U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited! | |
---|---|
Now in its fourth year,
Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (
STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at
Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:37, 5 October 2012 (UTC) |
You suggested the block on the List of members of the American Legislative Exchange Council. Blocking is fine. The problem is the sequence this article is frozen in, leaves the sanitized, whitewashed, one-sided POV version Arzel has been disruptively trying to have presented. As you already observed, the dissenting opinion was well documented with reliable sources. That's the wikipedia way. Arzel presents no sources, just his word; "no it isn't." I think my version properly deserves to be the state this article is frozen in. TruthtellernoBS ( talk) 02:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Drunkonjin". The reason given for Drunkonjin's block is: "Vandalism-only account".
Accept reason: Should be gone now. Max Semenik ( talk) 15:58, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited! | |
---|---|
Now in its fourth year,
Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (
STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at
Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:37, 5 October 2012 (UTC) |
You suggested the block on the List of members of the American Legislative Exchange Council. Blocking is fine. The problem is the sequence this article is frozen in, leaves the sanitized, whitewashed, one-sided POV version Arzel has been disruptively trying to have presented. As you already observed, the dissenting opinion was well documented with reliable sources. That's the wikipedia way. Arzel presents no sources, just his word; "no it isn't." I think my version properly deserves to be the state this article is frozen in. TruthtellernoBS ( talk) 02:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Drunkonjin". The reason given for Drunkonjin's block is: "Vandalism-only account".
Accept reason: Should be gone now. Max Semenik ( talk) 15:58, 25 October 2012 (UTC)