Your username "देसीफ्राल" is not made with letters in the Latin alphabet. WP:USERNAME says to create a username with letters from the Latin alphabet, so other editors can distinguish your username.---- Dark Tea 06:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Would you be so kind to create a redirect to your user and user talk page in the Latin alphabet? I'd also recommend that you include this Latinised name in your signature, as required by Wikipedia:Signatures#Non-Latin. Mel sa ran 12:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for helping with the missing photo. Although I like the photo of the Austrian woman, it is of an unknown model while the rest of the people have verifiable heritage to a particular nationality or ethnic group. Minor nit. But above all thanks for the support. Cheers! -- Kevin Murray 08:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Please note that Wikipedia policy forbids doing reverts (for example, deletion) more than 3 times within 24 hours. If you violate this rule, your account will be blocked by an administrator. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 12:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[1] You beat me to it! A perfect piece of OR. It is like he is incapable of using sources! I just love how he specified that Lebanon is in Asia. Anyway, let's keep that in mind for the inevitable RFC. The Behnam 04:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
I believe he comprimises the integrity of Wikipedia. Look at his history. If he is like he is in White people article in all other articles, that's really sad for Wikipedia. I believe we have more than enough material about him but I feel lazy about pulling all the evidence together and starting a RFC. Will you be willing to do that? Here is some headstart: [2] I'll ask the same to fourdee. Dbachmann already said, he would sign it but cant be bothered about starting one... KarenAER 11:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Your statement that User:Muntuwandi "needs an indefinite block" on this edit is against WP:CIVIL which says to not call for bans or blocks.---- Dark Tea © 05:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
this is nonsense. The call for a block may or may not have been justified, but calling for a block has nothing to do with incivility. Disruptive users are blocked, that's business as usual around here, nothing to do with WP:CIVIL. dab (𒁳) 11:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello, just to let you know I opened an incident report about your abusive use of vandalism warning templates in what is clearly a content dispute.-- Ramdrake 12:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello, you have been listed as a potential participant in an informal mediation regarding a dispute over White people. The case page is listed at Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2007-08-19_White_people. I am looking over the case, and am willing to offer my assistance in this. If you are willing to participate in the mediation and willing to accept my offer to mediate, please let me know. Thank you, Neranei (talk) 22:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Does that mean you would prefer Hitler over Bush! Seth71 15:20, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Lol, I said I know who I'd choose, you can infer what you like! -- Phral 21:00, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Jeeny Talk 02:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
I have opened a case at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hayden5650 with regards to you. Muntuwandi 07:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Phral. I've been looking into this word, and according to the OED it means "a person with one white and one black parent." [3] But apparently Carol Channing did not claim that her father had one Black and one White parent, she claimed that her father was part African American, so obviously one of her ancestors must have been a mulatto, but it wasn't her father. The OED makes no claim that this is a pejorative term so I think you are right on this point. All the best. Alun 05:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop reverting and accusing me of pushing a POV and that I'm adding shock value. What's so shocking about an outdated term? When that is exactly what the article is about. Not my POV, sheesh. Your's maybe? It is really disruptive when you do this. Please stop. This is the 21st century and this encyclopedia should reflect that. Just like I cannot rely on that old $500 (probably $2000 today) encyclopedia set my mother purchased in the 60s. Most of it is wrong, out of date! We need to keep up with ever changing information to keep it current. You have to learn to live in an ever evolving world. One where technology, medicine and science is constantly advancing and globalization and multiculturalism is growing. :) - Jeeny Talk 07:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Please don't use misleading edit summaries while being the one absent from discussion. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 21:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect. You must not remove the tag from your user page unless there is no evidence page against you, but there is, so it must stay. I'm going to restore it until this issue is worked out. Cheers, The Behnam 22:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Muntuwandi is predictable. He's more amusing than anything, with his attempts at crudely aping the tactics he believes others are using. That bit where he thought the picture of negroes was "poking fun at blacks" is one of the funniest things I've read on wikipedia and it goes to show what he is thinking when he inserts the nonsense images. I think he'll be blocked again soon. -- fourdee ᛇᚹᛟ 02:42, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
You've just been blocked for a period of 24h according to the incident reported at the ANI. Please stop following other users around and revert their sourced edits w/o using neither edit summaries nor talkpage. You were warned twice and that's enough. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 03:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Phral ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm not a sock, it wasn't confirmed. That's not the real reason for this block in any case, and I would like to be unblocked to enable me to file a request at WP:RfC to sort out the issues which have resulted in this block
Decline reason:
You quack like a duck, and you edit from the same area. I think this is conclusive.— gadfium 05:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your username "देसीफ्राल" is not made with letters in the Latin alphabet. WP:USERNAME says to create a username with letters from the Latin alphabet, so other editors can distinguish your username.---- Dark Tea 06:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Would you be so kind to create a redirect to your user and user talk page in the Latin alphabet? I'd also recommend that you include this Latinised name in your signature, as required by Wikipedia:Signatures#Non-Latin. Mel sa ran 12:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for helping with the missing photo. Although I like the photo of the Austrian woman, it is of an unknown model while the rest of the people have verifiable heritage to a particular nationality or ethnic group. Minor nit. But above all thanks for the support. Cheers! -- Kevin Murray 08:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Please note that Wikipedia policy forbids doing reverts (for example, deletion) more than 3 times within 24 hours. If you violate this rule, your account will be blocked by an administrator. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 12:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[1] You beat me to it! A perfect piece of OR. It is like he is incapable of using sources! I just love how he specified that Lebanon is in Asia. Anyway, let's keep that in mind for the inevitable RFC. The Behnam 04:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
I believe he comprimises the integrity of Wikipedia. Look at his history. If he is like he is in White people article in all other articles, that's really sad for Wikipedia. I believe we have more than enough material about him but I feel lazy about pulling all the evidence together and starting a RFC. Will you be willing to do that? Here is some headstart: [2] I'll ask the same to fourdee. Dbachmann already said, he would sign it but cant be bothered about starting one... KarenAER 11:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Your statement that User:Muntuwandi "needs an indefinite block" on this edit is against WP:CIVIL which says to not call for bans or blocks.---- Dark Tea © 05:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
this is nonsense. The call for a block may or may not have been justified, but calling for a block has nothing to do with incivility. Disruptive users are blocked, that's business as usual around here, nothing to do with WP:CIVIL. dab (𒁳) 11:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello, just to let you know I opened an incident report about your abusive use of vandalism warning templates in what is clearly a content dispute.-- Ramdrake 12:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello, you have been listed as a potential participant in an informal mediation regarding a dispute over White people. The case page is listed at Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2007-08-19_White_people. I am looking over the case, and am willing to offer my assistance in this. If you are willing to participate in the mediation and willing to accept my offer to mediate, please let me know. Thank you, Neranei (talk) 22:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Does that mean you would prefer Hitler over Bush! Seth71 15:20, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Lol, I said I know who I'd choose, you can infer what you like! -- Phral 21:00, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Jeeny Talk 02:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
I have opened a case at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hayden5650 with regards to you. Muntuwandi 07:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Phral. I've been looking into this word, and according to the OED it means "a person with one white and one black parent." [3] But apparently Carol Channing did not claim that her father had one Black and one White parent, she claimed that her father was part African American, so obviously one of her ancestors must have been a mulatto, but it wasn't her father. The OED makes no claim that this is a pejorative term so I think you are right on this point. All the best. Alun 05:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop reverting and accusing me of pushing a POV and that I'm adding shock value. What's so shocking about an outdated term? When that is exactly what the article is about. Not my POV, sheesh. Your's maybe? It is really disruptive when you do this. Please stop. This is the 21st century and this encyclopedia should reflect that. Just like I cannot rely on that old $500 (probably $2000 today) encyclopedia set my mother purchased in the 60s. Most of it is wrong, out of date! We need to keep up with ever changing information to keep it current. You have to learn to live in an ever evolving world. One where technology, medicine and science is constantly advancing and globalization and multiculturalism is growing. :) - Jeeny Talk 07:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Please don't use misleading edit summaries while being the one absent from discussion. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 21:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry/Notes for the suspect. You must not remove the tag from your user page unless there is no evidence page against you, but there is, so it must stay. I'm going to restore it until this issue is worked out. Cheers, The Behnam 22:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Muntuwandi is predictable. He's more amusing than anything, with his attempts at crudely aping the tactics he believes others are using. That bit where he thought the picture of negroes was "poking fun at blacks" is one of the funniest things I've read on wikipedia and it goes to show what he is thinking when he inserts the nonsense images. I think he'll be blocked again soon. -- fourdee ᛇᚹᛟ 02:42, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
You've just been blocked for a period of 24h according to the incident reported at the ANI. Please stop following other users around and revert their sourced edits w/o using neither edit summaries nor talkpage. You were warned twice and that's enough. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 03:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Phral ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm not a sock, it wasn't confirmed. That's not the real reason for this block in any case, and I would like to be unblocked to enable me to file a request at WP:RfC to sort out the issues which have resulted in this block
Decline reason:
You quack like a duck, and you edit from the same area. I think this is conclusive.— gadfium 05:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.