Reformulated:
Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Wikipedia operates off of objective information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include subjective information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Wikipedia may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf. Indigo children).
You may also want to read User:Ian.thomson/ChristianityAndNPOV. We at Wikipedia are highbrow ( snobby), heavily biased for the academia. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 10:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 20:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, including your edits to
Protochronism, but we cannot accept
original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
09:10, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a
general rule, talk pages such as
Talk:Protochronism are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines,
not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
04:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from using talk pages such as
Talk:Protochronism for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines; they are
not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See
here for more information. Thank you. Per
WP:NOTFREESPEECH we are not interested in opinions which have nothing to do with improving the article. Take such opinions to your own blog, Wikipedia is neither blog nor internet forum.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
19:55, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Petre Pascu,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as
Honved2018 (
talk ·
contribs). Our
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be
blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
05:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Reformulated:
Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Wikipedia operates off of objective information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include subjective information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Wikipedia may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf. Indigo children).
You may also want to read User:Ian.thomson/ChristianityAndNPOV. We at Wikipedia are highbrow ( snobby), heavily biased for the academia. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 10:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 20:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, including your edits to
Protochronism, but we cannot accept
original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
09:10, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a
general rule, talk pages such as
Talk:Protochronism are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines,
not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
04:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from using talk pages such as
Talk:Protochronism for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines; they are
not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See
here for more information. Thank you. Per
WP:NOTFREESPEECH we are not interested in opinions which have nothing to do with improving the article. Take such opinions to your own blog, Wikipedia is neither blog nor internet forum.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
19:55, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Petre Pascu,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as
Honved2018 (
talk ·
contribs). Our
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be
blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.
Tgeorgescu (
talk)
05:49, 9 January 2018 (UTC)