|
Hi, I see you are back. Could you please have a look at the WikiProject Academic Journals Writing Guide and the guideline for notability for academic journals? It would save everybody a lot of time and effort if you could, for example, refrain from creating articles on non-notable journals and use the appropriate infobox (Journals, not Magazines) when creating articles on academic journals. Thanks. -- Crusio ( talk) 14:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Sorry Crusio, mine is only unexperience, I dont wanna make mistakes. I didn't have other accounts. Also, about the appropriate infobox, I thought you were working on it, I mean you were replacing the wrong template with the right model. If you want me to do it, please give me time. About notability, as you know your criteria are quite strict, but I am creating content for journals with an international distribution, and with a wide academic reference. thanks. Paoloxford ( talk) 14:23, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Do you work for this company? I notice you starting a lot of articles on journals from this company. I am not sure many of them are notable and may send them to our deletion process shortly. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 09:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
I think you should forgive me if I wrote contributions with mistakes, im just learning how to use wikipedia but im trying to respect all the rules.
Hi, you (and an anonymous IP, I guess you forgot to login) have been adding Scopus to the indexing services of several journals of your company. However, Scopus is not listed on the journals' homepages. What is your source for this addition? -- Crusio ( talk) 09:52, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
See the journals homepage. They are updated now. Paoloxford ( talk) 12:00, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Historical Reflections has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs)
15:56, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Social Analysis (journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs)
12:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with
this edit to
Talk:Nature and Culture (journal), as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or
reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see
further information. Thank you.
A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (
talk)
15:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Please read the guide for creating journal articles. Please review the corrections that I have made to your articles and avoid making the same errors over and over again (e.g., linking to journal, which is a disambiguation page, or indicating for each and every journal that it's discipline is " area studies", even if it clearly isn't). Please do not copy material directly from the journals' homepages. To see why this is important, have a look at the talkpage of KeepM. Despite my protestations, all articles created by that editor were speedily deleted (and the editor blocked). Your articles are not any better than KeepM's, so you should realize that I'm not here to harass you but to make sure that as many notable journals as possible are covered in WP in a neutral, encyclopedic manner. Continue as you have been doing up till now and you'll run the risk to be treated like KeepM if some editor who's less patient or tolerant happens by here. -- Crusio ( talk) 15:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Crusio, thanks for the message. I tried to create and/or modify some of the articles following your instructions,and I saw that some of them seem to be accepted..I just added another articles today and I am sorry if I made some mistakes.. Paoloxford ( talk) 15:19, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Ok, I just wanted to say that the 'notability' and 'neutrality' issue seem to have desappeared on some contributions, e.g. several journals pages. Regarding this, would it be possible to have a reply in this talk page? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Berghahn_Books Thanks! Paoloxford ( talk) 12:38, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Nature and Culture (journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 23:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Jackmcbarn (
talk)
23:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
|
Hi, I see you are back. Could you please have a look at the WikiProject Academic Journals Writing Guide and the guideline for notability for academic journals? It would save everybody a lot of time and effort if you could, for example, refrain from creating articles on non-notable journals and use the appropriate infobox (Journals, not Magazines) when creating articles on academic journals. Thanks. -- Crusio ( talk) 14:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Sorry Crusio, mine is only unexperience, I dont wanna make mistakes. I didn't have other accounts. Also, about the appropriate infobox, I thought you were working on it, I mean you were replacing the wrong template with the right model. If you want me to do it, please give me time. About notability, as you know your criteria are quite strict, but I am creating content for journals with an international distribution, and with a wide academic reference. thanks. Paoloxford ( talk) 14:23, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Do you work for this company? I notice you starting a lot of articles on journals from this company. I am not sure many of them are notable and may send them to our deletion process shortly. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 09:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
I think you should forgive me if I wrote contributions with mistakes, im just learning how to use wikipedia but im trying to respect all the rules.
Hi, you (and an anonymous IP, I guess you forgot to login) have been adding Scopus to the indexing services of several journals of your company. However, Scopus is not listed on the journals' homepages. What is your source for this addition? -- Crusio ( talk) 09:52, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
See the journals homepage. They are updated now. Paoloxford ( talk) 12:00, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Historical Reflections has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs)
15:56, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Social Analysis (journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs)
12:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with
this edit to
Talk:Nature and Culture (journal), as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or
reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see
further information. Thank you.
A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (
talk)
15:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Please read the guide for creating journal articles. Please review the corrections that I have made to your articles and avoid making the same errors over and over again (e.g., linking to journal, which is a disambiguation page, or indicating for each and every journal that it's discipline is " area studies", even if it clearly isn't). Please do not copy material directly from the journals' homepages. To see why this is important, have a look at the talkpage of KeepM. Despite my protestations, all articles created by that editor were speedily deleted (and the editor blocked). Your articles are not any better than KeepM's, so you should realize that I'm not here to harass you but to make sure that as many notable journals as possible are covered in WP in a neutral, encyclopedic manner. Continue as you have been doing up till now and you'll run the risk to be treated like KeepM if some editor who's less patient or tolerant happens by here. -- Crusio ( talk) 15:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Crusio, thanks for the message. I tried to create and/or modify some of the articles following your instructions,and I saw that some of them seem to be accepted..I just added another articles today and I am sorry if I made some mistakes.. Paoloxford ( talk) 15:19, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Ok, I just wanted to say that the 'notability' and 'neutrality' issue seem to have desappeared on some contributions, e.g. several journals pages. Regarding this, would it be possible to have a reply in this talk page? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Berghahn_Books Thanks! Paoloxford ( talk) 12:38, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
The article Nature and Culture (journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jackmcbarn (
talk) 23:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Jackmcbarn (
talk)
23:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)