![]() |
Hi PhilHist15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC) |
I see that at User:Inangpintor you posted a notice saying that the editor was blocked. Since the editor has in fact never been blocked, and in any case you are not an administrator, so that yo can't block accounts, was this a mistake? The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 17:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Indigenouism Art requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T 20:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PhilHist15. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
21:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hi PhilHist15! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC) |
I see that at User:Inangpintor you posted a notice saying that the editor was blocked. Since the editor has in fact never been blocked, and in any case you are not an administrator, so that yo can't block accounts, was this a mistake? The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 17:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Indigenouism Art requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T 20:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PhilHist15. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
21:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |