![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, I know you meant well but Amazon and Barnes and Noble cannot be used in a article like this. The article will fail with sources like that. Do not add them back. Cheers.--( NGG) 13:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, the article, Feature model, has been edited by experts in the field and cites research conducted by themselves. As such it has been reported to the conflict of interest noticeboard: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Feature_model. Could you take a look at and make suggestions to whether it is notable to the COI discussion as I (and others) have absolutely no idea what the article is about? Thanks a lot. Smartse ( talk) 15:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
The aforementioned article uses British English as standard. Therefore, I have reverted your edit and changed your "honors" back to "honours". – Pee Jay 16:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 22:41, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Extremepro ( talk) 10:27, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 11:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 11:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Sure, I'll take a look. – Juliancolton | Talk 09:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Sounds good. :) – Juliancolton | Talk 09:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
This seems a bit quiet - were you not able to come up with the support!? :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/ (Desk) 09:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Done –
Juliancolton |
Talk
10:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 12:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
You might have noticed that you have come close to violating the three revert rule in the talk page of User:219.74.32.135. Be careful. Pmlinediter Talk 08:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 11:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 13:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Extremepro ( talk) 13:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
The article is getting better. Cheers, Wassupwestcoast ( talk) 02:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi! I've fixed the dead links and removed uncited content. Is there anything else that I need to do?-- HereToHelp ( talk to me) 21:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:721109Edward Cullen 3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 23:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 13:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 13:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 13:47, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 13:52, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my
"RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (
Ceoil,
Noroton and
Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read
Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record. ~~~~~ |
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:JacobBlack.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 16:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 11:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 11:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Just letting you know I have joined the task force for Percy Jackson.-- Airplaneman ( talk) 22:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, I know you meant well but Amazon and Barnes and Noble cannot be used in a article like this. The article will fail with sources like that. Do not add them back. Cheers.--( NGG) 13:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, the article, Feature model, has been edited by experts in the field and cites research conducted by themselves. As such it has been reported to the conflict of interest noticeboard: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Feature_model. Could you take a look at and make suggestions to whether it is notable to the COI discussion as I (and others) have absolutely no idea what the article is about? Thanks a lot. Smartse ( talk) 15:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
The aforementioned article uses British English as standard. Therefore, I have reverted your edit and changed your "honors" back to "honours". – Pee Jay 16:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 22:41, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Extremepro ( talk) 10:27, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 11:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 11:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Sure, I'll take a look. – Juliancolton | Talk 09:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Sounds good. :) – Juliancolton | Talk 09:39, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
This seems a bit quiet - were you not able to come up with the support!? :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/ (Desk) 09:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Done –
Juliancolton |
Talk
10:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 12:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
You might have noticed that you have come close to violating the three revert rule in the talk page of User:219.74.32.135. Be careful. Pmlinediter Talk 08:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 11:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 13:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Extremepro ( talk) 13:00, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
The article is getting better. Cheers, Wassupwestcoast ( talk) 02:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi! I've fixed the dead links and removed uncited content. Is there anything else that I need to do?-- HereToHelp ( talk to me) 21:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:721109Edward Cullen 3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 23:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 13:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 13:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 13:47, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 13:52, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my
"RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (
Ceoil,
Noroton and
Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read
Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record. ~~~~~ |
![]() |
Thanks for uploading Image:JacobBlack.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 16:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 11:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
--( NGG) 11:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Just letting you know I have joined the task force for Percy Jackson.-- Airplaneman ( talk) 22:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)