The truth will prevail!!!
There is a fairly well-organized cabal of pro-Pakistan lobbyists there [1] Ontopofcosts ( talk) 19:02, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
unless you wake up and stop deleting pakistani views section from Kashmir conflict and adding your own hindu nationalist info and twisting my sources e.g bbc you have no hope of reaching conensus p.s stop twisting the sources i provide and giving a pro india stance its called vandalism Algebraic123 ( talk) 19:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
I agree . most points in Pakistan view are unreferenced and ought to be deleted. cheers ;)
BTW the link to resolution 1172 is broken. try linking it to the document at undemocracy website —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.76.172 ( talk) 01:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
The previous article material was only one side of the picture, based on advocating Sadhvi Pragya Singh's case and proving her to be a 'Faultless Person'. She is one of the prime accused of the Malegaon bomb blast. There is a great debate on her involvement in Terrorist activities. I have added the fact based material, all with proper references. So please do not try to use this article as a propaganda tool, in favor of Sadhvi Pragya Singh. IndiGenious ( talk) 14:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
good job on the
Kashmir Conflict article. their are several pro pakistan contributors who are trying to give undue weight to pakistani viewpoint and vandalize the NPOV. this is clearly against wikipedia policy of undue weight. cheers
Wikireader41 (
talk) 16:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
The truth will prevail!!!
There is a fairly well-organized cabal of pro-Pakistan lobbyists there [1] Ontopofcosts ( talk) 19:02, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
unless you wake up and stop deleting pakistani views section from Kashmir conflict and adding your own hindu nationalist info and twisting my sources e.g bbc you have no hope of reaching conensus p.s stop twisting the sources i provide and giving a pro india stance its called vandalism Algebraic123 ( talk) 19:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
I agree . most points in Pakistan view are unreferenced and ought to be deleted. cheers ;)
BTW the link to resolution 1172 is broken. try linking it to the document at undemocracy website —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.76.172 ( talk) 01:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
The previous article material was only one side of the picture, based on advocating Sadhvi Pragya Singh's case and proving her to be a 'Faultless Person'. She is one of the prime accused of the Malegaon bomb blast. There is a great debate on her involvement in Terrorist activities. I have added the fact based material, all with proper references. So please do not try to use this article as a propaganda tool, in favor of Sadhvi Pragya Singh. IndiGenious ( talk) 14:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
good job on the
Kashmir Conflict article. their are several pro pakistan contributors who are trying to give undue weight to pakistani viewpoint and vandalize the NPOV. this is clearly against wikipedia policy of undue weight. cheers
Wikireader41 (
talk) 16:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC)