Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Matthead 12:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Please stop reverting the Jim Clark article. I believe that you are adding POV which is unnecessary. If you would like to make some constructive changes, please do so by opening a dialogue at Talk:Jim Clark. Reverting does no one good, by through dialogue, a compromise may be reached.-- Brian G 19:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Multiple edits as you did to the Jim Clark article is just a multiple revert under another name and IS unacceptable. Please take this to Talk:Jim Clark where it can be progressed in a manner acceptable to all Wikipedians and not just you. M100 08:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
There are anonymous edits on Jim Clark that would appear identical to the ones you were recently perfoming on a very regular basis. Please discuss the prospective changes in Talk:Jim Clark otherwise your continuing editing/reversion of this article might be considered vandalism. M100 11:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- If you want to edit the Jim Clark page, please do so without arbitrarily deleting work that other people have done. If you do not agree with what someone has written, discuss it on the discussion page. The results table and the infobox that you insist on deleting are an integral part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Formula One and will be reinstated every time you delete them. Please don't waste people's time. Bretonbanquet 14:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- After Midnight 0001 19:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. M100 20:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding reversions [1] made on September 17 2006 to Jim Clark
 |
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. |
I've blocked you again because your sock got blocked for 3RR. Please stick to one account William M. Connolley 18:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 08:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten, and you are therefore blocked for period of one week. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. |
|
Kil o• T 19:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
|
|
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (2nd), and you are therefore blocked for period of one month. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. |
|
Kil o• T 21:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (3rd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. M100 01:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (4th) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 05:57, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (4th) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 19:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
The block on this account has been extended to 3 months for sockpuppetry, disruption, and violations of WP:OWN. The use of sockpuppets to evade a user block can result in banning a user from Wikipedia. Durov a Charge! 14:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (5th) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 09:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Your block has been extended to indefinite for continued sockpuppetry. Durov a Charge! 17:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pflanzgarten for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Baseball Watcher 23:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Matthead 12:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Please stop reverting the Jim Clark article. I believe that you are adding POV which is unnecessary. If you would like to make some constructive changes, please do so by opening a dialogue at Talk:Jim Clark. Reverting does no one good, by through dialogue, a compromise may be reached.-- Brian G 19:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Multiple edits as you did to the Jim Clark article is just a multiple revert under another name and IS unacceptable. Please take this to Talk:Jim Clark where it can be progressed in a manner acceptable to all Wikipedians and not just you. M100 08:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
There are anonymous edits on Jim Clark that would appear identical to the ones you were recently perfoming on a very regular basis. Please discuss the prospective changes in Talk:Jim Clark otherwise your continuing editing/reversion of this article might be considered vandalism. M100 11:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- If you want to edit the Jim Clark page, please do so without arbitrarily deleting work that other people have done. If you do not agree with what someone has written, discuss it on the discussion page. The results table and the infobox that you insist on deleting are an integral part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Formula One and will be reinstated every time you delete them. Please don't waste people's time. Bretonbanquet 14:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- After Midnight 0001 19:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. M100 20:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Regarding reversions [1] made on September 17 2006 to Jim Clark
|
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. |
I've blocked you again because your sock got blocked for 3RR. Please stick to one account William M. Connolley 18:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 08:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
|
|
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten, and you are therefore blocked for period of one week. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. |
|
Kil o• T 19:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
|
|
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (2nd), and you are therefore blocked for period of one month. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. |
|
Kil o• T 21:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (3rd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. M100 01:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (4th) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 05:57, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (4th) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 19:51, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
The block on this account has been extended to 3 months for sockpuppetry, disruption, and violations of WP:OWN. The use of sockpuppets to evade a user block can result in banning a user from Wikipedia. Durov a Charge! 14:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pflanzgarten (5th) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 09:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Your block has been extended to indefinite for continued sockpuppetry. Durov a Charge! 17:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pflanzgarten for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Baseball Watcher 23:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC)