Collingwood Football Club logo|700px
Please desist. Thankyou. Timeshift ( talk) 04:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Philwalker87, thanks for your suggestion to include attribution for the opinion piece I cited in the Trujillo article. I think citing Costello improves it a lot. It now fits in with Wikipedia:Rs#Statements_of_opinion Ozdaren ( talk) 05:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that your edit to the article Solomon Trujillo possibly violates the W/P guidelines on copyright by including material lifted directly from the Australian Newspaper article Trujillo's 'racist, backward' claims dismissed as sour grapes. I have made some alterations to avoid this situation. Ozdaren ( talk) 13:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
One of the tenets of W/P you cite is Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. But you seeming fail to grasp the meaning of it. Here is a but a part of it "Note that this process must be used with care and diplomacy; some editors will see it as a challenge, so be considerate and patient." Descending into personal attacks is not part of this. Ozdaren ( talk) 22:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
But for inclusion they should have something to raise them above a normal crime. I'll put something on talk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsloch ( talk • contribs) 23:09, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Collingwood Football Club logo|700px
Please desist. Thankyou. Timeshift ( talk) 04:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Philwalker87, thanks for your suggestion to include attribution for the opinion piece I cited in the Trujillo article. I think citing Costello improves it a lot. It now fits in with Wikipedia:Rs#Statements_of_opinion Ozdaren ( talk) 05:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that your edit to the article Solomon Trujillo possibly violates the W/P guidelines on copyright by including material lifted directly from the Australian Newspaper article Trujillo's 'racist, backward' claims dismissed as sour grapes. I have made some alterations to avoid this situation. Ozdaren ( talk) 13:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
One of the tenets of W/P you cite is Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. But you seeming fail to grasp the meaning of it. Here is a but a part of it "Note that this process must be used with care and diplomacy; some editors will see it as a challenge, so be considerate and patient." Descending into personal attacks is not part of this. Ozdaren ( talk) 22:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
But for inclusion they should have something to raise them above a normal crime. I'll put something on talk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsloch ( talk • contribs) 23:09, 15 June 2009 (UTC)