I looked at both, and noted a vast difference in tone and volubility between his Talk page interaction and his Edit summaries. Frankly, he was marginally more convincing in his edit summaries..
But I wasn't saying he was right, just that it's unusual for 3RR violators to defend their edits so much.-- Vercalos 10:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Hej Plrk. Thank you for contacting me. I prefer not to comment on the disputed content of the article, as it's not my area of expertise. However, I see that there's an edit war going on. If it continues, I may protect the article (or you may request protection on WP:RPP) so that consensus may be achieved on the talk page without continuous warring. Regards.-- Hús ö nd 20:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Do you agree to accept me as your mediator in Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Christian Democracy? Alan.ca 02:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
"Why screw around with the ToC?"
Because if one does one does not get that big, stupid, useless blank big right eating up half the page in the middle of one's browser when the page loads.
Is is some new Wiki law not to? Why else was the template made? If it is used at the top then it clashes with the other tags. Placed where it is text flows nicely about it. Simple.
195.82.106.244 07:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
I have opened the case, Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Swedish Anarcho-syndicalist Youth Federation on the mediation cabal. Do you wish to proceed with the mediation with me as your mediator? Alan.ca 08:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Sam Spade 13:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia. I've visited it a couple times, but never really tried editing until now. I wanted to know why exactly you consider me adding The HeadCrab Union on the Half-Life 2 page advertising. It's a place for all Valve games and mods. Is there some reason that it doesn't deserve to be listed along with the other fan sites? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by sentinelrv ( talk • contribs).
This author has had more than enough time to assert notability, and the article should be {{db-web}}ed, not {{notability}}ed.
Pumeleon
T
03:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Nevermind. I see that you saw it.
Pumeleon
T
03:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your comment on Talk:Chicken#Swimming? and just had to ask: you listened to Trafiktrolles kassettradio when you were younger, didn't you? // 74.56.91.108 04:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. I have approved your request and you should now be able to use the AWB application. Be sure to check every edit before you save it, and don't forget to check out the AWB Guide. You can get any help you need over on the AWB talk page. Feel free to contact me with any questions, Alphachimp 05:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Why do you put that box around yourself? Do you condone drinking alcohol and smoking cigarettes as opposed to hash, pot and whatevers even more potent? On the one side i take it you want to ligitimize what you do drink or smoke as opposed to whats "wrong" or "evil" or "against the law" or "bad for ones health" and on the other side you are ligitimizing government control on 2 sides: The first is giving citizens some drugs that they can use, so that many doesnt get too angry about not having their after-work drink or the "i got to go get a cigarette" break. The other is creating a small minority of criminals to make sure that the many can say "Iam not an addict, iam a good, iam right" so to keep them going and working for the state and the capital, whats worth anything to people with power. This last one also makes sure the police and the different government bodys got an extra job.
Anyhow smoking cigarettes affect other people as opposed to joints which is rarely smoken around lots of people and even if its hard on one self putting needles in ones arm its hardly something which attack other people on their physical health. Taken in this perspective alcohol is probably the worst of them all as that above anything else (not even speed) effects the level of aggression!
Why do you have to put that badge on yourself? Making yourself better than the people who have problems doesnt make their situation any better! Its alienation! My body is filled with drugs, and what the fuck is your problem with that! -- Fjulle 16:42, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
I did not come to Wikipedia to discuss anarchism and alcohol. However, I will reply - later, when I have some time without anything better to do. Further, I would like to point out that by the statement above I wanted to claim that the personal liberty of Fjulle's political beliefs is a hoax - not that I believe in forced collectivization. And for the record, I still haven't said I want to illegalize drugs. Nor do I want to illegalize drugs. For the other parts, see my coming post. Plrk ( Talk ° contribs) 19:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
In Anarchism, I noted that " Communistic experiments are said to both require and result in greater central control (i.e. the Soviet Politbureau and the Five year plan)." If the USSR doesn't provide sufficient proof, I am willing to elaborate. JLMadrigal 12:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw you crop the information of local news of Nashik on page Nashik. I can't guess the reason behind it. So please keep the links of "Local News of Nashik". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.0.45 ( talk • contribs)
"Comital" is an English adjective meaning "pertaining to a count", and not necessarily a typo for "committal". Choess 17:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
hi,
Some of them are internal links and I disagree this move. I am reverting that change. Please explain me If u decide to re revert it. spacejuncky 05:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey, will you take trouble and explain me why list of educational institutions are removed. Afterall They are linked to internal wiki pages??
Please explain. spacejuncky 12:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Mr. Plrk don't force your personal opinion on 'Nashik community'(Are you from Nashik?). Links of 'Local News of Nashik' are informative to related people of Nashik City. If you are disagree with this leave it as it is. This is not your personal page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.95.7.238 ( talk • contribs).
Take a look at government simulation game. I've essentially rewritten the article and added some strong references. I think you'll agree that this article establishes notability and is now well-sourced. There could still be a lot more information added, but I think this is adequate to get started. Tarinth 02:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
OK I'll bite.. how come you prod-tagged nearly all the Covenant albums except Dreams of a Cryotank and Europa? Did you think those two were somehow more notable? The articles for those don't seem any more detailed than the rest. Or did you intend to prod-tag them all? -- Vossanova o< 13:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm concerned you may be taking the issue of fictional characters issue too seriously. Cruft has always been an issue on Wikipedia, but it is also important to recognize the cultural value of fictional characters. The names of Han Solo and Jean-Luc Picard are so reknowned throughout the English-speaking world, it would seem like (and indeed would be) deliberate omission if they did not have articles.
I would point out that though they are excellent works, the presence of projects such as Memory Alpha that are not part of the Wikimedia complex should not be considered as a factors when nominating articles for deletion. If Wikipedia were to stop covering topics for which there was already another source, we wouldn't have much of an encyclopedia at all.
It may be useful for you to consider the Cortana article as an expanded section of the Halo: Combat Evolved article. In the natural course of development of articles on Wikipedia, certain topics within topics become too large to practicably keep in the article. In such cases, the subtopics are broken out into new articles. These subtopic articles may not necessarily be notable by themselves; but their usefulness should always be considered in the context of the primary article in the sense of depth and background they provide. If the entry is obvious cruft, speculation, or other fabrication, heavy editing or even deletion may be in order. But, in my opinion, it is improper to delete articles that do provide further insight. -- AlexWCovington ( talk) 22:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi!! i hv created the article Mrinal Pande but this had a problem which was fixed by you. How? may i know? i am talking about the last charcter Y which was added by me accidently, when i hv created this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rajeshroshan ( talk • contribs) 07:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
i am talking about this AWB feature. how can i remove the browser cache. Guddu 05:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
With regard to the image in Jan Björklund, sometimes the software that resizes the image ( ImageMagick) has some kind of bug and does not show the resized image. Changing the parameters slightly, like reducing the size by 1 pixel, can solve this ( diff). After a while it might be possible to resize the image to the original size. I also removed the height parameter, since the width is sufficient. The proportions of the image will adjust automagically. -- Oden 01:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I looked at both, and noted a vast difference in tone and volubility between his Talk page interaction and his Edit summaries. Frankly, he was marginally more convincing in his edit summaries..
But I wasn't saying he was right, just that it's unusual for 3RR violators to defend their edits so much.-- Vercalos 10:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Hej Plrk. Thank you for contacting me. I prefer not to comment on the disputed content of the article, as it's not my area of expertise. However, I see that there's an edit war going on. If it continues, I may protect the article (or you may request protection on WP:RPP) so that consensus may be achieved on the talk page without continuous warring. Regards.-- Hús ö nd 20:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Do you agree to accept me as your mediator in Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Christian Democracy? Alan.ca 02:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
"Why screw around with the ToC?"
Because if one does one does not get that big, stupid, useless blank big right eating up half the page in the middle of one's browser when the page loads.
Is is some new Wiki law not to? Why else was the template made? If it is used at the top then it clashes with the other tags. Placed where it is text flows nicely about it. Simple.
195.82.106.244 07:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
I have opened the case, Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-08 Swedish Anarcho-syndicalist Youth Federation on the mediation cabal. Do you wish to proceed with the mediation with me as your mediator? Alan.ca 08:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Sam Spade 13:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia. I've visited it a couple times, but never really tried editing until now. I wanted to know why exactly you consider me adding The HeadCrab Union on the Half-Life 2 page advertising. It's a place for all Valve games and mods. Is there some reason that it doesn't deserve to be listed along with the other fan sites? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by sentinelrv ( talk • contribs).
This author has had more than enough time to assert notability, and the article should be {{db-web}}ed, not {{notability}}ed.
Pumeleon
T
03:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Nevermind. I see that you saw it.
Pumeleon
T
03:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your comment on Talk:Chicken#Swimming? and just had to ask: you listened to Trafiktrolles kassettradio when you were younger, didn't you? // 74.56.91.108 04:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. I have approved your request and you should now be able to use the AWB application. Be sure to check every edit before you save it, and don't forget to check out the AWB Guide. You can get any help you need over on the AWB talk page. Feel free to contact me with any questions, Alphachimp 05:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Why do you put that box around yourself? Do you condone drinking alcohol and smoking cigarettes as opposed to hash, pot and whatevers even more potent? On the one side i take it you want to ligitimize what you do drink or smoke as opposed to whats "wrong" or "evil" or "against the law" or "bad for ones health" and on the other side you are ligitimizing government control on 2 sides: The first is giving citizens some drugs that they can use, so that many doesnt get too angry about not having their after-work drink or the "i got to go get a cigarette" break. The other is creating a small minority of criminals to make sure that the many can say "Iam not an addict, iam a good, iam right" so to keep them going and working for the state and the capital, whats worth anything to people with power. This last one also makes sure the police and the different government bodys got an extra job.
Anyhow smoking cigarettes affect other people as opposed to joints which is rarely smoken around lots of people and even if its hard on one self putting needles in ones arm its hardly something which attack other people on their physical health. Taken in this perspective alcohol is probably the worst of them all as that above anything else (not even speed) effects the level of aggression!
Why do you have to put that badge on yourself? Making yourself better than the people who have problems doesnt make their situation any better! Its alienation! My body is filled with drugs, and what the fuck is your problem with that! -- Fjulle 16:42, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
I did not come to Wikipedia to discuss anarchism and alcohol. However, I will reply - later, when I have some time without anything better to do. Further, I would like to point out that by the statement above I wanted to claim that the personal liberty of Fjulle's political beliefs is a hoax - not that I believe in forced collectivization. And for the record, I still haven't said I want to illegalize drugs. Nor do I want to illegalize drugs. For the other parts, see my coming post. Plrk ( Talk ° contribs) 19:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
In Anarchism, I noted that " Communistic experiments are said to both require and result in greater central control (i.e. the Soviet Politbureau and the Five year plan)." If the USSR doesn't provide sufficient proof, I am willing to elaborate. JLMadrigal 12:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw you crop the information of local news of Nashik on page Nashik. I can't guess the reason behind it. So please keep the links of "Local News of Nashik". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.0.45 ( talk • contribs)
"Comital" is an English adjective meaning "pertaining to a count", and not necessarily a typo for "committal". Choess 17:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
hi,
Some of them are internal links and I disagree this move. I am reverting that change. Please explain me If u decide to re revert it. spacejuncky 05:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey, will you take trouble and explain me why list of educational institutions are removed. Afterall They are linked to internal wiki pages??
Please explain. spacejuncky 12:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Mr. Plrk don't force your personal opinion on 'Nashik community'(Are you from Nashik?). Links of 'Local News of Nashik' are informative to related people of Nashik City. If you are disagree with this leave it as it is. This is not your personal page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.95.7.238 ( talk • contribs).
Take a look at government simulation game. I've essentially rewritten the article and added some strong references. I think you'll agree that this article establishes notability and is now well-sourced. There could still be a lot more information added, but I think this is adequate to get started. Tarinth 02:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
OK I'll bite.. how come you prod-tagged nearly all the Covenant albums except Dreams of a Cryotank and Europa? Did you think those two were somehow more notable? The articles for those don't seem any more detailed than the rest. Or did you intend to prod-tag them all? -- Vossanova o< 13:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm concerned you may be taking the issue of fictional characters issue too seriously. Cruft has always been an issue on Wikipedia, but it is also important to recognize the cultural value of fictional characters. The names of Han Solo and Jean-Luc Picard are so reknowned throughout the English-speaking world, it would seem like (and indeed would be) deliberate omission if they did not have articles.
I would point out that though they are excellent works, the presence of projects such as Memory Alpha that are not part of the Wikimedia complex should not be considered as a factors when nominating articles for deletion. If Wikipedia were to stop covering topics for which there was already another source, we wouldn't have much of an encyclopedia at all.
It may be useful for you to consider the Cortana article as an expanded section of the Halo: Combat Evolved article. In the natural course of development of articles on Wikipedia, certain topics within topics become too large to practicably keep in the article. In such cases, the subtopics are broken out into new articles. These subtopic articles may not necessarily be notable by themselves; but their usefulness should always be considered in the context of the primary article in the sense of depth and background they provide. If the entry is obvious cruft, speculation, or other fabrication, heavy editing or even deletion may be in order. But, in my opinion, it is improper to delete articles that do provide further insight. -- AlexWCovington ( talk) 22:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi!! i hv created the article Mrinal Pande but this had a problem which was fixed by you. How? may i know? i am talking about the last charcter Y which was added by me accidently, when i hv created this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rajeshroshan ( talk • contribs) 07:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
i am talking about this AWB feature. how can i remove the browser cache. Guddu 05:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
With regard to the image in Jan Björklund, sometimes the software that resizes the image ( ImageMagick) has some kind of bug and does not show the resized image. Changing the parameters slightly, like reducing the size by 1 pixel, can solve this ( diff). After a while it might be possible to resize the image to the original size. I also removed the height parameter, since the width is sufficient. The proportions of the image will adjust automagically. -- Oden 01:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)