You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Antony Coia. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 19:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
We cannot speedily delete the page because other users have substantially edited it (see WP:CSD#G7). Please stop blanking the page. Thanks, Mz7 ( talk) 19:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Favonian (
talk) 19:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Pizzole ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Oh yes, this is a personal attack. The page is on wikipedia since May 2015. It's only a personal attack. Wiki is not really free. Pizzole ( talk) 16:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I strongly suggest you use the time of this block to think about your approach to collaborative editing, as the attitude you seem to be exhibiting right now will almost certainly earn you longer blocks if it continues. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 16:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk) 13:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Thank you. This is what I asked for days. [[User:Pizzole|Pizzole]] ([[User talk:Pizzole#top|talk]]) 13:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)}}
Stop making threats of retribution on those who are following guidelines and seeking to have pages deleted. There are pages that have been on Wikipedia since 2005 that are under consideration for deletion. Gettting mad because one that has been here since May 2015 is being so considered makes no sense at all.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 14:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm blocked, so, peace for you!-- Pizzole ( talk) 18:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Ok, guys... Your behaviour is very unclear. You are deleting a page with sources from newspapers ( [1], [2], [3] and more) and some of you have created pages that need to be deleted just because there is a serious COI about sources you applied (from same subject of the article). It isn't @ Tokyogirl79:? Are you sure what are you talking about? You have some pages that need to be revised. I'll do it.-- Pizzole ( talk) 11:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
You should be ashamed because you have even deleted sources from Istituto Luce, "The oldest public institution devoted to production and distribution of cinematographic materials for didactic and informative purposes in the world.".
Hello, Pizzole. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Internet Horror Movie Database".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — MRD2014 ( talk) ( contribs) 01:56, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Pizzole. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Internet Horror Movie Database".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 15:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Antony Coia. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 19:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
We cannot speedily delete the page because other users have substantially edited it (see WP:CSD#G7). Please stop blanking the page. Thanks, Mz7 ( talk) 19:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Favonian (
talk) 19:36, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Pizzole ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Oh yes, this is a personal attack. The page is on wikipedia since May 2015. It's only a personal attack. Wiki is not really free. Pizzole ( talk) 16:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I strongly suggest you use the time of this block to think about your approach to collaborative editing, as the attitude you seem to be exhibiting right now will almost certainly earn you longer blocks if it continues. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 16:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk) 13:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Thank you. This is what I asked for days. [[User:Pizzole|Pizzole]] ([[User talk:Pizzole#top|talk]]) 13:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)}}
Stop making threats of retribution on those who are following guidelines and seeking to have pages deleted. There are pages that have been on Wikipedia since 2005 that are under consideration for deletion. Gettting mad because one that has been here since May 2015 is being so considered makes no sense at all.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 14:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm blocked, so, peace for you!-- Pizzole ( talk) 18:26, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Ok, guys... Your behaviour is very unclear. You are deleting a page with sources from newspapers ( [1], [2], [3] and more) and some of you have created pages that need to be deleted just because there is a serious COI about sources you applied (from same subject of the article). It isn't @ Tokyogirl79:? Are you sure what are you talking about? You have some pages that need to be revised. I'll do it.-- Pizzole ( talk) 11:21, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
You should be ashamed because you have even deleted sources from Istituto Luce, "The oldest public institution devoted to production and distribution of cinematographic materials for didactic and informative purposes in the world.".
Hello, Pizzole. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Internet Horror Movie Database".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — MRD2014 ( talk) ( contribs) 01:56, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Pizzole. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Internet Horror Movie Database".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 15:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)