|
Hello PaperWario, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Arkady L. Bukh, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 19:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
@ Jackmcbarn:) From the research I have conducted, this article was likely written at the direction of the attorney.
There are 450,000 lawyers in the United States, and a small fraction of them have been involved in cases that warrant an entry in Wikipedia. This one certainly does not.
Articles are allowed to be improved during AfD. Please review deletion review policy at WP:AFDFORMAT (If you wish for an article to be kept, you can directly improve the article to address the reasons for deletion given in the nomination....). People can view earlier versions if they want but the point is to improve the article to see if it can be salvaged. Thank you. —Мандичка YO 😜 16:26, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, PaperWario. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Sendo.vn, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Brianhe ( talk) 22:47, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi there PaperWario. I'm a volunteer on conflict of interest related subjects and came across your contributions in relation to another editor. I have a simple question: are you paid for the things you write about on Wikipedia? If the answer is yes, it's not the end of the world, but there are some things you will have to do to continue editing here. You can just reply here, I'll be watching for an answer. Thanks. Brianhe ( talk) 15:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
The article Ledger (journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Randykitty (
talk)
09:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ledger (journal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ledger (journal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty ( talk) 07:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
You argued for merging Bitcoin XT into Bitcoin at Talk:Bitcoin XT. I was wondering whether you also had an opinion on the article Bitcoin Core. It has been nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin Core. -- Ysangkok ( talk) 01:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, PaperWario!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KylieTastic (
talk)
20:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello, PaperWario. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Binance Smart Chain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 01:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, PaperWario. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Binance Smart Chain".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello PaperWario, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Arkady L. Bukh, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Jackmcbarn ( talk) 19:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
@ Jackmcbarn:) From the research I have conducted, this article was likely written at the direction of the attorney.
There are 450,000 lawyers in the United States, and a small fraction of them have been involved in cases that warrant an entry in Wikipedia. This one certainly does not.
Articles are allowed to be improved during AfD. Please review deletion review policy at WP:AFDFORMAT (If you wish for an article to be kept, you can directly improve the article to address the reasons for deletion given in the nomination....). People can view earlier versions if they want but the point is to improve the article to see if it can be salvaged. Thank you. —Мандичка YO 😜 16:26, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, PaperWario. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Sendo.vn, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Brianhe ( talk) 22:47, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi there PaperWario. I'm a volunteer on conflict of interest related subjects and came across your contributions in relation to another editor. I have a simple question: are you paid for the things you write about on Wikipedia? If the answer is yes, it's not the end of the world, but there are some things you will have to do to continue editing here. You can just reply here, I'll be watching for an answer. Thanks. Brianhe ( talk) 15:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
The article Ledger (journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Randykitty (
talk)
09:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ledger (journal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ledger (journal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty ( talk) 07:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
You argued for merging Bitcoin XT into Bitcoin at Talk:Bitcoin XT. I was wondering whether you also had an opinion on the article Bitcoin Core. It has been nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin Core. -- Ysangkok ( talk) 01:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, PaperWario!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KylieTastic (
talk)
20:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello, PaperWario. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Binance Smart Chain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 01:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, PaperWario. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Binance Smart Chain".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)