This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Comparison between Roman and Han Empires. Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 02:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC) (Using {{ Please see}})
You are invited to join the discussion at [ AFD] for Comparison between Roman and Han Empires, since you have participated in the last AFD. Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 23:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Comparison between Roman and Han Empires. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison between Roman and Han Empires (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:18, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Comparisons between Roman and Han Empires has been completely restructured per your and others' advice, with scholarly sources comparing the two only. Please take a look. Teeninvestor ( talk) 21:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
You mentioned in a message to Flint McRae ( talk · contribs · count) that you had merged the content of ISMTII to International Committee on Measurements and Instrumentation. Another editor, Tnxman307 ( talk · contribs · count), deleted International Committee on Measurements and Instrumentation. If you disagree with the deletion, you may want to discuss this with Tnxman307. - Eastmain ( talk) 03:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
The
November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 19:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I commented at AN/I just as you blocked this user. While you're unrequestionably within policy to do so, I'm not certain that this block is necessary at this time. I'll be blunt. Zensurfer is SPA who has been watching and editing the Robert Dickinson article which currently is up for deletion. Zensurfer, at minimum, appears to be close to the subject of that article. The article was vandalized, Zensurfer reverts claiming its on behalf of the subject, then the subject asks for deletion through OTRS. The vandal is blocked, and the AfD currently is unanimous for "delete". As the considerably less guilty party, I'm don't think a block at this time really de-escalates anything (especially if Zensurfer is, or really is close to, the subject of the article. I propose a refactoring the threat and an admonishment on the talk page. Still, as you are within policy, I'll respect your decision either way. Take care, Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 23:44, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I wish to contest the deletion of the article of 'Einy Shah'. I was told by someone called Kyle that there should be more links from ind newspapers or magazines. And, that it should be about the subject more. I done this. I posted support links and references from a London based newspaper of which Einy Shah & team were featured. A full BBC feature on their website. And a feature from a gossip magazine.
I do think Einy Shah is a noteable enough person and part of the reason creating the page was because of high demand. I've also created pages for 3 other journalists in the same group. There pages are fine, it's only this one causing any trouble.
Would approeciate it of you could advise me on how to retrieve this page.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.194.114 ( talk) 23:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
see here. and here. There are also earlier examples, but this one is over the edge. He has no respect for his fellow editors. Teeninvestor ( talk) 23:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
The second AFD of Comparison between Roman and Han Empires, resulted in the article being stubbified and the contents moved to Wikipedia:Article Incubator:Comparison between Roman and Han Empires. You are welcome to make suggestions at the article in the incubator. If your concerns are meet, and you believe the article is ready for mainspace, please sign here [1], or contact User:Spartaz, the closing admin. Thank you. Teeninvestor ( talk) 20:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Patar knight - please don't remove {{ uncatstub}} templates from articles only categorised as stubs, as you did here unless you are adding permanent categories to them! Articles need to be categorised in permanent categories, not just cleanup and stub categories, which is why {{ uncatstub}} exists. As the template says, "This article is uncategorized. Please help improve this article by adding it to one or more categories, in addition to a stub category." (my emphasis.) Grutness... wha? 23:55, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello, you blocked this user, citing a username policy breach. Please justify why this is a breach of the username policy. It certainly could be a standard username, "Freeman" is a common last name. The user has no contributions to act as evidence for bad faith, so could you please clarify why the user should remain indef blocked? Thank you, The Userboxer Complain/ ubx 03:34, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
The
December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 04:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
It's current, it's biography, it's military theme, what do you think about it: George Miok? I put a wikiProject Canada template onto the talp page of this article. I try to protect this article from the deletion. -- Eino81 ( talk) 01:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello Patar knight. You are receiving this notice because you have either supported or posted constructive suggestions during my recent self-nominated RFA, submitted on 18-01-2010. Please do spend a few minutes to read my comments on the nomination, and feel free to respond on the relevant talkpage for any further comments or questions. Thank you for participating. Regards. Rehman( +) 15:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
theres 6 denominations in islam
but only 4 are showing in the purple 'islam topics' template box at the bottom of the 'islam' page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafi
thats denomination 1 for Salafi's
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qur%27an_alone
thats denomination 2 for Quranists
could you try your best to add these two please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jigglyfidders ( talk • contribs) 05:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
The
January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 04:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your work on the 2010 Olympics opening ceremonies page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordandrei ( talk • contribs) 05:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your excellent efforts on the 2010 Winter Olympics opening ceremony page. Especially showing excellence in keeping to Wikipedia format under quick edits -- Lordandrei ( talk) 16:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC) |
I've been doing that all evening before you started editing the article and I've been trying to rework the Sochi part but can't since you keep editing. Therefore, I suggest that instead of simply removing the material you take the responsibility of rewriting it.
Rather than stepping in and telling someone else they're doing it wrong it's more productive and collegial to correct the problem and rewrite the material. That's always more polite and constructive than simply reverting and ordering a rewrite as if other editors work for you. I'm done. Rewrite the Sochi material yourself.
I'm sorry, I'm done and what you've left is woefully inadequate. I suggest you google some sources as news articles are up. In future rewrite instead of reverting. Doing ther former communicates a rather negative attitude as if you think other editors work for you. Also, in future look at the history. If you did that you would have seen that the unoriginal material was being rewritten and expanded as the live event unfolded. Instead you blundered in like a bull in a china shop who breaks things and expects others to clean up rather than chip in and help out.
I would sign my posts if my mobile's keyboard had a tilda key. My point stands, it's better to fix something then to tear it down and tell someone else to do it over. If you are going to criticize something than take the responsibility to complete the job rather than leaving it undone. You took on the responsibility now finish the job.
Since I'm on a mobile trying to write an article on a live event I couldn't use an external word processor or multiple browser screens. In the time you took to argue with me you could have rewritten the section. Anyway my thumbs are tired so I'm logging out now.
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the
coordinator academy course and in the
responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The
February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 23:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Every time I nominate article I point out the article needs third person sources inclusionists like DGG or Dream Focus will argue oh ignore the rules and that the fiction is sufficent evidence in of itself. I am not having another argument with someone who doesn't like evidence of rules pointed out to them. Observe yourself Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jitsu (Masters of the Universe), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock People Dwanyewest ( talk) 05:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
I have deleted the page per the result of the AfD to "get rid of the article" as you put it, and restored the redirect. I hope you don't mind. I understand the point to keep the page available for use, but anyone who wants to do so can ask for a userspace copy to be given to them. My reasoning for deleting the page is because, in the past, a couple of pages were merged into it, which now make very strange redirects, such as the animated series redirecting to "Control Alt Delete" the keyboard combination.
As we cannot delete such pages for attribution reasons whilst the content is still live on the site, I decided that deleting the old content that the AfD decided to delete was the best way to allow such redirects to be handled.
If you disagree, or if I botched it up (because there was alot of lag due to so many revisions being processed), please feel free to revert my actions. Sorry if I messed up, this started when I deleted a broken redirect, then followed a string of links to Ctrl+Alt+Del, the merge target, so I thought I would be bold and attempt to ensure the redirect issue was fully resolved.
Please ask if any of this makes no sense, thanks, -- Taelus ( talk) 15:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Voting for the
Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Congrats on your election as Coordinator for the Military history Project. In honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars. TomStar81 ( Talk) 00:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your support MisterBee1966 ( talk) 14:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your support on the coordinator elections. I look forward to working with you for the next term. – Joe N 14:03, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Comparison between Roman and Han Empires. Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 02:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC) (Using {{ Please see}})
You are invited to join the discussion at [ AFD] for Comparison between Roman and Han Empires, since you have participated in the last AFD. Gun Powder Ma ( talk) 23:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Comparison between Roman and Han Empires. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison between Roman and Han Empires (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:18, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Comparisons between Roman and Han Empires has been completely restructured per your and others' advice, with scholarly sources comparing the two only. Please take a look. Teeninvestor ( talk) 21:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
You mentioned in a message to Flint McRae ( talk · contribs · count) that you had merged the content of ISMTII to International Committee on Measurements and Instrumentation. Another editor, Tnxman307 ( talk · contribs · count), deleted International Committee on Measurements and Instrumentation. If you disagree with the deletion, you may want to discuss this with Tnxman307. - Eastmain ( talk) 03:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
The
November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 19:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I commented at AN/I just as you blocked this user. While you're unrequestionably within policy to do so, I'm not certain that this block is necessary at this time. I'll be blunt. Zensurfer is SPA who has been watching and editing the Robert Dickinson article which currently is up for deletion. Zensurfer, at minimum, appears to be close to the subject of that article. The article was vandalized, Zensurfer reverts claiming its on behalf of the subject, then the subject asks for deletion through OTRS. The vandal is blocked, and the AfD currently is unanimous for "delete". As the considerably less guilty party, I'm don't think a block at this time really de-escalates anything (especially if Zensurfer is, or really is close to, the subject of the article. I propose a refactoring the threat and an admonishment on the talk page. Still, as you are within policy, I'll respect your decision either way. Take care, Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 23:44, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I wish to contest the deletion of the article of 'Einy Shah'. I was told by someone called Kyle that there should be more links from ind newspapers or magazines. And, that it should be about the subject more. I done this. I posted support links and references from a London based newspaper of which Einy Shah & team were featured. A full BBC feature on their website. And a feature from a gossip magazine.
I do think Einy Shah is a noteable enough person and part of the reason creating the page was because of high demand. I've also created pages for 3 other journalists in the same group. There pages are fine, it's only this one causing any trouble.
Would approeciate it of you could advise me on how to retrieve this page.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.194.114 ( talk) 23:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
see here. and here. There are also earlier examples, but this one is over the edge. He has no respect for his fellow editors. Teeninvestor ( talk) 23:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
The second AFD of Comparison between Roman and Han Empires, resulted in the article being stubbified and the contents moved to Wikipedia:Article Incubator:Comparison between Roman and Han Empires. You are welcome to make suggestions at the article in the incubator. If your concerns are meet, and you believe the article is ready for mainspace, please sign here [1], or contact User:Spartaz, the closing admin. Thank you. Teeninvestor ( talk) 20:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Patar knight - please don't remove {{ uncatstub}} templates from articles only categorised as stubs, as you did here unless you are adding permanent categories to them! Articles need to be categorised in permanent categories, not just cleanup and stub categories, which is why {{ uncatstub}} exists. As the template says, "This article is uncategorized. Please help improve this article by adding it to one or more categories, in addition to a stub category." (my emphasis.) Grutness... wha? 23:55, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello, you blocked this user, citing a username policy breach. Please justify why this is a breach of the username policy. It certainly could be a standard username, "Freeman" is a common last name. The user has no contributions to act as evidence for bad faith, so could you please clarify why the user should remain indef blocked? Thank you, The Userboxer Complain/ ubx 03:34, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
The
December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 04:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
It's current, it's biography, it's military theme, what do you think about it: George Miok? I put a wikiProject Canada template onto the talp page of this article. I try to protect this article from the deletion. -- Eino81 ( talk) 01:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello Patar knight. You are receiving this notice because you have either supported or posted constructive suggestions during my recent self-nominated RFA, submitted on 18-01-2010. Please do spend a few minutes to read my comments on the nomination, and feel free to respond on the relevant talkpage for any further comments or questions. Thank you for participating. Regards. Rehman( +) 15:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
theres 6 denominations in islam
but only 4 are showing in the purple 'islam topics' template box at the bottom of the 'islam' page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafi
thats denomination 1 for Salafi's
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qur%27an_alone
thats denomination 2 for Quranists
could you try your best to add these two please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jigglyfidders ( talk • contribs) 05:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
The
January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 04:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your work on the 2010 Olympics opening ceremonies page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordandrei ( talk • contribs) 05:06, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your excellent efforts on the 2010 Winter Olympics opening ceremony page. Especially showing excellence in keeping to Wikipedia format under quick edits -- Lordandrei ( talk) 16:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC) |
I've been doing that all evening before you started editing the article and I've been trying to rework the Sochi part but can't since you keep editing. Therefore, I suggest that instead of simply removing the material you take the responsibility of rewriting it.
Rather than stepping in and telling someone else they're doing it wrong it's more productive and collegial to correct the problem and rewrite the material. That's always more polite and constructive than simply reverting and ordering a rewrite as if other editors work for you. I'm done. Rewrite the Sochi material yourself.
I'm sorry, I'm done and what you've left is woefully inadequate. I suggest you google some sources as news articles are up. In future rewrite instead of reverting. Doing ther former communicates a rather negative attitude as if you think other editors work for you. Also, in future look at the history. If you did that you would have seen that the unoriginal material was being rewritten and expanded as the live event unfolded. Instead you blundered in like a bull in a china shop who breaks things and expects others to clean up rather than chip in and help out.
I would sign my posts if my mobile's keyboard had a tilda key. My point stands, it's better to fix something then to tear it down and tell someone else to do it over. If you are going to criticize something than take the responsibility to complete the job rather than leaving it undone. You took on the responsibility now finish the job.
Since I'm on a mobile trying to write an article on a live event I couldn't use an external word processor or multiple browser screens. In the time you took to argue with me you could have rewritten the section. Anyway my thumbs are tired so I'm logging out now.
The
Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up
here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the
coordinator academy course and in the
responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The
February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 23:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Every time I nominate article I point out the article needs third person sources inclusionists like DGG or Dream Focus will argue oh ignore the rules and that the fiction is sufficent evidence in of itself. I am not having another argument with someone who doesn't like evidence of rules pointed out to them. Observe yourself Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jitsu (Masters of the Universe), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock People Dwanyewest ( talk) 05:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
I have deleted the page per the result of the AfD to "get rid of the article" as you put it, and restored the redirect. I hope you don't mind. I understand the point to keep the page available for use, but anyone who wants to do so can ask for a userspace copy to be given to them. My reasoning for deleting the page is because, in the past, a couple of pages were merged into it, which now make very strange redirects, such as the animated series redirecting to "Control Alt Delete" the keyboard combination.
As we cannot delete such pages for attribution reasons whilst the content is still live on the site, I decided that deleting the old content that the AfD decided to delete was the best way to allow such redirects to be handled.
If you disagree, or if I botched it up (because there was alot of lag due to so many revisions being processed), please feel free to revert my actions. Sorry if I messed up, this started when I deleted a broken redirect, then followed a string of links to Ctrl+Alt+Del, the merge target, so I thought I would be bold and attempt to ensure the redirect issue was fully resolved.
Please ask if any of this makes no sense, thanks, -- Taelus ( talk) 15:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Voting for the
Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 22:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Congrats on your election as Coordinator for the Military history Project. In honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars. TomStar81 ( Talk) 00:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your support MisterBee1966 ( talk) 14:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your support on the coordinator elections. I look forward to working with you for the next term. – Joe N 14:03, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |