Hello there. I suppose this is my talk page, where any current/ongoing/unresolved situations will be discussed. In any event, you can just check my history, for any resolved/finished/dealt with, past archived concerns/discussions. But nothing else to see here. Thank you, and have a great day. :)
Press releases are not generally appropriate sources. Please see WP:RS. -- Yamla ( talk) 11:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The claim in the lede that "With many theories leading that the game demo (and the Vibri character) was not marketable and seen as intrusive and terrifying by game marketers" is not covered in the article, and isn't discussed in the source you added. Can you provide sources to verify this? Waxworker ( talk) 11:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Hurl!, you may be
blocked from editing. --
Belbury (
talk) 18:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
a mistake on a solitary article, though, it's a pattern of editing that you need to take seriously. Your current talk page is three different people telling you to use reliable sources, and in an unblock discussion a few weeks ago you acknowledged "past issues" with not sourcing your edits and said
I assure you, that this will not be a problem anymore, and I am familiar with adding sources to my edits/contributions.
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Belbury (
talk) 10:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music of Dance Dance Revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Loyalmoonie ( talk) 19:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello there. I suppose this is my talk page, where any current/ongoing/unresolved situations will be discussed. In any event, you can just check my history, for any resolved/finished/dealt with, past archived concerns/discussions. But nothing else to see here. Thank you, and have a great day. :)
Press releases are not generally appropriate sources. Please see WP:RS. -- Yamla ( talk) 11:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The claim in the lede that "With many theories leading that the game demo (and the Vibri character) was not marketable and seen as intrusive and terrifying by game marketers" is not covered in the article, and isn't discussed in the source you added. Can you provide sources to verify this? Waxworker ( talk) 11:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Hurl!, you may be
blocked from editing. --
Belbury (
talk) 18:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
a mistake on a solitary article, though, it's a pattern of editing that you need to take seriously. Your current talk page is three different people telling you to use reliable sources, and in an unblock discussion a few weeks ago you acknowledged "past issues" with not sourcing your edits and said
I assure you, that this will not be a problem anymore, and I am familiar with adding sources to my edits/contributions.
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Belbury (
talk) 10:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music of Dance Dance Revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Loyalmoonie ( talk) 19:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)