you are saying it is not relevant , the views of backers - but GHouta says it does matter. they are shadowy figures , exept odeh muhaweh and his daughter in law he is setting up - the bloke appears to be a serios Shia 12 er or summat with virulent anti Syrian rebel views- if you say how is that relevant to the ghouta story being promoted by mintpress news you are obviously being disingenuous. there is now just one sentence on the PJ media story - hardly undue. please show a little tolerance and not allow a desire to destroy all comment on the mintpressnews. that is not the purpose of articles I don't think. goodbye spa. Sayerslle ( talk) 18:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Philip Stained Glass, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
VQuakr (
talk)
19:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Philip Stained Glass! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
VQuakr ( talk) 23:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
Mint Press News. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. VQuakr ( talk) 07:05, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
you are saying it is not relevant , the views of backers - but GHouta says it does matter. they are shadowy figures , exept odeh muhaweh and his daughter in law he is setting up - the bloke appears to be a serios Shia 12 er or summat with virulent anti Syrian rebel views- if you say how is that relevant to the ghouta story being promoted by mintpress news you are obviously being disingenuous. there is now just one sentence on the PJ media story - hardly undue. please show a little tolerance and not allow a desire to destroy all comment on the mintpressnews. that is not the purpose of articles I don't think. goodbye spa. Sayerslle ( talk) 18:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Philip Stained Glass, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
VQuakr (
talk)
19:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Philip Stained Glass! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
VQuakr ( talk) 23:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
Mint Press News. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. VQuakr ( talk) 07:05, 19 September 2013 (UTC)