![]() |
![]() | If I leave a message for you: Respond on your talk page. I will add it to my watchlist, but I'm less likely to miss your message if you place {{
Talkback}} on my page.
|
Please leave a . |
Welcome!
Hello, Pip2andahalf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Demonoid. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Gary King (
talk)
06:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
The new layout has already been covered in the article, and the opposition group is highly unimportant unless discussed in reliable sources. Glass Cobra 23:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Hidden Page Barnstar | |
I award you one for finding Trekphiler's page for people who always think that "new message" bar is real. Aren't you glad you checked your mail? TREKphiler hit me ♠ 08:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) |
<--If you got the joke, & aren't offended (I wasn't so sure it was as funny to you as to me...), go ahead & restore it from the page history, if you want. Or not. And yeh, I'm glad you got it. (My sense of humor is a bit weird...) TREKphiler hit me ♠ 22:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
Thank you for your advice. I'm tryng to log with the "Joaum" username, but, until now, nothing had happened. As you have told, the username is valid. Is strange that I can log. I always use the same password to avoid this tipe of problems. Well, I'll keep tryng.
Once more, thank you.
(Sorry about my poor english, is not my native) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.1.169.221 ( talk) 11:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Glad you like some of the userboxes. Here's a whole list of them you can use: Userboxes Template -- MF14 14:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
pure chance (: jimfbleak ( talk) 14:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
...got a new message ;-) Lugnuts ( talk) 16:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I have just started the article, and I know it's short, but I didn't even have a chance to expand it before the tag was placed on it. What do I need to add? I will add it. Also, please make sure it is not deleted immediately. -- IRP ( talk) 21:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Just a friendly note on Torx (game). I declined your speedy deletion request because the article (even when you made the request) did not meet the requirements of G1 patent nonsense. If you still think the article needs to be deleted, I'd suggest taking it to AfD. Thanks!-- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I see you speedily deleted the article I created. Could you clarify on what was missing? I had thought I had enough information necessary for a minute-old stub.-- Armyable ( talk) 05:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mynyddawg_Mwynfawr
what you talkin bout issues? That's a good f'n article! Bilodeauzx ( talk) 04:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
jimfbleak ( talk) 07:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I'd tend to agree that the Bumvertising article feels very fiddly. It troubled me in the Homelessness article and in its own right. I've tried to edit it in and out in bits but was uncertain how to approach the larger issue. It has gotten Seattle press, apparently. But of the oddest sort. I don't ever hear anyone talking about its being humanistic or philanthropic although it purports to be, which is really stretching it, in my gut. In fact, no serious person helping the homeless seems to talk about it or think it's actually appropriate as far as I know. Best wishes. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc ( talk) 01:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
(exdent) Excellent, Pip ! It's my great pleasure as well for the interaction. It does seem like a fiddly item to insert in the poor battered article on Homelessness (since we are all getting rid of constant vandalism which might say something implicitly about people's feelings on the sad plight of homeless and poor people). Let alone to do in reality with Bumvertising. But it's historically precedented. One is reminded of Scrooge in "A Christmas Carol" -- "Are there no workhouses?". Yeah. Good thing the story ended on a different note. Please keep me updated. Bests. -- (Bob) Wikiklrsc ( talk) 20:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
I have to ask you, why did you revert me here? I asked on the talk page about removing the un-cited sections, was told to get rid of information without sources, and so I went ahead and cut out a large (and libelous) section, to be rebuilt later with well sourced references. Please undo your change, that you labeled "vandalism." Thank you, Will 01:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
The article now has a proposed deletion tag, placed on it by User:Orangemike. Look at this -- IRP ☎ 02:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
What should I do? -- IRP ☎ 02:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Back to this now. You should merge both VORTEX and VORTEX2 into VORTEX project. -- IRP ☎ 23:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
I have merged VORTEX and VORTEX2 into VORTEX projects. -- IRP ☎ 15:48, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey fuck off with your bs comments fuck head!! I know my shit, she was born in Dublin...so fuck off and quit changing my shit!! Fucking studenty waster
You told me my comment on the blackpool talk page was vandalistic. I thought that was where I was meant to argue my case!? How do I discuss an issue with the person who didn't want me to include an external link? I clearly haven't grasped how wikipedia works. Apologies.
Can Eunice High School get deleted until I am ready to work on it?
PIP: Could you please tell Orange Mike to stop working on my page for me and what is up with all the warnings? I don't understand the new vandalism violation you put. Orange has been messing with my Wiki.
Now somebody else is threatening to remove my edit privs. This is so confusing and annoying.
I am so annyoed I just want out of this. Sorry to sound like this but I must say you were the nicest of all editors/admins.
Yeah you can- Tell these people to chill lol. They say I cannot ask for a deletion because it belongs to Wikipedia. When there is a requested deletion tag?
Ok here is the deal- I wasn't familiar with anything about Wiki. Therefore until I learn, I just think it be better that I practice. But supposedly Orange has tried doing the article and I find that rude and disrespectful even though he's trying to help. I am not ready to write on Wiki plain and simple. And all of these people think I'm stupid. Edit: I REQUESTED DELETION WHEN I FIRST STARTED IT BEFORE THE EDITOR CONTRIBUTION
Well in that case why should I edit it? Everybody's doing it for me!
add it in!! then you've contributed to an article that you didn't create... It's how the whole Wiki project works out. Did that help? ~ Pip 23:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Yeah. I am starting to get the point. Lol. Somebody else is talking to me about the whole thing on my talk page.
Btw: You gonna come to my page now and then til I'm comfortable? Shark
Hi there, I don't mean to sound rude, but I have spent about an hour and a half this evening altering the page for Paris Hilton's My New BFF so that it can be more detailed and accurate. I logged on just now to find that my hard work had been removed. My edits to the page were constructive and I ask that they please not be reverted. Thank you...
to bad for you this is a free information page, and vandalism doesn't mean jack on Wikipedia. you can't just throw around tort terms like that especially when you don't know what they mean. Its Wikipedia, not Britannica.
Why did you revert the article to a stub after I'd added production background informations, notable actors, a more detailed plot description (removing some errors regarding the plot the article originally had), and listed the awards the film had won or was nominated for? Those are all bare minimum standards for any movie article on Wikipedia, so it's no use calling it "unconstructive".
Also, it's no use "welcoming" me or pointing me to the sandbox, as I've been active on Wikipedia pretty much daily since 2003 under a different account. -- 77.184.15.29 ( talk) 05:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Yo man whats the deal with reverting my w&m edits. Its not vandalism, it is ratified by us news and world reports.
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college/items/3705
USNews & World rates it as "most selective."
I'd be happy to, sure. I'll also leave you a message on your talk page that will give you some links to articles that will help you learn more about how to edit Wikipedia. Someday, maybe you'll write an article that become featured eventually! :) ~ Pip 06:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Please do not revert my footnoted edits that include an explanation for the edits without full explanation. Do you have alternate sources that contradict the footnote? Do you understand the importance of the special relationship between the Regent and the General? What have you read on the subject of the secret peace negotiations? Werchovsky ( talk) 06:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
This entry is pretty rough, and I've been working on polishing it up a bit, little by little. Not sure why my edits were reverted, but I wanted to make it clear that they were in no way vandalism. I'll start building references as I go along, but as the existing article still has none, I hope there can be some good faith in the meantime.
Ok so, I change Kevin Uribe's flag to a Columbian flag (when he IS Columbian), but you allowed other flags which are incorrect to go unedited. I'm getting the feeling that you ARE Kevin Uribe. Check Moe Assad and Jared Reyes. Good work man.
1) Those were CONSTRUCTIVE edits 2) They were CITED with good sources
You are wrong.
4.240.78.44 ( talk) 09:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Seems there is history on you accusing people of vandalism when they are adding information. According to an article in "Finanical Management" (CIMA's membership publication) on connected directors to the two US political parties, she was the chair of the President's Commision on Aviation Security & Terrorism. Perhap a request to cite the source would have been more appropriate. The article was called Capitol Gains by a Jorg Rocholl.
Hi! You should really be more careful when warning people, this edit is hardly vandalism (although the header the user chose was a bit off-style) but you still gave him a Level 2 warning. Have a good day! Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 13:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Ok. 98.226.32.129 ( talk) 20:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Why unconstructive? you took my advice didn't you? 190.55.189.248 ( talk) 21:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, Sorry about that. I thought he was a vandal. Since at that time, many user pages got blanked. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 22:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
I've given your userpage a bit of a breather from the attention it's been getting, but let me know if you'd rather not have it - or if you'd like it for longer. Regards, Bencherlite Talk 02:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I had a User: (my name) page, but I'd like to delete it because it shows up in google. Is this possible? It's User:Jonathan Chernick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigjonny1992 ( talk • contribs) 08:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I apologize, I didn't realize what I did. Thanks.
ICorinthians2.4-5 ( talk) 23:34, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
You didn't send this to me?....
"Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Creation according to Genesis.
If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ~Pip2andahalf 23:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)"
I am trying to figure out what I did wrong. Thanks! ICorinthians2.4-5 ( talk) 23:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
That's OK, "Nuclearwarfare" helped me see what I did wrong, I'll try not to do it again. Thanks anyway! ICorinthians2.4-5 ( talk) 23:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Interesting...so if (in this case) the author was making statements from a secular point of view, that is decidedly not in accordance with the "spirit" of the topic as seen by non-secular scholars, how should I approach editing it? Can I add editing stating that the above is from a secular point of view, and then "However..." to give the viewpoint of non-secular scholars? How should I approach this? and thanks for your help.
ICorinthians2.4-5 (
talk)
00:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Happy editing! ~ Pip 2 andahalf 00:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
That a Republican Attorney General, a member of Antonovitch's party, had a differring opinion on something that Antonovitch was so dead set against, is very constructive and allows readers to better understand where Antonovitch's priorities lie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.213.237.158 ( talk) 05:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
That looks like a pure opinion on your part. If anything, keeping the article NPOV requires disclosure that people of his own ilk didn't agree with him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.213.237.158 ( talk) 08:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
For Wikiproject India, BE is the standard. If you don't believe it, you can go and check the manual of style in the project pages. I have nothing against AmE. Maquahuitl talk! 07:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I made a error in my revert edit so I'm just going to say that it was an accident and I've figured it out now. Thank you. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kiddish.K#Yahshua Kiddish.K ( talk) 18:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Steve Fossett HAS been confirmed to be dead. The MSNBC article I haphazardly linked to mentions this; the story was just reported on CNN. This is not vandalism.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27523123/
147.9.231.177 ( talk) 22:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I note you reverted my clumsy attempt to make a disambiguation. I am trying to distinguish the New Zealand Armed Offenders Squad, which has a good reputation, from the totally separate, scandalous, disbanded, and (I think) WP-worthy Armed Offenders Squad (Victoria). I may be doing it wrong. Can you help out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xtine-nixon ( talk • contribs) 23:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for taking the time to clean up vandalism, however I think my change was constructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.53.149.119 ( talk) 23:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
do you get how the electoral college works? clearly not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcadam ( talk • contribs) 09:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
That's true, which is why I say it's a moot point and we should stop arguing over it. I most definitely see you point, but at the same time I still don't know if it's a necessary addition. Either way, it's not harmful to have the word there... I think we can pretty safely say he's the next president of the US, but yes, I suppose he is actually the presumed next president at the moment. :) I would be pretty mad at someone if he somehow lost haha Thanks for discussing it with me. Happy editing! ~ Pip 2 andahalf 09:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
you sir are too fast for me T_T —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bleacher66 ( talk • contribs) 09:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
why do you squash my fun and how do you find them so fast? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.47.19.99 ( talk) 09:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
that keeps my edits from being removed..
OH MY!
that's incredible. you gave away your secret but i don't think it really matters.
you missed one i did though, a million internets to you if you can find it! also were you aware that your account sends out a message threatening to remove the ability to edit when you revert edits? haha
your deal of a million internets pleases me.
You bitches better recognize.
Why do you consider what I am doing vandalism? Obama is part Irish, French, German, and English? Please respond ASAP as I have to masturbate soon.
Please go to this link, where you can find that Mr. Obama is part French: Madelyn_and_Stanley_Dunham
How did my edit to this page constitute to vandalism? I only added something that explained what sort of a character Haresh was. I don't see how that can be called vandalism. Also, I don't mean any offence, but there seem to be an awful lot of complaints on this page about you removing so-called "vandalism". George.millman ( talk) 11:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, my mistake. It wasn't an edit to The Sarah Jane Adventures, it was an edit to List of The Sarah Jane Andventures minor characters. I don't actually have a talk page, but you left me a message (I'm not sure how you do that) saying that what I had added was vandalism. All I wrote was how Haresh was strict at school but at home a much nicer character, and how Gita forgets Sarah Jane's name, much like previous character Chrissie. I don't quite understand how this constitutes vandalism. George.millman ( talk) 12:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
maybe instead of trying to feel awesome for your quick response times to what you seem to think is vandalism, you should look at what you're undoing first. apparently more often than not it's legit stuff. nobody thinks you're cool for deleting the fastest, or whatever.
Well said, Wikipedia User With No Name. I personally would much rather have an accurate edit than a fast one. George.millman ( talk) 15:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
I requested a semi in IRC. If that works, great, if not we'll just have to play whack a mole. Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 04:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
u treaded me not right. i'm like a super mc and rapper and stuff, so my edits were totally legit, so let it be. A.) I don't know what articles/ revisions you're referencing B.) I don't know who you are (please sign messages by adding ~~~~ to the end. Thanks ~ Pip 2 andahalf 12:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
ich bin auch der bernd aus dem tv. ist das nicht toll? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.207.116.120 ( talk) 11:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
yo dude can you help me in making an autho biography of a living photographer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tralalazxers ( talk • contribs) 11:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello there Pip2andahalf, i see that you have an intrest in the SR2 characters as well. Please do not delete facts that are true because I find it annoying that i have to put it back in again. Thank you and have a nice day. DJ MeXsTa ( talk)
From Wikipedia: A terrane in geology is a fragment of crustal material formed on, or broken off from, one tectonic plate and accreted — "sutured" — to crust lying on another plate. The crustal block or fragment preserves its own distinctive geologic history, which is different from that of the surrounding areas (hence the term "exotic" terrane.
From the dictionary: Upmost - a synonym for uppermost. CGX ( talk) 03:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
The article was filled with incorrect information. It is slander to the Austrian citizens. It mars Austria's name. I filled it with:
![]() | This user page needs to be updated. Please help update this user page to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. |
Please rewrite this section with correct information.
in hopes that it would be corrected
Thanks for your message. Yes, I have been here for five years now, through a lot of changes in my life. I haven't been quite as active in the last year, as I am even busier with college activities in my real life! but I read on your user page that you are involved in Recent Pages and New Pages patrol, which I used to do a lot of. I hope to start that more regularly soon, and hopefully we will meet and colaborate there someday. It seems like you're a great editor also. Academic Challenger ( talk) 22:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your hard working reverting vandalism (including to my user page). Keep up the good work! -- Flewis (talk) 09:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC) |
Oooh! I'm so excited! My first barnstar!! (besides hidden page ones :P) w00t ~ Pip 2 andahalf 09:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
On Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rent: Filmed Live on Broadway (film), you said "Merge and Delete". I don't understand why it's necessary to delete it. It just needs to be redirected to the page that it's merged to. That's the way it's usually done, and that's what I suggest you should say on the AfD. -- IRP ☎ 17:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() ![]() ![]() |
-- RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 14:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)"Gong"ratulations Watchlist Contributor Award | |
You get this award to contributing to a page on my watchlist, French colonial empire! Congratulations! You are awarded with this award! |
I agree that some of the items are not appropriate.
However, as a Christian, I do believe that murderers go to hell. Therefore, it is a religious truth that Marceline Jones and Jim Jones currently reside in hell. Anybody want to argue that Jimmy boy was not a psycho?
MauiBigDog ( talk) 01:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Pip2andahalf,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page ( here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
The Helpful One 20:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi. You may be interested in a centralised discussion on the subject of "lists of unusual things" to be found here. SP-KP ( talk) 17:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Can you please tell me which article you warning refers to? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.39.226 ( talk) 16:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Pip2andahalf! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:48, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Pip2andahalf,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Pip2andahalf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() | If I leave a message for you: Respond on your talk page. I will add it to my watchlist, but I'm less likely to miss your message if you place {{
Talkback}} on my page.
|
Please leave a . |
Welcome!
Hello, Pip2andahalf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Demonoid. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Gary King (
talk)
06:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
The new layout has already been covered in the article, and the opposition group is highly unimportant unless discussed in reliable sources. Glass Cobra 23:10, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Hidden Page Barnstar | |
I award you one for finding Trekphiler's page for people who always think that "new message" bar is real. Aren't you glad you checked your mail? TREKphiler hit me ♠ 08:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) |
<--If you got the joke, & aren't offended (I wasn't so sure it was as funny to you as to me...), go ahead & restore it from the page history, if you want. Or not. And yeh, I'm glad you got it. (My sense of humor is a bit weird...) TREKphiler hit me ♠ 22:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi!
Thank you for your advice. I'm tryng to log with the "Joaum" username, but, until now, nothing had happened. As you have told, the username is valid. Is strange that I can log. I always use the same password to avoid this tipe of problems. Well, I'll keep tryng.
Once more, thank you.
(Sorry about my poor english, is not my native) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.1.169.221 ( talk) 11:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Glad you like some of the userboxes. Here's a whole list of them you can use: Userboxes Template -- MF14 14:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
pure chance (: jimfbleak ( talk) 14:58, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
...got a new message ;-) Lugnuts ( talk) 16:52, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I have just started the article, and I know it's short, but I didn't even have a chance to expand it before the tag was placed on it. What do I need to add? I will add it. Also, please make sure it is not deleted immediately. -- IRP ( talk) 21:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Just a friendly note on Torx (game). I declined your speedy deletion request because the article (even when you made the request) did not meet the requirements of G1 patent nonsense. If you still think the article needs to be deleted, I'd suggest taking it to AfD. Thanks!-- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:01, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I see you speedily deleted the article I created. Could you clarify on what was missing? I had thought I had enough information necessary for a minute-old stub.-- Armyable ( talk) 05:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mynyddawg_Mwynfawr
what you talkin bout issues? That's a good f'n article! Bilodeauzx ( talk) 04:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
jimfbleak ( talk) 07:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I'd tend to agree that the Bumvertising article feels very fiddly. It troubled me in the Homelessness article and in its own right. I've tried to edit it in and out in bits but was uncertain how to approach the larger issue. It has gotten Seattle press, apparently. But of the oddest sort. I don't ever hear anyone talking about its being humanistic or philanthropic although it purports to be, which is really stretching it, in my gut. In fact, no serious person helping the homeless seems to talk about it or think it's actually appropriate as far as I know. Best wishes. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc ( talk) 01:47, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
(exdent) Excellent, Pip ! It's my great pleasure as well for the interaction. It does seem like a fiddly item to insert in the poor battered article on Homelessness (since we are all getting rid of constant vandalism which might say something implicitly about people's feelings on the sad plight of homeless and poor people). Let alone to do in reality with Bumvertising. But it's historically precedented. One is reminded of Scrooge in "A Christmas Carol" -- "Are there no workhouses?". Yeah. Good thing the story ended on a different note. Please keep me updated. Bests. -- (Bob) Wikiklrsc ( talk) 20:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
I have to ask you, why did you revert me here? I asked on the talk page about removing the un-cited sections, was told to get rid of information without sources, and so I went ahead and cut out a large (and libelous) section, to be rebuilt later with well sourced references. Please undo your change, that you labeled "vandalism." Thank you, Will 01:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
The article now has a proposed deletion tag, placed on it by User:Orangemike. Look at this -- IRP ☎ 02:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
What should I do? -- IRP ☎ 02:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Back to this now. You should merge both VORTEX and VORTEX2 into VORTEX project. -- IRP ☎ 23:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
I have merged VORTEX and VORTEX2 into VORTEX projects. -- IRP ☎ 15:48, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey fuck off with your bs comments fuck head!! I know my shit, she was born in Dublin...so fuck off and quit changing my shit!! Fucking studenty waster
You told me my comment on the blackpool talk page was vandalistic. I thought that was where I was meant to argue my case!? How do I discuss an issue with the person who didn't want me to include an external link? I clearly haven't grasped how wikipedia works. Apologies.
Can Eunice High School get deleted until I am ready to work on it?
PIP: Could you please tell Orange Mike to stop working on my page for me and what is up with all the warnings? I don't understand the new vandalism violation you put. Orange has been messing with my Wiki.
Now somebody else is threatening to remove my edit privs. This is so confusing and annoying.
I am so annyoed I just want out of this. Sorry to sound like this but I must say you were the nicest of all editors/admins.
Yeah you can- Tell these people to chill lol. They say I cannot ask for a deletion because it belongs to Wikipedia. When there is a requested deletion tag?
Ok here is the deal- I wasn't familiar with anything about Wiki. Therefore until I learn, I just think it be better that I practice. But supposedly Orange has tried doing the article and I find that rude and disrespectful even though he's trying to help. I am not ready to write on Wiki plain and simple. And all of these people think I'm stupid. Edit: I REQUESTED DELETION WHEN I FIRST STARTED IT BEFORE THE EDITOR CONTRIBUTION
Well in that case why should I edit it? Everybody's doing it for me!
add it in!! then you've contributed to an article that you didn't create... It's how the whole Wiki project works out. Did that help? ~ Pip 23:20, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Yeah. I am starting to get the point. Lol. Somebody else is talking to me about the whole thing on my talk page.
Btw: You gonna come to my page now and then til I'm comfortable? Shark
Hi there, I don't mean to sound rude, but I have spent about an hour and a half this evening altering the page for Paris Hilton's My New BFF so that it can be more detailed and accurate. I logged on just now to find that my hard work had been removed. My edits to the page were constructive and I ask that they please not be reverted. Thank you...
to bad for you this is a free information page, and vandalism doesn't mean jack on Wikipedia. you can't just throw around tort terms like that especially when you don't know what they mean. Its Wikipedia, not Britannica.
Why did you revert the article to a stub after I'd added production background informations, notable actors, a more detailed plot description (removing some errors regarding the plot the article originally had), and listed the awards the film had won or was nominated for? Those are all bare minimum standards for any movie article on Wikipedia, so it's no use calling it "unconstructive".
Also, it's no use "welcoming" me or pointing me to the sandbox, as I've been active on Wikipedia pretty much daily since 2003 under a different account. -- 77.184.15.29 ( talk) 05:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Yo man whats the deal with reverting my w&m edits. Its not vandalism, it is ratified by us news and world reports.
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college/items/3705
USNews & World rates it as "most selective."
I'd be happy to, sure. I'll also leave you a message on your talk page that will give you some links to articles that will help you learn more about how to edit Wikipedia. Someday, maybe you'll write an article that become featured eventually! :) ~ Pip 06:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Please do not revert my footnoted edits that include an explanation for the edits without full explanation. Do you have alternate sources that contradict the footnote? Do you understand the importance of the special relationship between the Regent and the General? What have you read on the subject of the secret peace negotiations? Werchovsky ( talk) 06:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
This entry is pretty rough, and I've been working on polishing it up a bit, little by little. Not sure why my edits were reverted, but I wanted to make it clear that they were in no way vandalism. I'll start building references as I go along, but as the existing article still has none, I hope there can be some good faith in the meantime.
Ok so, I change Kevin Uribe's flag to a Columbian flag (when he IS Columbian), but you allowed other flags which are incorrect to go unedited. I'm getting the feeling that you ARE Kevin Uribe. Check Moe Assad and Jared Reyes. Good work man.
1) Those were CONSTRUCTIVE edits 2) They were CITED with good sources
You are wrong.
4.240.78.44 ( talk) 09:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Seems there is history on you accusing people of vandalism when they are adding information. According to an article in "Finanical Management" (CIMA's membership publication) on connected directors to the two US political parties, she was the chair of the President's Commision on Aviation Security & Terrorism. Perhap a request to cite the source would have been more appropriate. The article was called Capitol Gains by a Jorg Rocholl.
Hi! You should really be more careful when warning people, this edit is hardly vandalism (although the header the user chose was a bit off-style) but you still gave him a Level 2 warning. Have a good day! Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 13:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Ok. 98.226.32.129 ( talk) 20:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Why unconstructive? you took my advice didn't you? 190.55.189.248 ( talk) 21:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, Sorry about that. I thought he was a vandal. Since at that time, many user pages got blanked. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 22:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
I've given your userpage a bit of a breather from the attention it's been getting, but let me know if you'd rather not have it - or if you'd like it for longer. Regards, Bencherlite Talk 02:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I had a User: (my name) page, but I'd like to delete it because it shows up in google. Is this possible? It's User:Jonathan Chernick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigjonny1992 ( talk • contribs) 08:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I apologize, I didn't realize what I did. Thanks.
ICorinthians2.4-5 ( talk) 23:34, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
You didn't send this to me?....
"Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Creation according to Genesis.
If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ~Pip2andahalf 23:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)"
I am trying to figure out what I did wrong. Thanks! ICorinthians2.4-5 ( talk) 23:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
That's OK, "Nuclearwarfare" helped me see what I did wrong, I'll try not to do it again. Thanks anyway! ICorinthians2.4-5 ( talk) 23:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Interesting...so if (in this case) the author was making statements from a secular point of view, that is decidedly not in accordance with the "spirit" of the topic as seen by non-secular scholars, how should I approach editing it? Can I add editing stating that the above is from a secular point of view, and then "However..." to give the viewpoint of non-secular scholars? How should I approach this? and thanks for your help.
ICorinthians2.4-5 (
talk)
00:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Happy editing! ~ Pip 2 andahalf 00:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
That a Republican Attorney General, a member of Antonovitch's party, had a differring opinion on something that Antonovitch was so dead set against, is very constructive and allows readers to better understand where Antonovitch's priorities lie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.213.237.158 ( talk) 05:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
That looks like a pure opinion on your part. If anything, keeping the article NPOV requires disclosure that people of his own ilk didn't agree with him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.213.237.158 ( talk) 08:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
For Wikiproject India, BE is the standard. If you don't believe it, you can go and check the manual of style in the project pages. I have nothing against AmE. Maquahuitl talk! 07:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
I made a error in my revert edit so I'm just going to say that it was an accident and I've figured it out now. Thank you. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kiddish.K#Yahshua Kiddish.K ( talk) 18:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Steve Fossett HAS been confirmed to be dead. The MSNBC article I haphazardly linked to mentions this; the story was just reported on CNN. This is not vandalism.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27523123/
147.9.231.177 ( talk) 22:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I note you reverted my clumsy attempt to make a disambiguation. I am trying to distinguish the New Zealand Armed Offenders Squad, which has a good reputation, from the totally separate, scandalous, disbanded, and (I think) WP-worthy Armed Offenders Squad (Victoria). I may be doing it wrong. Can you help out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xtine-nixon ( talk • contribs) 23:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for taking the time to clean up vandalism, however I think my change was constructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.53.149.119 ( talk) 23:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
do you get how the electoral college works? clearly not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcadam ( talk • contribs) 09:15, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
That's true, which is why I say it's a moot point and we should stop arguing over it. I most definitely see you point, but at the same time I still don't know if it's a necessary addition. Either way, it's not harmful to have the word there... I think we can pretty safely say he's the next president of the US, but yes, I suppose he is actually the presumed next president at the moment. :) I would be pretty mad at someone if he somehow lost haha Thanks for discussing it with me. Happy editing! ~ Pip 2 andahalf 09:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
you sir are too fast for me T_T —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bleacher66 ( talk • contribs) 09:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
why do you squash my fun and how do you find them so fast? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.47.19.99 ( talk) 09:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
that keeps my edits from being removed..
OH MY!
that's incredible. you gave away your secret but i don't think it really matters.
you missed one i did though, a million internets to you if you can find it! also were you aware that your account sends out a message threatening to remove the ability to edit when you revert edits? haha
your deal of a million internets pleases me.
You bitches better recognize.
Why do you consider what I am doing vandalism? Obama is part Irish, French, German, and English? Please respond ASAP as I have to masturbate soon.
Please go to this link, where you can find that Mr. Obama is part French: Madelyn_and_Stanley_Dunham
How did my edit to this page constitute to vandalism? I only added something that explained what sort of a character Haresh was. I don't see how that can be called vandalism. Also, I don't mean any offence, but there seem to be an awful lot of complaints on this page about you removing so-called "vandalism". George.millman ( talk) 11:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, my mistake. It wasn't an edit to The Sarah Jane Adventures, it was an edit to List of The Sarah Jane Andventures minor characters. I don't actually have a talk page, but you left me a message (I'm not sure how you do that) saying that what I had added was vandalism. All I wrote was how Haresh was strict at school but at home a much nicer character, and how Gita forgets Sarah Jane's name, much like previous character Chrissie. I don't quite understand how this constitutes vandalism. George.millman ( talk) 12:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
maybe instead of trying to feel awesome for your quick response times to what you seem to think is vandalism, you should look at what you're undoing first. apparently more often than not it's legit stuff. nobody thinks you're cool for deleting the fastest, or whatever.
Well said, Wikipedia User With No Name. I personally would much rather have an accurate edit than a fast one. George.millman ( talk) 15:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
I requested a semi in IRC. If that works, great, if not we'll just have to play whack a mole. Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 04:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
u treaded me not right. i'm like a super mc and rapper and stuff, so my edits were totally legit, so let it be. A.) I don't know what articles/ revisions you're referencing B.) I don't know who you are (please sign messages by adding ~~~~ to the end. Thanks ~ Pip 2 andahalf 12:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
ich bin auch der bernd aus dem tv. ist das nicht toll? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.207.116.120 ( talk) 11:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
yo dude can you help me in making an autho biography of a living photographer? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tralalazxers ( talk • contribs) 11:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello there Pip2andahalf, i see that you have an intrest in the SR2 characters as well. Please do not delete facts that are true because I find it annoying that i have to put it back in again. Thank you and have a nice day. DJ MeXsTa ( talk)
From Wikipedia: A terrane in geology is a fragment of crustal material formed on, or broken off from, one tectonic plate and accreted — "sutured" — to crust lying on another plate. The crustal block or fragment preserves its own distinctive geologic history, which is different from that of the surrounding areas (hence the term "exotic" terrane.
From the dictionary: Upmost - a synonym for uppermost. CGX ( talk) 03:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
The article was filled with incorrect information. It is slander to the Austrian citizens. It mars Austria's name. I filled it with:
![]() | This user page needs to be updated. Please help update this user page to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. |
Please rewrite this section with correct information.
in hopes that it would be corrected
Thanks for your message. Yes, I have been here for five years now, through a lot of changes in my life. I haven't been quite as active in the last year, as I am even busier with college activities in my real life! but I read on your user page that you are involved in Recent Pages and New Pages patrol, which I used to do a lot of. I hope to start that more regularly soon, and hopefully we will meet and colaborate there someday. It seems like you're a great editor also. Academic Challenger ( talk) 22:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your hard working reverting vandalism (including to my user page). Keep up the good work! -- Flewis (talk) 09:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC) |
Oooh! I'm so excited! My first barnstar!! (besides hidden page ones :P) w00t ~ Pip 2 andahalf 09:54, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
On Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rent: Filmed Live on Broadway (film), you said "Merge and Delete". I don't understand why it's necessary to delete it. It just needs to be redirected to the page that it's merged to. That's the way it's usually done, and that's what I suggest you should say on the AfD. -- IRP ☎ 17:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
![]() ![]() ![]() |
-- RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 14:26, 8 November 2008 (UTC)"Gong"ratulations Watchlist Contributor Award | |
You get this award to contributing to a page on my watchlist, French colonial empire! Congratulations! You are awarded with this award! |
I agree that some of the items are not appropriate.
However, as a Christian, I do believe that murderers go to hell. Therefore, it is a religious truth that Marceline Jones and Jim Jones currently reside in hell. Anybody want to argue that Jimmy boy was not a psycho?
MauiBigDog ( talk) 01:25, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Pip2andahalf,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page ( here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
The Helpful One 20:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi. You may be interested in a centralised discussion on the subject of "lists of unusual things" to be found here. SP-KP ( talk) 17:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Can you please tell me which article you warning refers to? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.130.39.226 ( talk) 16:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Pip2andahalf! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:48, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Pip2andahalf,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Pip2andahalf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)