I just recently started Wikiproject Cooperation and I thought you would be interested. Thanks for your time. Silver seren C 01:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
It appears that, despite the group's statement that they are looking for people with a variety of different backgrounds, my request to join has been rejected on Facebook. This despite the fact that I am a journalist who could contribute to and benefit from the group. Have you any thoughts as to why my request to join the group was not accepted and/or things I could do to better my chances of being accepted into the group? Thanks! Ebikeguy ( talk) 17:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Phil, I commented on your blog but don't know if you saw it. I've been working out a solution to the issue with PR professionals editing Wikipedia, and have written an essay detailing the headway I've made and the solution I came up with. I'd be interested in your opinion, and whether or not you think its a step in the right direction. Thanks! I'm Tony Ahn ( talk) 02:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
"exploring the ways that PR and Wikipedia can work together for mutual benefit, defined narrowly as cooperation toward more accurate and balanced entries"
I just thought I'd drop you a note that this is a far more welcomed objective than what it seems to have been in the past. Glad to see it go in this direction if that is the case. Cheers. User:King4057 (COI Disclosure on User Page) 22:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
I hope all goes well with your presentation at the conference. It'll be interesting to see if it spurs any more news articles. Silver seren C 06:31, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I suggested the creation of an on-Wikipedia "suggestion box" for CREWE, where folks can make public suggestions to the group. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperation#Tasks. Thanks! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 14:59, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Phil, I left a message in the
suggestion box about a false statement about myself that was published on your facebook CREWE group. Let me be clear: It's time for YOU and the other members of that facebook group to clean up your(collective) act, immmediately. I expect action on this, otherwise I don't see how I could ever see CREWE as more then just a silly, ineffective joke. --
Eclipsed
(talk)
(COI Declaration)
20:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Phil, I left a message in the suggestion box about an issue I feel needs attention. Could you assist in clearing up this matter? -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration)
Hi Philgomes. I've added a message to your note here that you might be able to help with. Cheers, Lindsay Hello 04:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
I've thought of an idea that might break our current logjam with paid editing. I'd love your sincere feedback and opinion.
Feel free to circulate this to anyone you think should know about it, but please recognize that it hasn't agreed upon by either PR organizations or WikiProjects or the wider community. It's also just a draft, so any/many changes can still be made. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot ( talk) 15:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
I just recently started Wikiproject Cooperation and I thought you would be interested. Thanks for your time. Silver seren C 01:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
It appears that, despite the group's statement that they are looking for people with a variety of different backgrounds, my request to join has been rejected on Facebook. This despite the fact that I am a journalist who could contribute to and benefit from the group. Have you any thoughts as to why my request to join the group was not accepted and/or things I could do to better my chances of being accepted into the group? Thanks! Ebikeguy ( talk) 17:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Phil, I commented on your blog but don't know if you saw it. I've been working out a solution to the issue with PR professionals editing Wikipedia, and have written an essay detailing the headway I've made and the solution I came up with. I'd be interested in your opinion, and whether or not you think its a step in the right direction. Thanks! I'm Tony Ahn ( talk) 02:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
"exploring the ways that PR and Wikipedia can work together for mutual benefit, defined narrowly as cooperation toward more accurate and balanced entries"
I just thought I'd drop you a note that this is a far more welcomed objective than what it seems to have been in the past. Glad to see it go in this direction if that is the case. Cheers. User:King4057 (COI Disclosure on User Page) 22:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
I hope all goes well with your presentation at the conference. It'll be interesting to see if it spurs any more news articles. Silver seren C 06:31, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I suggested the creation of an on-Wikipedia "suggestion box" for CREWE, where folks can make public suggestions to the group. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperation#Tasks. Thanks! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 14:59, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Phil, I left a message in the
suggestion box about a false statement about myself that was published on your facebook CREWE group. Let me be clear: It's time for YOU and the other members of that facebook group to clean up your(collective) act, immmediately. I expect action on this, otherwise I don't see how I could ever see CREWE as more then just a silly, ineffective joke. --
Eclipsed
(talk)
(COI Declaration)
20:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Phil, I left a message in the suggestion box about an issue I feel needs attention. Could you assist in clearing up this matter? -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration)
Hi Philgomes. I've added a message to your note here that you might be able to help with. Cheers, Lindsay Hello 04:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
I've thought of an idea that might break our current logjam with paid editing. I'd love your sincere feedback and opinion.
Feel free to circulate this to anyone you think should know about it, but please recognize that it hasn't agreed upon by either PR organizations or WikiProjects or the wider community. It's also just a draft, so any/many changes can still be made. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot ( talk) 15:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |