Greetings P@ddington, I see you're up for adoption, and I'm in the market. If ever you need advice or answers, just ask me -- any question, any time. I'd like to help however I can. Since I see you haven't been formally welcomed to Wikipedia, I'll place a welcome banner below. Happy editing - Draeco ( talk) 05:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
As for your userbox questions:
Draeco ( talk) 02:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
|
Hello, P@ddington. I saw that you added a bit on the FedEx article about the Brown Bailout. I've just started working on a section for that article about it. Any interest in helping out? You can find it on my subpage here. And from one new user to another, welcome!-- Alang814 ( talk) 07:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Great! It's easy to see that things get done a lot faster and better with a second set of eyes, no wonder the word collaboration is all over all the getting started pages on here. I think it's not there for the same reason we aren't posting our article as a section on the FedEx page, it just worked better as a standalone. Yeah that sounds like a good idea. It could easily be linked back and forth from an article on corruption. And I have noticed that it's almost exclusively a republican buzzword, although I think it would be smart to be fair on this one. Love that movie! I played guitar in a small-time band and we did an amazing cover of Scotty Doesn't Know. #So are you alright with me deleting the subpage after we move the article to the main namespace? Finally, Is my page on your watchlist? Just want to know so I don't keep copying and pasting responses. --Alang814 (talk) 06:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alang814 ( talk • contribs)
Hey,
Bedtime!
P@ddington ( talk) 06:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Okay,
Great working with you. -- Alang814 ( talk) 06:39, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I've posted the article and I'm about to link the articles for FedEx, UPS, the Teamsters' union, and probably an article on the term bailout, or the bailouts of the financial sector from last year or the one before --mentioning FedEx's misuse of the term. Have a look at the article,
here. After that I'm going to delete the content of my subpage and put it up for deletion. Great work!--
Alang814 (
talk)
18:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Done, I linked UPS, FedEx, Bailout, and Teamsters to the Brown Bailout page. Now to delete the subpage. By the way, the talk page we had on there will be gone too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alang814 ( talk • contribs) 19:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Dude. You watch the Daily Show too! good stuff, man-- Alang814 ( talk) 02:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Well, yeah, the Glenn Beck thing was awesome. Not too sure about the O'Reilly interview, for several reasons. 1st of all, the first few minutes on Obama are pretty weak--Stewart could be a better (but should he? I'd rather see him be no more than an entertainer). 2nd, it seems like they both enjoy how important they are, and it's kind of awkward for the viewer (who either loves Stewart and hates O'Reilly or vice-versa). P@ddington ( talk) 06:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an
edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –
BMRR (
talk)
17:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Duly noted!
P@ddington (
talk)
01:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello again: please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Adding content to an article is not considered a minor edit. Thanks and Happy Editing, – BMRR ( talk) 17:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Duly noted #2 P@ddington ( talk) 01:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey there. I've finally started that subsection on the criticism of WP. It's not much, but it's late and I'm far too tired to do any extensive writing tonight. Especially when it's all the tedium that comes with doing summaries. Anyway, feel free to take a look and help out on it. I've posted one or two issues I had at the top of the page and in its section in the talk page. You can find all of it here. Thanks!-- Alang814 ( talk) 05:48, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand your question about skipping lines. You could try posting your question on Wikipedia:Help desk, or using the {{helpme}} tag on your user talk page. -- Gordon Ecker ( talk) 06:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
P@ddington ( talk) 02:59, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
this sentence has one return.
Greetings P@ddington, I see you're up for adoption, and I'm in the market. If ever you need advice or answers, just ask me -- any question, any time. I'd like to help however I can. Since I see you haven't been formally welcomed to Wikipedia, I'll place a welcome banner below. Happy editing - Draeco ( talk) 05:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
As for your userbox questions:
Draeco ( talk) 02:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
|
Hello, P@ddington. I saw that you added a bit on the FedEx article about the Brown Bailout. I've just started working on a section for that article about it. Any interest in helping out? You can find it on my subpage here. And from one new user to another, welcome!-- Alang814 ( talk) 07:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Great! It's easy to see that things get done a lot faster and better with a second set of eyes, no wonder the word collaboration is all over all the getting started pages on here. I think it's not there for the same reason we aren't posting our article as a section on the FedEx page, it just worked better as a standalone. Yeah that sounds like a good idea. It could easily be linked back and forth from an article on corruption. And I have noticed that it's almost exclusively a republican buzzword, although I think it would be smart to be fair on this one. Love that movie! I played guitar in a small-time band and we did an amazing cover of Scotty Doesn't Know. #So are you alright with me deleting the subpage after we move the article to the main namespace? Finally, Is my page on your watchlist? Just want to know so I don't keep copying and pasting responses. --Alang814 (talk) 06:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alang814 ( talk • contribs)
Hey,
Bedtime!
P@ddington ( talk) 06:29, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Okay,
Great working with you. -- Alang814 ( talk) 06:39, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I've posted the article and I'm about to link the articles for FedEx, UPS, the Teamsters' union, and probably an article on the term bailout, or the bailouts of the financial sector from last year or the one before --mentioning FedEx's misuse of the term. Have a look at the article,
here. After that I'm going to delete the content of my subpage and put it up for deletion. Great work!--
Alang814 (
talk)
18:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Done, I linked UPS, FedEx, Bailout, and Teamsters to the Brown Bailout page. Now to delete the subpage. By the way, the talk page we had on there will be gone too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alang814 ( talk • contribs) 19:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Dude. You watch the Daily Show too! good stuff, man-- Alang814 ( talk) 02:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Well, yeah, the Glenn Beck thing was awesome. Not too sure about the O'Reilly interview, for several reasons. 1st of all, the first few minutes on Obama are pretty weak--Stewart could be a better (but should he? I'd rather see him be no more than an entertainer). 2nd, it seems like they both enjoy how important they are, and it's kind of awkward for the viewer (who either loves Stewart and hates O'Reilly or vice-versa). P@ddington ( talk) 06:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an
edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. –
BMRR (
talk)
17:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Duly noted!
P@ddington (
talk)
01:18, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello again: please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Adding content to an article is not considered a minor edit. Thanks and Happy Editing, – BMRR ( talk) 17:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Duly noted #2 P@ddington ( talk) 01:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey there. I've finally started that subsection on the criticism of WP. It's not much, but it's late and I'm far too tired to do any extensive writing tonight. Especially when it's all the tedium that comes with doing summaries. Anyway, feel free to take a look and help out on it. I've posted one or two issues I had at the top of the page and in its section in the talk page. You can find all of it here. Thanks!-- Alang814 ( talk) 05:48, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand your question about skipping lines. You could try posting your question on Wikipedia:Help desk, or using the {{helpme}} tag on your user talk page. -- Gordon Ecker ( talk) 06:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
P@ddington ( talk) 02:59, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
this sentence has one return.