Please stop your
disruptive editing, as you did at
Greenfields School. Your edits have been
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You keep inserting more positive news about this school. Obviously, your co-authors disagree, and have told you repeatedly. So refrain from coming back to these points, or you risk to be blocked. Super48paul ( talk) 08:20, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Mean as custard (
talk)
18:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Greenfields School. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian ( talk) 18:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
22:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
A fluffernutter is a sandwich! ( talk) 18:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing, as you did at
Greenfields School. Your edits have been
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You keep inserting more positive news about this school. Obviously, your co-authors disagree, and have told you repeatedly. So refrain from coming back to these points, or you risk to be blocked. Super48paul ( talk) 08:20, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Mean as custard (
talk)
18:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Greenfields School. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian ( talk) 18:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
22:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
A fluffernutter is a sandwich! ( talk) 18:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)