NBA | This user is a participant in the WikiProject National Basketball Association. |
![]() | This user is a
participant in
WikiProject Mixed martial arts. |
![]() | This user is a
participant in WikiProject Asia. |
![]() | This user
participates in WikiProject Asian Americans. |
![]() |
|
I do not dialogue with eds who revert my messages on talk pages - regardless of whether I am wrong or not - it looked like an overemphasis upon the philipine element - I may well be wrong - but the issue is that in many south east asian articles - unreferenced material stays that way (uncorrected) for much longer periods of time and is not reverted. It is next to impossible to have discussions when messages are deleted. Thats all - cheers Satu Suro 14:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for the report of vandalism. As you have done, the user should be warned, and the warnings escalated - should s/he continue, then reporting this is in order, and that will be followed by a short term of removal of editing rights. I will keep an eye on the user too. Many thanks for helping to keep Wikipedia a source of good information! docboat ( talk) 13:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi.
In this edit, I've recently removed some material you added to the History of the Philippines (Before 1521) article back in May of 2009. It looked to me as if the material had been pretty randomly dropped into the article with little or no regard of the pre-1521 timeframe of the topic of the article, of surrounding context or of WP:MOS and WP:GTL. If you feel that parts of this material does belong in the article, feel free to re-incorporate it but please try to do that a bit more smoothly than was done earlier. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
You are finding good sources of new info. I hope you are not taking my edits and comments personally :-) We look like the main contributors of late so look forward to working with you. Bagumba ( talk) 00:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
UFC 139, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. You are in violation of
WP:3RR if you do not stop and discuss on the article's talk/discussion page, I will report you for blocking. This also pertains to the other article you are fighting about. I will review this information myself and come up with a consensus. —
cyberpower (
Talk to Me)(
Contributions)
00:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Please don't post this everywhere. — cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 00:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
— cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 00:52, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
I have concluded with information on hand that the information on the page regarding his whereabouts, is America. The flag is to remain the way it is now and not be altered to his birth place.— cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 01:06, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi again - many thanks for the heads up regarding the revert issues you mentioned. I see you already have help on board, and if I can contribute I will, but for the moment I will sit and watch quietly. All the best. docboat ( talk) 01:10, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Furthermore, I would like to thank Cyberpower for handling this situation. I am personally shocked how someone believes one picture is 100% proof for everything, when other information provided proved otherwise. Anyways, thanks again for all your time and cooperation PinoyFilAmPride ( talk) 01:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Reverted.— cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 19:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
http://cdn0.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/2307621/11_SilvaLe_09_large.jpg. He literally came out to the 3 stripes, not the current one with one star that the UFC used in the tale of the tape. Also please review the Flag of South Vietnam article, it even states that many Vietnamese immigrants find the current communist flag of Vietnam as offensive. If you will consider exceptions, please at least use the Flag of South Vietnam if you do not want to use the USA one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_South_Vietnam PinoyFilAmPride ( talk) 18:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Would you like me to setup an archive system on your page?— cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 01:37, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
I have bad news. I contacted a coworker of Cung Le. His nationality is Vietnamese where he is represented by a red flag with a yellow star.— cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 01:00, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a
general rule, talk pages such as
User_Talk:Cyberpower678 are for discussion related to improving the article,
not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Do not you my talk page to fight each other. —
cyberpower (
Talk to Me)(
Contributions)
10:28, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
PinoyFilAmPride ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have discussed the issue at hand and why I was oversighting with Cybperpower. I did not mean to cause any disruptive behavior or anymore headaches. I had thought the issue was already resolved previously, as Cybpower had already closed discussions in the articles I was disputing. However, because Cyberpower relied on a different source I just wanted to see if that source was verified. Please take this into consideration that I was only trying to add to Wikipedia's accuracy of sources. Nothing more. I am willing to wait this out if other admins can consider my situation, as I was simply trying to help provide more sources.
Decline reason:
Based on evidence given to me via email by the blocking admin (based on its sensitive nature, it should not be posted here) I am very comfortable with leaving this block in place for the time being. Jayron 32 02:55, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
— Bagumba ( talk) 03:08, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
It is ethically and editorially a very poor idea to contact other people (such as relatives, but in this case, a coworker) who are close to the living subject of an article. Unethical because these people have a right to privacy and we should not seek out information about their lives if it is not readily available (this is the "oversight" WilliamH was talking about). Editorially unusable because even if the subject/coworker/relative/etc answers, it is considered a primary source and therefore does not meet the verifiability criteria to be included. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia where facts are researched from reliable secondary sources are put together, not to be reporters who go out to interview subjects. The correct way is to try and look up for secondary sources (such as magazines), and if this information is not available (in this case, nationality) it should be dropped altogether until a reliable secondary source is found.
If you have any questions, please ask here. Once you have read and understood, place an unblock request and acknowledge this message. - Regards, Mailer Diablo 14:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
PinoyFilAmPride ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Thank you Diablo for taking the time to review the situation. I have read and understand what you have posted regarding oversighting, and I apologize for any rules that I may have broken as well as any further trouble that I may have caused. Again, I tried to resolve the situation directly with Cyberpower and was only questioning his source as well and requesting that he verify his sources prior to making a final decision . However, I believe the issue has been resolved. Thank you for your time and I am requesting to be unblocked and I will not attempt to oversight again PinoyFilAmPride ( talk) 00:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Your account has now been unblocked. The point we want to convey is to be please be sensitive about personal information that has not been made public. Please bear in mind the editorial policies and guidelines on Wikipedia while editing. - Mailer Diablo 04:51, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your input. If you can comment on the three specific proposals at Talk:Jeremy_Lin#Proposal, or propose a new fourth one, it will help to reach consensus on this always fun topic. Thanks.— Bagumba ( talk) 08:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
It might have been a mistake, but you recently posted to the top of Talk:Jeremy Lin. Please post to the bottom to keep things in chronological order and since people notice new items on bottom and not always on top. Also, please sign with four tildes ~~~~ instead of five. Five leaves a timestamp but not your name. Cheers.— Bagumba ( talk) 21:15, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
— Bagumba ( talk) 07:02, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Well, I actually wouldn't mind if the lead mentioned somewhere that he was Filipino; I just thought the previous wording was problematic. I'll think about re-adding something. Zagalejo ^^^ 22:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited KevJumba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 02:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, PinoyFilAmPride. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, PinoyFilAmPride. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, PinoyFilAmPride. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
NBA | This user is a participant in the WikiProject National Basketball Association. |
![]() | This user is a
participant in
WikiProject Mixed martial arts. |
![]() | This user is a
participant in WikiProject Asia. |
![]() | This user
participates in WikiProject Asian Americans. |
![]() |
|
I do not dialogue with eds who revert my messages on talk pages - regardless of whether I am wrong or not - it looked like an overemphasis upon the philipine element - I may well be wrong - but the issue is that in many south east asian articles - unreferenced material stays that way (uncorrected) for much longer periods of time and is not reverted. It is next to impossible to have discussions when messages are deleted. Thats all - cheers Satu Suro 14:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for the report of vandalism. As you have done, the user should be warned, and the warnings escalated - should s/he continue, then reporting this is in order, and that will be followed by a short term of removal of editing rights. I will keep an eye on the user too. Many thanks for helping to keep Wikipedia a source of good information! docboat ( talk) 13:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi.
In this edit, I've recently removed some material you added to the History of the Philippines (Before 1521) article back in May of 2009. It looked to me as if the material had been pretty randomly dropped into the article with little or no regard of the pre-1521 timeframe of the topic of the article, of surrounding context or of WP:MOS and WP:GTL. If you feel that parts of this material does belong in the article, feel free to re-incorporate it but please try to do that a bit more smoothly than was done earlier. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
You are finding good sources of new info. I hope you are not taking my edits and comments personally :-) We look like the main contributors of late so look forward to working with you. Bagumba ( talk) 00:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
UFC 139, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. You are in violation of
WP:3RR if you do not stop and discuss on the article's talk/discussion page, I will report you for blocking. This also pertains to the other article you are fighting about. I will review this information myself and come up with a consensus. —
cyberpower (
Talk to Me)(
Contributions)
00:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Please don't post this everywhere. — cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 00:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
— cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 00:52, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
I have concluded with information on hand that the information on the page regarding his whereabouts, is America. The flag is to remain the way it is now and not be altered to his birth place.— cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 01:06, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi again - many thanks for the heads up regarding the revert issues you mentioned. I see you already have help on board, and if I can contribute I will, but for the moment I will sit and watch quietly. All the best. docboat ( talk) 01:10, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Furthermore, I would like to thank Cyberpower for handling this situation. I am personally shocked how someone believes one picture is 100% proof for everything, when other information provided proved otherwise. Anyways, thanks again for all your time and cooperation PinoyFilAmPride ( talk) 01:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Reverted.— cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 19:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
http://cdn0.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/2307621/11_SilvaLe_09_large.jpg. He literally came out to the 3 stripes, not the current one with one star that the UFC used in the tale of the tape. Also please review the Flag of South Vietnam article, it even states that many Vietnamese immigrants find the current communist flag of Vietnam as offensive. If you will consider exceptions, please at least use the Flag of South Vietnam if you do not want to use the USA one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_South_Vietnam PinoyFilAmPride ( talk) 18:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Would you like me to setup an archive system on your page?— cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 01:37, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
I have bad news. I contacted a coworker of Cung Le. His nationality is Vietnamese where he is represented by a red flag with a yellow star.— cyberpower ( Talk to Me)( Contributions) 01:00, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a
general rule, talk pages such as
User_Talk:Cyberpower678 are for discussion related to improving the article,
not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Do not you my talk page to fight each other. —
cyberpower (
Talk to Me)(
Contributions)
10:28, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
PinoyFilAmPride ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have discussed the issue at hand and why I was oversighting with Cybperpower. I did not mean to cause any disruptive behavior or anymore headaches. I had thought the issue was already resolved previously, as Cybpower had already closed discussions in the articles I was disputing. However, because Cyberpower relied on a different source I just wanted to see if that source was verified. Please take this into consideration that I was only trying to add to Wikipedia's accuracy of sources. Nothing more. I am willing to wait this out if other admins can consider my situation, as I was simply trying to help provide more sources.
Decline reason:
Based on evidence given to me via email by the blocking admin (based on its sensitive nature, it should not be posted here) I am very comfortable with leaving this block in place for the time being. Jayron 32 02:55, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
— Bagumba ( talk) 03:08, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
It is ethically and editorially a very poor idea to contact other people (such as relatives, but in this case, a coworker) who are close to the living subject of an article. Unethical because these people have a right to privacy and we should not seek out information about their lives if it is not readily available (this is the "oversight" WilliamH was talking about). Editorially unusable because even if the subject/coworker/relative/etc answers, it is considered a primary source and therefore does not meet the verifiability criteria to be included. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia where facts are researched from reliable secondary sources are put together, not to be reporters who go out to interview subjects. The correct way is to try and look up for secondary sources (such as magazines), and if this information is not available (in this case, nationality) it should be dropped altogether until a reliable secondary source is found.
If you have any questions, please ask here. Once you have read and understood, place an unblock request and acknowledge this message. - Regards, Mailer Diablo 14:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
PinoyFilAmPride ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Thank you Diablo for taking the time to review the situation. I have read and understand what you have posted regarding oversighting, and I apologize for any rules that I may have broken as well as any further trouble that I may have caused. Again, I tried to resolve the situation directly with Cyberpower and was only questioning his source as well and requesting that he verify his sources prior to making a final decision . However, I believe the issue has been resolved. Thank you for your time and I am requesting to be unblocked and I will not attempt to oversight again PinoyFilAmPride ( talk) 00:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Your account has now been unblocked. The point we want to convey is to be please be sensitive about personal information that has not been made public. Please bear in mind the editorial policies and guidelines on Wikipedia while editing. - Mailer Diablo 04:51, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your input. If you can comment on the three specific proposals at Talk:Jeremy_Lin#Proposal, or propose a new fourth one, it will help to reach consensus on this always fun topic. Thanks.— Bagumba ( talk) 08:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
It might have been a mistake, but you recently posted to the top of Talk:Jeremy Lin. Please post to the bottom to keep things in chronological order and since people notice new items on bottom and not always on top. Also, please sign with four tildes ~~~~ instead of five. Five leaves a timestamp but not your name. Cheers.— Bagumba ( talk) 21:15, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
— Bagumba ( talk) 07:02, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Well, I actually wouldn't mind if the lead mentioned somewhere that he was Filipino; I just thought the previous wording was problematic. I'll think about re-adding something. Zagalejo ^^^ 22:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited KevJumba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 02:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, PinoyFilAmPride. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, PinoyFilAmPride. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, PinoyFilAmPride. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)