User:Wizardry Dragon/Templates/UserTalkPageArchive
Archived Discussion
|
It's obviously not vandalising. Please refer to talk:Qingzang railway for details. :-) — Insta ntnood 16:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Dear User:Wizardry_Dragon,
I would like to share a dispute with you in short.
A user User:Marwatt, is keep on changing any edits made on article Marwat, if the editing doesn't fits "his standard". Instead of going through Wikipedia's policy, he has started the personal enmity.
I am a sort of strict person from behaviour. So instead of approaching any Administrators first, I started doing something against WP policy, as I was unaware of policies. That even led me to be banned by a fellow administrator. But I still have sympathy for that administrator, even I think it was unfair.
Now, when I understood that I must approach to Administrators, I found you the best as you yourself are the one who wish to make WP a neutral and free of disputes. As it seems that I will get a justice from you, like I hope the same from User:Addhoc, a very good and calm administrator.
I assure and challenge, with vow and guarantee that if you overview whole of the case and discuss some points, you will really find USer: Marwatt guilty for making WP un-neutral and un-accurate.
Once again, I would like to make a plea to you and User: Addhoc that you both be a third party and overview the case by giving all of us (The both parties) to clarify their claims and disputes.
You be the judge and provide the justice.
Now you better understand that if I feel I am guilty I will never demand you to be a third party nor will make a challenge and nor will discuss my edits on Talk Page of Marwat, as User: Marwatt who is not discussing any edits on the Talk Page even after requested by USer: Addhoc.
Regards, Begger of Justice,
A M. Khan 17:34, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
You've had this deleted article in your userspace for a month and haven't edited it. Do you still need it? -- Sam Blanning (talk) 00:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I note that you're involved in Ultima (and I take it from your username that you're a fellow Dragon), so I thought I might ask if you'd be interested in checking over List of Ultima characters, an article which I've just created. The tables have lots of blank entries which are due to my faulty memory and my never having played Akalabeth or the two Underworlds. — Psychonaut 19:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Since you're involved with the Neutrality Project, I thought I'd ask if there's any way of encouraging people to check an article for bias/neutrality besides slapping a {{POV-check}} on the page. I've browsed through the category for that template and note that lots of the articles were tagged months ago but haven't garnered any comments. Isn't a list-type page like Wikipedia:Peer review which deals with POV checks? Or perhaps, as the head of the Neutrality Project, you know of someone in the Project who would be willing to review the political page I just self-nominated? — Psychonaut 19:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Stop using VP2 when users are trying to solve editing disputes. Your use of VP2 is becoming a loose cannon and to think you said you'd stop using it in a previous talk here! Idleguy 20:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
One does not solve editing disputes by a Revert war. See WP:3RR. -- Wizardry Dragon ( Talk to Me) ( Support Neutrality on Wikipedia) 20:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your sincere advice on my talk page. I definitely know that my reverting of edits could be seen as proving a point but exactly the same goes for the other person ( User:A M. Khan). He and his few other sock puppets are trying to push POV entries in several articles and I have filed a case for checking his sock puppets and their vandalism (check the RFCU page over here [1]). I think you should try to see the whole issue in its entirety as this User:A M. Khan was earlier on banned as well for using abusive language and vandalizing the article on Marwat by administrator [User:The JPS]. I am just trying to revert his POV entries such as inserting the names of non-entities who does not fulfill the criteria of WP:BIO. His POV entry of Akhtar Munir Marwat is a glaring example of this as he and his other sock puppets also tried to create a separate page for this gentleman and which was eventually deleted after a consensus (check the deletion log over here [2]). I am a sensible editor and repeatedly trying to tell this other user in a civil way that this entry does not fulfill the criteria of WP:BIO on the discussion page of Marwat but instead the other user became abusive (check the discussion page over here [3]). So keep faith that whatever I am doing is for the integrity of Wikipedia. Once again thank you for your concern and I hope that this clarifies certain points in your mind. -- Marwatt 22:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
for the disruption on the help desk. Sorry Chris
User:Wizardry Dragon/Templates/UserTalkPageArchive
Archived Discussion
|
It's obviously not vandalising. Please refer to talk:Qingzang railway for details. :-) — Insta ntnood 16:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Dear User:Wizardry_Dragon,
I would like to share a dispute with you in short.
A user User:Marwatt, is keep on changing any edits made on article Marwat, if the editing doesn't fits "his standard". Instead of going through Wikipedia's policy, he has started the personal enmity.
I am a sort of strict person from behaviour. So instead of approaching any Administrators first, I started doing something against WP policy, as I was unaware of policies. That even led me to be banned by a fellow administrator. But I still have sympathy for that administrator, even I think it was unfair.
Now, when I understood that I must approach to Administrators, I found you the best as you yourself are the one who wish to make WP a neutral and free of disputes. As it seems that I will get a justice from you, like I hope the same from User:Addhoc, a very good and calm administrator.
I assure and challenge, with vow and guarantee that if you overview whole of the case and discuss some points, you will really find USer: Marwatt guilty for making WP un-neutral and un-accurate.
Once again, I would like to make a plea to you and User: Addhoc that you both be a third party and overview the case by giving all of us (The both parties) to clarify their claims and disputes.
You be the judge and provide the justice.
Now you better understand that if I feel I am guilty I will never demand you to be a third party nor will make a challenge and nor will discuss my edits on Talk Page of Marwat, as User: Marwatt who is not discussing any edits on the Talk Page even after requested by USer: Addhoc.
Regards, Begger of Justice,
A M. Khan 17:34, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
You've had this deleted article in your userspace for a month and haven't edited it. Do you still need it? -- Sam Blanning (talk) 00:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I note that you're involved in Ultima (and I take it from your username that you're a fellow Dragon), so I thought I might ask if you'd be interested in checking over List of Ultima characters, an article which I've just created. The tables have lots of blank entries which are due to my faulty memory and my never having played Akalabeth or the two Underworlds. — Psychonaut 19:07, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Since you're involved with the Neutrality Project, I thought I'd ask if there's any way of encouraging people to check an article for bias/neutrality besides slapping a {{POV-check}} on the page. I've browsed through the category for that template and note that lots of the articles were tagged months ago but haven't garnered any comments. Isn't a list-type page like Wikipedia:Peer review which deals with POV checks? Or perhaps, as the head of the Neutrality Project, you know of someone in the Project who would be willing to review the political page I just self-nominated? — Psychonaut 19:23, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Stop using VP2 when users are trying to solve editing disputes. Your use of VP2 is becoming a loose cannon and to think you said you'd stop using it in a previous talk here! Idleguy 20:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
One does not solve editing disputes by a Revert war. See WP:3RR. -- Wizardry Dragon ( Talk to Me) ( Support Neutrality on Wikipedia) 20:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your sincere advice on my talk page. I definitely know that my reverting of edits could be seen as proving a point but exactly the same goes for the other person ( User:A M. Khan). He and his few other sock puppets are trying to push POV entries in several articles and I have filed a case for checking his sock puppets and their vandalism (check the RFCU page over here [1]). I think you should try to see the whole issue in its entirety as this User:A M. Khan was earlier on banned as well for using abusive language and vandalizing the article on Marwat by administrator [User:The JPS]. I am just trying to revert his POV entries such as inserting the names of non-entities who does not fulfill the criteria of WP:BIO. His POV entry of Akhtar Munir Marwat is a glaring example of this as he and his other sock puppets also tried to create a separate page for this gentleman and which was eventually deleted after a consensus (check the deletion log over here [2]). I am a sensible editor and repeatedly trying to tell this other user in a civil way that this entry does not fulfill the criteria of WP:BIO on the discussion page of Marwat but instead the other user became abusive (check the discussion page over here [3]). So keep faith that whatever I am doing is for the integrity of Wikipedia. Once again thank you for your concern and I hope that this clarifies certain points in your mind. -- Marwatt 22:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
for the disruption on the help desk. Sorry Chris