I have reverted to the version with the paragraph regarding MacArthur's views on Catholicism in paragraph form. Hokie RNB 03:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
John F. MacArthur. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Ἀλήθεια (
talk)
10:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Parks,Chesin and Walbert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --
Big
Dom
20:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edit to the page
Maureen Dowd appears to have added incorrect information and has been
reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be
verifiable in a
reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please
cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's
talk page. Please use the
sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the
welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.
Viriditas (
talk)
05:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Maureen Dowd. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Viriditas (
talk)
02:07, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
I reverted your user page to a previous version as the current version did not appear to match your contribs and I was concerned that your account had been compromised. You may want to reset your password with a combination of letters and numbers. Thanks. Viriditas ( talk) 11:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
I have reverted to the version with the paragraph regarding MacArthur's views on Catholicism in paragraph form. Hokie RNB 03:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
John F. MacArthur. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Ἀλήθεια (
talk)
10:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Parks,Chesin and Walbert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --
Big
Dom
20:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edit to the page
Maureen Dowd appears to have added incorrect information and has been
reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be
verifiable in a
reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please
cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's
talk page. Please use the
sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the
welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.
Viriditas (
talk)
05:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Maureen Dowd. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Viriditas (
talk)
02:07, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
I reverted your user page to a previous version as the current version did not appear to match your contribs and I was concerned that your account had been compromised. You may want to reset your password with a combination of letters and numbers. Thanks. Viriditas ( talk) 11:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)