe me, reinstate your edits to see what happens. I will leave them alone.
If you'd like some help reworking your edits, let me know. I'll try to help. I'd have reworked them some instead of reverting them tonight, but I don't have a lot of time to give the Wikipedia right now. — BozoTheScary ( talk) 05:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Patrick Moore (environmentalist), you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Falcon8765 (TALK) 22:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Patrick Moore (environmentalist) constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content without explanation. Thank you.
Falcon8765
(TALK)
23:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Patrick Moore (environmentalist). If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing.
Falcon8765
(TALK)
23:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Patrick Moore (environmentalist).
Falcon8765
(TALK)
23:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
A thread has been started that may be relevant to you at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Patrick_Moore_.28environmentalist.29. Falcon8765 (TALK) 23:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I have blocked your account and thus you can not participate in the above discussion. Please post your comments here. Wikipedia is a collaborative project where it is obligatory at some point to start communicating with other editors and explain your changes. Your edits to Patrick Moore have raised several concerns of not adhering to WP:NPOV, WP:COI and WP:REF policies which have to be resolved before continuing to edit that article. Materialscientist ( talk) 23:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Please unblock me as I will abide by the rules. My failure to do so was not done on purpose, I did not understand what was happening when my edits were reverted. I will begin with editing my CV only.
Hello, Pmoore2222. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bueller 007 ( talk) 02:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi
it has been suggested that Pmooregreenspirit and Greenspiritman are other accounts you have used previously... is this correct, and regardless, are there any other accounts you have created? Andrewa ( talk) 00:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
In addition to the two pings above I have now posted explicit notices at the two relevant user talk pages. [1] [2]
Please note the policy on this: It is recommended that contributors not use multiple accounts without good reason... It is recommended that multiple accounts be identified as such on their user pages... The use of multiple accounts outside of established policy for doing so is known as sock puppetry, and is not permitted. (... shows text I have omitted for brevity.)
I appreciate that these other accounts have not been used for some years, and that you may no longer have access to them, but they should still be identified as your accounts if that is the case. Andrewa ( talk) 14:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
NedFausa (
talk)
21:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
I reverted your edits to Patrick Moore (environmentalist). To me, some of it violated WP:NPOV and some of it was assertion of fact without citations. There was no edit comment or talk entry to support your edit on this very contentious article. Also, your edit removed some useful wikification and bloated the introduction with biographical details.
That said, it looked like there was some valuable content there. I would like you to consider renewing your edits in smaller portions, with references, and with edit comments and/or talk comments. You may also want to put something on your user page asserting that you are not, in fact, Patrick Moore himself, despite your username.
As you may know, Patrick Moore is a very controversial person. People have very strong opinions about him and are very sensitive of comments that paint him as hero or villain. In all likelihood, your edits would have soon been reverted with an angry response. If you don't believe me, reinstate your edits to see what happens. I will leave them alone.
If you'd like some help reworking your edits, let me know. I'll try to help. I'd have reworked them some instead of reverting them tonight, but I don't have a lot of time to give the Wikipedia right now. — BozoTheScary ( talk) 05:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Patrick Moore (environmentalist), you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Falcon8765 (TALK) 22:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
The
recent edit you made to
Patrick Moore (environmentalist) constitutes
vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content without explanation. Thank you.
Falcon8765
(TALK)
23:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Patrick Moore (environmentalist). If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing.
Falcon8765
(TALK)
23:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Patrick Moore (environmentalist).
Falcon8765
(TALK)
23:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
A thread has been started that may be relevant to you at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Patrick_Moore_.28environmentalist.29. Falcon8765 (TALK) 23:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I have blocked your account and thus you can not participate in the above discussion. Please post your comments here. Wikipedia is a collaborative project where it is obligatory at some point to start communicating with other editors and explain your changes. Your edits to Patrick Moore have raised several concerns of not adhering to WP:NPOV, WP:COI and WP:REF policies which have to be resolved before continuing to edit that article. Materialscientist ( talk) 23:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Please unblock me as I will abide by the rules. My failure to do so was not done on purpose, I did not understand what was happening when my edits were reverted. I will begin with editing my CV only.
Hello, Pmoore2222. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bueller 007 ( talk) 02:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi
it has been suggested that Pmooregreenspirit and Greenspiritman are other accounts you have used previously... is this correct, and regardless, are there any other accounts you have created? Andrewa ( talk) 00:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
In addition to the two pings above I have now posted explicit notices at the two relevant user talk pages. [1] [2]
Please note the policy on this: It is recommended that contributors not use multiple accounts without good reason... It is recommended that multiple accounts be identified as such on their user pages... The use of multiple accounts outside of established policy for doing so is known as sock puppetry, and is not permitted. (... shows text I have omitted for brevity.)
I appreciate that these other accounts have not been used for some years, and that you may no longer have access to them, but they should still be identified as your accounts if that is the case. Andrewa ( talk) 14:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
NedFausa (
talk)
21:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)