|
Hi Paul1580! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:22, 5 August 2015 (UTC) |
|
The Citation Barnstar | |
| For the hard work of finding and adding sources where they were sorely lacking. 2601:188:0:ABE6:88C9:71A8:B3A9:1FC6 ( talk) 23:22, 8 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Why are you removing categories from Elmhurst College categories? -- Bamyers99 ( talk) 22:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Paul1580. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Paul1580. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please don't capitalize common nouns in articles. More specifically, if it's not being used as part of a longer, official title, "university" is a common noun that should not be capitalized on its own. Thanks! ElKevbo ( talk) 13:28, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Yes, and thank you so much for your help today as we officially become Elmhurst University. We were asked to wait until today to update our Wikipedia article and I discovered there were many things out of date that needed to be changed (personnel, office relocations, etc.) Your assistance is greatly appreciated! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul1580 ( talk • contribs) 11:09, July 1, 2020 (UTC)
- You're welcome.
- If you work for the university - your response above gives the impression that you do - then you must review our policies regarding paid editing and conflicts of interest. In brief, if you're being paid to edit an article then you must disclose that fact. If you have a relationship with a subject, you should exercise caution in editing that subject's article(s). I recommend reading those policies, clearly declaring your relationship, and avoiding making any substantive edits to that article and related articles; instead of making edits directly, you can always make requests and suggestions in the article Talk page(s) so other editors without a conflict of interest can review them and carry them out. ElKevbo ( talk) 15:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Got it. Believe me, I am more than happy to request any future changes to the article in the Talk page as you request to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest. Doesn't matter to me who makes the changes, just that the article remain accurate and verifiable, nothing more. Before I started making changes, there were all of nine notes and references (most of them self-references), and "warning labels" kept appearing, like these below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080216001718/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elmhurst_College
https://web.archive.org/web/20090527123139/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elmhurst_College
I have since added over 170 outside citations to prove that the the article is factual, not fluff. After that, the "warning labels" disappeared, and I received a Citation Barnstar. That's important to me, accuracy. While I do have an association with the university, I am not being paid or compensated for updating the article, nor was I asked to by anyone, nor did anyone ever suggest I should. It's an interesting hobby at most, but again, I'll refrain from making any future changes myself and request them through the Talk page since the very last thing I want to happen is have the article censored somehow despite having gone through great lengths to make sure there are proper citations so no more "warning labels" pop up.
Thanks for the advice. Paul1580 ( talk) 18:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
|
Hi Paul1580! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:22, 5 August 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
The Citation Barnstar | |
| For the hard work of finding and adding sources where they were sorely lacking. 2601:188:0:ABE6:88C9:71A8:B3A9:1FC6 ( talk) 23:22, 8 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Why are you removing categories from Elmhurst College categories? -- Bamyers99 ( talk) 22:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Paul1580. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Paul1580. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please don't capitalize common nouns in articles. More specifically, if it's not being used as part of a longer, official title, "university" is a common noun that should not be capitalized on its own. Thanks! ElKevbo ( talk) 13:28, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Yes, and thank you so much for your help today as we officially become Elmhurst University. We were asked to wait until today to update our Wikipedia article and I discovered there were many things out of date that needed to be changed (personnel, office relocations, etc.) Your assistance is greatly appreciated! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul1580 ( talk • contribs) 11:09, July 1, 2020 (UTC)
- You're welcome.
- If you work for the university - your response above gives the impression that you do - then you must review our policies regarding paid editing and conflicts of interest. In brief, if you're being paid to edit an article then you must disclose that fact. If you have a relationship with a subject, you should exercise caution in editing that subject's article(s). I recommend reading those policies, clearly declaring your relationship, and avoiding making any substantive edits to that article and related articles; instead of making edits directly, you can always make requests and suggestions in the article Talk page(s) so other editors without a conflict of interest can review them and carry them out. ElKevbo ( talk) 15:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Got it. Believe me, I am more than happy to request any future changes to the article in the Talk page as you request to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest. Doesn't matter to me who makes the changes, just that the article remain accurate and verifiable, nothing more. Before I started making changes, there were all of nine notes and references (most of them self-references), and "warning labels" kept appearing, like these below:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080216001718/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elmhurst_College
https://web.archive.org/web/20090527123139/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elmhurst_College
I have since added over 170 outside citations to prove that the the article is factual, not fluff. After that, the "warning labels" disappeared, and I received a Citation Barnstar. That's important to me, accuracy. While I do have an association with the university, I am not being paid or compensated for updating the article, nor was I asked to by anyone, nor did anyone ever suggest I should. It's an interesting hobby at most, but again, I'll refrain from making any future changes myself and request them through the Talk page since the very last thing I want to happen is have the article censored somehow despite having gone through great lengths to make sure there are proper citations so no more "warning labels" pop up.
Thanks for the advice. Paul1580 ( talk) 18:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |