![]() Contrib |
![]() Talk |
![]() Awards |
![]() |
![]() Count |
| ||||
If you want to contact me, please
leave a message.
As I would like to keep conversations together, I'll reply on my talk page if you left me a message. If I start a conversation on your talk page, I'm watching it, so you can respond there. |
(In elgish, cause well i suck and only speak one language) HAPPY NEW YEARS! hope it was a safe good one, Tiptoety talk 08:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
I didn't realise you weren't supposed to merge histories when the same author performed the cut-paste move. I assumed (it doesn't really specify on WP:HISTMERGE) that all cut-paste moves were supposed to be merged regardless. -- Closedmouth ( talk) 13:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I ask a simple question about why semi protection is being abused on this article, and the first reaction is for an admin to block my IP, instead of undoing the manifestly out of process protection. How about allowing anyone to edit? (copied to ANI) 122.145.6.138 ( talk) 16:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Season Greetings
The bio we put up for John Basedow is something from our website, which we own the copyright for. Please don't make the mistaken assumption that we put up copyrighted information without permission. We did not appreciate your "warning" and would prefer if you simply ask us about things you're unsure of rather than writing threatening notes. We were trying to help you make John's listing more factually accurate.
Kind Regards, Pat Riches FMS Operations —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laddypat ( talk • contribs) 09:04, 3 Jan 2008
You my friend have no sense of humor whatsoever. I do not like you that much. Please leave me alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ubergeek92 ( talk • contribs) 14:47, 3 Jan 2008
Hi Oxymoron83. The last three days I am tagging redirects found here that have the same common thing. They all have quotes and redirect to the same article without the quotes or a redirection without the quotes exists. Almost all of them are orphan. Since you are an admin and you have better tools than mine, maybe you could help me delete many cases of these? At least the very obvious ones? Btw, you acted very good by renaming one redirect I have tagged for deletion. Viele Danke. :) -- Magioladitis ( talk) 15:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Many thanks for your good work on 31 December to my user page, which seems to have become a playground for retards when I wasn't looking. I've only today noticed the changes, with witless IPs adding crap and a couple of good people (who should have spent their time partying or similar) clearing it up. -- Hoary ( talk) 07:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Alright, I have no clue why this persistent spammer who has operated over for over a year and a half is only getting a 1 year block. This guy will not stop, I know he won't. There are single purpose vandalism accounts that get indef blocked for less, I don't understand why a single purpose spammer doesn't. Please reconsider the length of your block. Satu rday Contribs 00:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about the readd (was working on reverting and reporting at the same time). Thanks! :) Take Care.... NeutralHomer T: C 01:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the time & effort spent doing the histmerges on those XE radio station articles. Aille ( talk) 02:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
dear oxymoron83, the page ADEPD was deleted by you as logged:
because of beeing a web page copy. I have placed the related web page (and the whole site) now under a GNU FDL license as recomended by admins on User_talk:Hgrobe. May I ask you to reactivate the ADEPD page. Thank you and best wishes Hannes Grobe ( talk) 08:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Doczilla ( talk) 14:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello there
I see you are interested in the Life On Mars Television Series, as I am.
At the moment I have A Life On Mars Wikiproject currently up for approval by the Wikiproject Approval Council. As you are interested in Life On Mars I was wondering if you would be interested in adding your name and joining. If you are interested you can find it on Wikipedia: WikiProject Council/Proposals its right at the very bottom you cant miss it as its titled ‘Wikipedia: Wikiproject Life on Mars (Television Series)’. And after your name is added to Wikiproject propsals please add it to the main page Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars
If you are interested by all means feel free to join
Regards
Please do not block me again. This is an ongoing issue with Blotto adrift and he was been blocked by others several times. Please read his history. The Trenton Ontario page is correct and he keeps changing it. In the future please look into both sides thank you.
PS I recommend that you block Blotto adrift if he changes the Trenton Ontario page again.
ps I am trying to make wikipedia better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.50.5 ( talk • contribs)
FYI This person has been adding porn links again this morning. You may want to warn/block them. Mannafredo ( talk) 10:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Examples: Odysseus, Trojan Horse, Persian Empire, History and CMDB. Mannafredo ( talk) 10:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
I got a message from you saying you changed something I edited. I don't remember editing anything on the Worm article. Is there any way I can see what changes were made?
Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.96.201 ( talk • contribs) 10:26, 7 Jan 2008
Appreciate your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GTi16V ( talk • contribs) 16:30, 7 Jan 2008
URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nilanjan_Mukhopadhyay is being repeatedly vandalised. You have removed an instance of vandalism. Could you suggest ways to stop this completely.
Regards,
Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.134.110 ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 7 Jan 2008
The user didn't vandalize Bongwarrior's article. It merely greeted someone it considered to be a "Wikipedophile". It probably didn't even know where to go to properly do that. Blocking the user was unnecessary. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 21:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
That's just the thing. The last one it did wasn't vandalism. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 21:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
That just flashed before my eyes the same way a bunch of clips from sixties' programs would. When you blocked him (the user) how did you "steal" it from Bongy-boy? Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 22:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Several people have been trying to talk me into going up for adminship. If I do, I'd like to have objective guidelines for determining the duration of a vandal's block. Having been impressed by your work, I'd like to ask how you pick durations. Thanks. Doczilla ( talk) 22:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page! Chetblong Talk Sign 01:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
70.228.252.94 has vandalized nitrogen as soon as your 48 hour block expired. I suggest perhaps a week, this time? Double length of block each time, until somebody at the other end (the IP admin for the school, probably) has their attention drawn to the problem. Can't be fixed except at the other end. S B H arris 20:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I've been working on List of cryptids and I'm going through the list's redlinks removing the ones which have been deleted due to notability issues, speedied, simply don't exist or ones which will never be created into a good article. I checked the Beast of Durham's deletion log and noticed you deleted it due to CSD#G1 and was wondering if you could say if it really was just drivel or if there is any potential to make a workable article? I checked google (-wikipedia) and it came up with only a few links; most of which were from crypto-nut pages and one from the BBC (Although it was only comprised of reader's sent-in accounts of various big cat sightings). Now I know absence of information doesn't equal information of absense, but do you think I should try and create the article, or will it not meet notability guidelines as I suspect? I can either create an article out of the info on the net, or I can simply remove the link from the list. I had the same problem with Flying humanoids which was deleted due to notability issues, but since I can't see the deleted content, I won't know if it was a poorly referenced page, or just nn full stop even with references. Anyway, I won't hold you up any longer, but I thought since you're an admin, you might have some insight. Cheers, Spawn Man ( talk) 23:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I've created Giant anaconda - was that the sort of thing you were thinking of (IE, do you think it'll be deleted?)? Cheers, Spawn Man ( talk) 00:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Why do you bother wasting your time with this site? 194.189.32.65 ( talk) 12:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Please don't cut&paste content from articles into another. The attribution of the original authors is an important part of the GFDL, you aren't the author of the content. Mentioning at least the 5 main authors of the content is required, and state where it was copied from (both in the edit summary). Best you include the edit history since this edit, e. g. at the talk page. Regards -- Oxymoron 83 23:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Ok, fine, apparently I don't know to do that from a technical standpoint. Would you move the soundtrack portion to its own webpage, as most soundtracks have their own page instead of eing merged into the article. Berenlazarus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Berenlazarus ( talk • contribs) 23:52, 10 Jan 2008
Very nice. Thank you. Doczilla ( talk) 01:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Please help clear the massive backlogs at AIV and RFPP Alex fusco 5 02:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
You’ve been awarded this barnstar. Partially because it spreads wikilove, but mostly because I’ve seen you around vandal fighting and I think you’ve done a good job. Kannie | talk 04:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
Thank you very much for protecting Automobile and so soon after I requested it. You've made a lot of people very happy I'm sure. Dino246 ( talk) 19:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
You do know that he didn't vandalise after the final warning you gave him? ClueBot beat you to the rv but you beat him to the warning, so he reported to aiv. I'm not questioning you block just thought you'd be interested to know -- Chris 00:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on the food chemistry article. I really appreciate it. Chris ( talk) 01:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my talk page I guess with my userpage protected they have to vandalize somewhere ;)
Alex
fusco
5
17:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
http://sev.prnewswire.com/publishing-information-services/20080111/DC1129510012008-1.html add this to PETA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.92.214.203 ( talk • contribs) 22:04, 12 Jan 2008
Yeah, I did. Thanks. I'm an idiot when it comes to this sort of thing. Thanks for your help. -- Bookworm857158367 ( talk) 23:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes, please go ahead and move the page/history/etc. and fix whatever I screwed up. I appreciate your help. -- Bookworm857158367 ( talk) 01:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I just created an article on Quincy (Ohio) in German, and used the infobox that includes a locator map. The coördinates are right, according to the US Census data, but the map shows it in the wrong place ( here is a proper illustration), and I don't know what to do. Do you know how to work with these maps? Nyttend ( talk) 19:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my talk page - before I even knew it was there. :) -- Ed ( Edgar181) 21:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my talk page. I've been dealing with that anonymous editor for the past week or so. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 23:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
What a relief to the editors (usually not me!) who work on Crusades to have it so promptly semi-protected for several months. This will be an immense help to continue improving the article instead of having to defend themselves against vandalism. Student7 ( talk) 01:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Do you know anything about Oxymoron2008 ( talk · contribs)? Is that you? Seems to be making good high-speed vandalism reverts much like you do so I'm confused. It's currently at WP:UAA. — Wknight94 ( talk) 15:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm very sorry for all my disruptive edits it was very silly of me and shouldn't be done agen, sorry
I LOVE BDSM —Preceding unsigned comment added by Purplepoo44 ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 14 Jan 2008
Many thanks for dealing with it. — alex.muller ( talk • edits) 00:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
After receiving a note regarding an article I had unintentionally posted (I am new to this and did not realize I had "saved" - horrors!) I deleted it myself. Evidently you and I deleted at the same moment, and so I am writing to you for help.
My question for you is - now that an article of that name has been deleted, will I be able to contribute a new one of the same name?
Thank you so much for your help!
Eileen
User:Kaomso has not responded for over a week to any of the objections to his proposal that is inconsistent with what a neutral party and I have agreed with. Is it appropriate to consider it an abandonment of the argument? Butterfly0fdoom ( talk) 04:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping the vandalism off my user page! I haven't been on wikipedia for a while, so i didn't see it. Those jerks are so annoying! Thanks again. -- Turbokoala ( talk) 20:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
hmm excuse me but YOU *very wrongly* made a change back to what i had corrected.
for your info, russian names stay the same also after they'd been translated into english. seriously it's not called "vandalizing" BTW. the correction i made on "tsar niCHolaS II" was rightful since it should be called "tsar niKolaI II". not trying to be rude but please don't wrongly fix thing you don't know about. thank you.
P.S = it would be nice if you changed the names over on the wikipedia page "tsar niCHolaS II" since it's locked for other users.
sincerely, L+L —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liao446 ( talk • contribs) 00:17, 17 Jan 2008
I and put it right back! switched a few things. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnnathan ( talk • contribs) 00:28, 17 Jan 2008
Wow! 35 seconds for reverting that page! That was extremely quick! Wikipedia never fails to impress me! 69.37.38.50 ( talk) 01:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. You're very fast. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 02:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
why did you revert my edit?
i see why you did it. i edited the wrong version, sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.49.240.91 ( talk • contribs) 02:51, 17 Jan 2008
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. I always love it that people who spend their time messing things up tell us that we're the ones with no life. Have a great day. -Mastrchf91- 03:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
blocked? for editing what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.121.4.220 ( talk)
Thanks for that. I reported the bot because it kept removing the IPs which were blocked indefinitely by a now-inactive admin, who hasn't participated for quite a while (I think 2006 was his last contributions).
I'll try and avoid that next time, though. Thanks for the tip. I guess I learn from my mistakes here... this is one more to avoid!
Thanks, -- Solumeiras talk 13:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I wish to nominated the article Orion (constellation) to be semi-protected because of the extreme number of anonymous vandals editing that article. Considering it's a high profile article, an article children would be likely to look up, the detrimental effects of the vandalism to how Wikipedia looks as a whole, and the proportion that most edits are vandalism and reversions, I think semi-protection against anonymous users would be appropriate. Since the process requires a consensus on the article's talk page and you are one of the registered users who have reverted vandalism recently, I am writing in the hopes that you will go to the talk page and agree to the semi-protection. If we can get a convincing consensus, we can continue the process to the next step. Thanks for your time. -- Bark ( talk) 15:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Me and another user are having trouble with another editor over at the Johnnie Ray page. Basically, that editor is rolling back changes over several edits and removing maintenance tags for no real reason. We've had some issues with this same editor in the past so any attempts to compromise are pretty much out the window. Could you possibly step in and help as they've already resorted to name calling. Thanks! Pinkadelica ( talk) 18:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Qwertyqwert123 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (blocked indef), may be the same vandal as Niquefreak94 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) per this article Mike Jones (Rapper)-- Hu12 ( talk) 19:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
How do you delete a category? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2L84UBB ( talk • contribs) 05:12, 19 Jan 2008
How can I use Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.82.146.105 ( talk • contribs) 06:21, 19 Jan 2008
Hello, Oxymoron83. I think it is time to unprotect this article. Would it be reasonable for me to apply for unprotection? Screen stalker ( talk) 16:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Tariqabjotu, I've protected Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus some time ago to allow an undisturbed discussion at the case you mediate. The mediation and consensus building has made good progress but without a final conclusion. User:Screen stalker asked me to unprotect the page, but I don't want to do it prematurely what could worsen the situation. Do you think an unprotection should be tried now or is it better to wait some more days? -- Oxymoron 83 18:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello! Whilst browsing Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Requests I found this game had been requested and located some sources to interest a potential creator. After clicking on the link I found that it previously existed but the author requested deletion which you obliged. Does that mean that version is out-of-bounds or could it be brought back and sourced? Got the feeling deletion was requested because it was prodded or some discussion took place about notability. Here are the additional sources: [11] [12] [13]. Thanks. Someone another 17:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
...thank you for the revert. Was just scratching my head over whether I could do a 3RR violation report or not on Snark, so didn't notice it until I saw your warning on their talk page. Thanks again! Giles Bennett ( Talk, Contribs) 21:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
For the quick revert of my user page, humble though it may be. It's nice to know that we've got people watching our backs :) Xymmax ( talk) 21:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
:-) Sorry about that, I couldn't resist —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.162.122 ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 20 Jan 2008
After much thought and deliberation I have decided to return. Many wikians contacted me by various means and I truly appreciate the support from all of them. Man, did I need that wiki break! I have learned from it and will use the experience to improve. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that vandalization of my user page -- it's appreciated. Why is it the "YouTube celebrities" who get their noses so far out of joint when you suggest they don't have any notability? Accounting4Taste: talk 17:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Is protection necessary? Just curious what prompted that? Thanks, -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 18:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
FYI, the user who vandalized your page a couple of days ago under the names of "Kjgbnfjg", "Handsfudn nn5", "Nadjht45", "Abovelabel33", and "Efgnj" has turned out to be Primetime ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I don't know how you came to his attention. The latest socks are listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Primetime. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi I thought I would tell you about huggle, a new anti vandal tool that is very fast and helpful Alex fusco 5 00:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop blocking peoples accounts for faulse causes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aj00200 ( talk • contribs) -moved from user page by Onorem♠ Dil 16:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Is there a place where we can read the changes that this IP made? It is a public PC and we would hate to be banned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.230.191.51 ( talk • contribs) 01:22, 25 Jan 2008
Hi. You probably have notice alreasy, but the guy who is on a vandalism spree on Illinois-related articles, such as DuPage County, Illinois, seems to have some sleeper accounts created early in January. FlowerpotmaN·( t) 03:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Oxymoron83,
I saw something someone said a while ago on ANI: “...a block notice wasn't even left, leaving the user with no way to even know how to request an unblock...”. I’m pretty sure that’s not right, but it reminded me of something I’ve wondered about (for this very reason) for a while: what it’s actually like to be blocked. Especially, what information is given for how to get out of it.
I hope you don’t think of this as a frivolous request (it isn’t, I promise), but would you mind blocking my ( completely legit!) alternate account, User:Barneca sock 1 for say 15 minutes? With autoblock enabled, so I can see both the block screen for the blocked user, and the autoblock screen from User:Barneca too. I’m quite confident no one else is using this IP (it’s static). I won’t waste anyone’s time with an unblock request; I’ll wait for the 15 minutes to be up. The only possible hassle to other people I see is the possibility that the autoblock could malfunction, and not be lifted after the 15 minutes, and then I’ll have to pester someone with an un-autoblock request.
Scientizzle mistakenly (but in good faith!) blocked that account when I first created it, but I kind of knew what to do already, and was so busy getting the autoblock lifted, I didn’t take the time to pay attention to the specifics of what information was provided to the blocked editor. I know I could look at the mediawiki templates somewhere (I’ve done that before), but it isn’t the same. All the variables are empty, and it’s a jumble of brackets and really hard to see and understand what the blocked editor would actually see.
If this is ok with you, then thanks for the trouble, I'm ready when you are. If not, sorry for the bother. -- barneca ( talk) 22:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for that... I'm not sure we lost a lot on that one... -- Jayron32. talk. contribs 19:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi i'm new to wikipedia and i need some direction on creating new articles i'm a little confused please contact me back.......>>>>> user:jadawg19 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadawg19 ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 25 Jan 2008
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I award you this Barnstar, Oxymoron83 for reverting vandalism on my user page. Keep up the good work! -- The Helpful One (Talk) (Contribs) (Review) 19:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC) |
Sorry for "vandalizing". I obviously didn't know what the word meant. Thought I was just asking a question. I'll stop now. Please don't block me.
P.S.- Is the First Amendment valid in the Sandbox? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.214.200.200 ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 25 Jan 2008
Comment on content. OK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.214.200.200 ( talk • contribs) 20:10, 25 Jan 2008
Can I really be blocked without an account? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.214.200.200 ( talk • contribs) 20:12, 25 Jan 2008
Can I clear my record on Wikipedia? Can I get rid of the warnings?
-- 65.214.200.200 ( talk) 20:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
As I just noted on THO's page -- it was a copyvio [16] Sam Korn (smoddy) 20:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Oxymoron83, I was wondering: isn't an 8 hour block for that disruptive of an edit (an he's done other vandalisms too) a bit minor? I think Wikipedia needs to crack down on these vandals - I like undoing them, but I'm starting to get frustrated at so many. I know wikipedia has this open editing policy, and even still people can get an account and still vandalize. But it should only be a place for constructive editors to... well, edit. ~ GoldenGoose100 ( talk) 06:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
|
Thanks! | |
Oxymoron83/Archive 5, thank you for showing your support in
my RFA which passed with 38 support, 0 oppose, and 0 neutral! I also want to give special thanks to my Admin Coach and nominator,
Useight for all of his help and support. I promise that I'll give my best effort as an admin, and I hope that your confidence in me proves to be justified. If I can ever be of any help, please let me know. In the mean time, I have some
cleaning to do. Have a great day! Jauerback dude?/ dude. 20:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
Hello , How are you i woluld be pleased if you help me build my wiki page on Federation of Nigeria Youth Greens. Here from you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Federation of Nigeria Youth Greens ( talk • contribs) 02:23, 31 Jan 2008
You once said that you worked with regexes to detect vandalism on VF... how would I use them too? Is there a list already made to import all the words that need to be detected? -- Menti fisto 11:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I would guess that this user, created today, is not you. Can you confirm this? Robert Ullmann ( talk) 15:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Some vandals are just more annoying than others. Thanks for blocking that "Powderbun" character. It never stops around here, does it? In any event, thanks for wielding the mop and bucket. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 16:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
PMDrive1061 (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi Gurch, you reverted 64.90.240.114 ( talk · contribs) at Jane Addams, but Huggle didn't place a warning. Was this because VoABot reported already to AIV after the level3 warning? -- Oxymoron 83 16:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Eh, wasn't really sure myself. I'd blocked a possible TougHHead just a couple of minutes before, and I'm not really popular with the vandals so I figured he'd come back to exact a little revenge. :-D east.718 at 23:03, January 31, 2008
![]() Contrib |
![]() Talk |
![]() Awards |
![]() |
![]() Count |
| ||||
If you want to contact me, please
leave a message.
As I would like to keep conversations together, I'll reply on my talk page if you left me a message. If I start a conversation on your talk page, I'm watching it, so you can respond there. |
(In elgish, cause well i suck and only speak one language) HAPPY NEW YEARS! hope it was a safe good one, Tiptoety talk 08:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
I didn't realise you weren't supposed to merge histories when the same author performed the cut-paste move. I assumed (it doesn't really specify on WP:HISTMERGE) that all cut-paste moves were supposed to be merged regardless. -- Closedmouth ( talk) 13:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I ask a simple question about why semi protection is being abused on this article, and the first reaction is for an admin to block my IP, instead of undoing the manifestly out of process protection. How about allowing anyone to edit? (copied to ANI) 122.145.6.138 ( talk) 16:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Season Greetings
The bio we put up for John Basedow is something from our website, which we own the copyright for. Please don't make the mistaken assumption that we put up copyrighted information without permission. We did not appreciate your "warning" and would prefer if you simply ask us about things you're unsure of rather than writing threatening notes. We were trying to help you make John's listing more factually accurate.
Kind Regards, Pat Riches FMS Operations —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laddypat ( talk • contribs) 09:04, 3 Jan 2008
You my friend have no sense of humor whatsoever. I do not like you that much. Please leave me alone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ubergeek92 ( talk • contribs) 14:47, 3 Jan 2008
Hi Oxymoron83. The last three days I am tagging redirects found here that have the same common thing. They all have quotes and redirect to the same article without the quotes or a redirection without the quotes exists. Almost all of them are orphan. Since you are an admin and you have better tools than mine, maybe you could help me delete many cases of these? At least the very obvious ones? Btw, you acted very good by renaming one redirect I have tagged for deletion. Viele Danke. :) -- Magioladitis ( talk) 15:06, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Many thanks for your good work on 31 December to my user page, which seems to have become a playground for retards when I wasn't looking. I've only today noticed the changes, with witless IPs adding crap and a couple of good people (who should have spent their time partying or similar) clearing it up. -- Hoary ( talk) 07:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Alright, I have no clue why this persistent spammer who has operated over for over a year and a half is only getting a 1 year block. This guy will not stop, I know he won't. There are single purpose vandalism accounts that get indef blocked for less, I don't understand why a single purpose spammer doesn't. Please reconsider the length of your block. Satu rday Contribs 00:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry about the readd (was working on reverting and reporting at the same time). Thanks! :) Take Care.... NeutralHomer T: C 01:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the time & effort spent doing the histmerges on those XE radio station articles. Aille ( talk) 02:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
dear oxymoron83, the page ADEPD was deleted by you as logged:
because of beeing a web page copy. I have placed the related web page (and the whole site) now under a GNU FDL license as recomended by admins on User_talk:Hgrobe. May I ask you to reactivate the ADEPD page. Thank you and best wishes Hannes Grobe ( talk) 08:57, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Doczilla ( talk) 14:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello there
I see you are interested in the Life On Mars Television Series, as I am.
At the moment I have A Life On Mars Wikiproject currently up for approval by the Wikiproject Approval Council. As you are interested in Life On Mars I was wondering if you would be interested in adding your name and joining. If you are interested you can find it on Wikipedia: WikiProject Council/Proposals its right at the very bottom you cant miss it as its titled ‘Wikipedia: Wikiproject Life on Mars (Television Series)’. And after your name is added to Wikiproject propsals please add it to the main page Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars
If you are interested by all means feel free to join
Regards
Please do not block me again. This is an ongoing issue with Blotto adrift and he was been blocked by others several times. Please read his history. The Trenton Ontario page is correct and he keeps changing it. In the future please look into both sides thank you.
PS I recommend that you block Blotto adrift if he changes the Trenton Ontario page again.
ps I am trying to make wikipedia better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.50.5 ( talk • contribs)
FYI This person has been adding porn links again this morning. You may want to warn/block them. Mannafredo ( talk) 10:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Examples: Odysseus, Trojan Horse, Persian Empire, History and CMDB. Mannafredo ( talk) 10:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
I got a message from you saying you changed something I edited. I don't remember editing anything on the Worm article. Is there any way I can see what changes were made?
Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.96.201 ( talk • contribs) 10:26, 7 Jan 2008
Appreciate your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GTi16V ( talk • contribs) 16:30, 7 Jan 2008
URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nilanjan_Mukhopadhyay is being repeatedly vandalised. You have removed an instance of vandalism. Could you suggest ways to stop this completely.
Regards,
Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.134.110 ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 7 Jan 2008
The user didn't vandalize Bongwarrior's article. It merely greeted someone it considered to be a "Wikipedophile". It probably didn't even know where to go to properly do that. Blocking the user was unnecessary. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 21:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
That's just the thing. The last one it did wasn't vandalism. Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 21:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
That just flashed before my eyes the same way a bunch of clips from sixties' programs would. When you blocked him (the user) how did you "steal" it from Bongy-boy? Wilhelmina Will ( talk) 22:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Several people have been trying to talk me into going up for adminship. If I do, I'd like to have objective guidelines for determining the duration of a vandal's block. Having been impressed by your work, I'd like to ask how you pick durations. Thanks. Doczilla ( talk) 22:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page! Chetblong Talk Sign 01:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
70.228.252.94 has vandalized nitrogen as soon as your 48 hour block expired. I suggest perhaps a week, this time? Double length of block each time, until somebody at the other end (the IP admin for the school, probably) has their attention drawn to the problem. Can't be fixed except at the other end. S B H arris 20:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I've been working on List of cryptids and I'm going through the list's redlinks removing the ones which have been deleted due to notability issues, speedied, simply don't exist or ones which will never be created into a good article. I checked the Beast of Durham's deletion log and noticed you deleted it due to CSD#G1 and was wondering if you could say if it really was just drivel or if there is any potential to make a workable article? I checked google (-wikipedia) and it came up with only a few links; most of which were from crypto-nut pages and one from the BBC (Although it was only comprised of reader's sent-in accounts of various big cat sightings). Now I know absence of information doesn't equal information of absense, but do you think I should try and create the article, or will it not meet notability guidelines as I suspect? I can either create an article out of the info on the net, or I can simply remove the link from the list. I had the same problem with Flying humanoids which was deleted due to notability issues, but since I can't see the deleted content, I won't know if it was a poorly referenced page, or just nn full stop even with references. Anyway, I won't hold you up any longer, but I thought since you're an admin, you might have some insight. Cheers, Spawn Man ( talk) 23:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I've created Giant anaconda - was that the sort of thing you were thinking of (IE, do you think it'll be deleted?)? Cheers, Spawn Man ( talk) 00:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Why do you bother wasting your time with this site? 194.189.32.65 ( talk) 12:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Please don't cut&paste content from articles into another. The attribution of the original authors is an important part of the GFDL, you aren't the author of the content. Mentioning at least the 5 main authors of the content is required, and state where it was copied from (both in the edit summary). Best you include the edit history since this edit, e. g. at the talk page. Regards -- Oxymoron 83 23:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Ok, fine, apparently I don't know to do that from a technical standpoint. Would you move the soundtrack portion to its own webpage, as most soundtracks have their own page instead of eing merged into the article. Berenlazarus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Berenlazarus ( talk • contribs) 23:52, 10 Jan 2008
Very nice. Thank you. Doczilla ( talk) 01:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Please help clear the massive backlogs at AIV and RFPP Alex fusco 5 02:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
You’ve been awarded this barnstar. Partially because it spreads wikilove, but mostly because I’ve seen you around vandal fighting and I think you’ve done a good job. Kannie | talk 04:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
Thank you very much for protecting Automobile and so soon after I requested it. You've made a lot of people very happy I'm sure. Dino246 ( talk) 19:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
You do know that he didn't vandalise after the final warning you gave him? ClueBot beat you to the rv but you beat him to the warning, so he reported to aiv. I'm not questioning you block just thought you'd be interested to know -- Chris 00:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on the food chemistry article. I really appreciate it. Chris ( talk) 01:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my talk page I guess with my userpage protected they have to vandalize somewhere ;)
Alex
fusco
5
17:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
http://sev.prnewswire.com/publishing-information-services/20080111/DC1129510012008-1.html add this to PETA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.92.214.203 ( talk • contribs) 22:04, 12 Jan 2008
Yeah, I did. Thanks. I'm an idiot when it comes to this sort of thing. Thanks for your help. -- Bookworm857158367 ( talk) 23:33, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes, please go ahead and move the page/history/etc. and fix whatever I screwed up. I appreciate your help. -- Bookworm857158367 ( talk) 01:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I just created an article on Quincy (Ohio) in German, and used the infobox that includes a locator map. The coördinates are right, according to the US Census data, but the map shows it in the wrong place ( here is a proper illustration), and I don't know what to do. Do you know how to work with these maps? Nyttend ( talk) 19:34, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my talk page - before I even knew it was there. :) -- Ed ( Edgar181) 21:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my talk page. I've been dealing with that anonymous editor for the past week or so. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 23:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
What a relief to the editors (usually not me!) who work on Crusades to have it so promptly semi-protected for several months. This will be an immense help to continue improving the article instead of having to defend themselves against vandalism. Student7 ( talk) 01:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Do you know anything about Oxymoron2008 ( talk · contribs)? Is that you? Seems to be making good high-speed vandalism reverts much like you do so I'm confused. It's currently at WP:UAA. — Wknight94 ( talk) 15:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm very sorry for all my disruptive edits it was very silly of me and shouldn't be done agen, sorry
I LOVE BDSM —Preceding unsigned comment added by Purplepoo44 ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 14 Jan 2008
Many thanks for dealing with it. — alex.muller ( talk • edits) 00:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
After receiving a note regarding an article I had unintentionally posted (I am new to this and did not realize I had "saved" - horrors!) I deleted it myself. Evidently you and I deleted at the same moment, and so I am writing to you for help.
My question for you is - now that an article of that name has been deleted, will I be able to contribute a new one of the same name?
Thank you so much for your help!
Eileen
User:Kaomso has not responded for over a week to any of the objections to his proposal that is inconsistent with what a neutral party and I have agreed with. Is it appropriate to consider it an abandonment of the argument? Butterfly0fdoom ( talk) 04:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for keeping the vandalism off my user page! I haven't been on wikipedia for a while, so i didn't see it. Those jerks are so annoying! Thanks again. -- Turbokoala ( talk) 20:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
hmm excuse me but YOU *very wrongly* made a change back to what i had corrected.
for your info, russian names stay the same also after they'd been translated into english. seriously it's not called "vandalizing" BTW. the correction i made on "tsar niCHolaS II" was rightful since it should be called "tsar niKolaI II". not trying to be rude but please don't wrongly fix thing you don't know about. thank you.
P.S = it would be nice if you changed the names over on the wikipedia page "tsar niCHolaS II" since it's locked for other users.
sincerely, L+L —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liao446 ( talk • contribs) 00:17, 17 Jan 2008
I and put it right back! switched a few things. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnnathan ( talk • contribs) 00:28, 17 Jan 2008
Wow! 35 seconds for reverting that page! That was extremely quick! Wikipedia never fails to impress me! 69.37.38.50 ( talk) 01:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. You're very fast. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 02:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
why did you revert my edit?
i see why you did it. i edited the wrong version, sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.49.240.91 ( talk • contribs) 02:51, 17 Jan 2008
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. I always love it that people who spend their time messing things up tell us that we're the ones with no life. Have a great day. -Mastrchf91- 03:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
blocked? for editing what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.121.4.220 ( talk)
Thanks for that. I reported the bot because it kept removing the IPs which were blocked indefinitely by a now-inactive admin, who hasn't participated for quite a while (I think 2006 was his last contributions).
I'll try and avoid that next time, though. Thanks for the tip. I guess I learn from my mistakes here... this is one more to avoid!
Thanks, -- Solumeiras talk 13:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I wish to nominated the article Orion (constellation) to be semi-protected because of the extreme number of anonymous vandals editing that article. Considering it's a high profile article, an article children would be likely to look up, the detrimental effects of the vandalism to how Wikipedia looks as a whole, and the proportion that most edits are vandalism and reversions, I think semi-protection against anonymous users would be appropriate. Since the process requires a consensus on the article's talk page and you are one of the registered users who have reverted vandalism recently, I am writing in the hopes that you will go to the talk page and agree to the semi-protection. If we can get a convincing consensus, we can continue the process to the next step. Thanks for your time. -- Bark ( talk) 15:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Me and another user are having trouble with another editor over at the Johnnie Ray page. Basically, that editor is rolling back changes over several edits and removing maintenance tags for no real reason. We've had some issues with this same editor in the past so any attempts to compromise are pretty much out the window. Could you possibly step in and help as they've already resorted to name calling. Thanks! Pinkadelica ( talk) 18:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Qwertyqwert123 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (blocked indef), may be the same vandal as Niquefreak94 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) per this article Mike Jones (Rapper)-- Hu12 ( talk) 19:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
How do you delete a category? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2L84UBB ( talk • contribs) 05:12, 19 Jan 2008
How can I use Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.82.146.105 ( talk • contribs) 06:21, 19 Jan 2008
Hello, Oxymoron83. I think it is time to unprotect this article. Would it be reasonable for me to apply for unprotection? Screen stalker ( talk) 16:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Tariqabjotu, I've protected Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus some time ago to allow an undisturbed discussion at the case you mediate. The mediation and consensus building has made good progress but without a final conclusion. User:Screen stalker asked me to unprotect the page, but I don't want to do it prematurely what could worsen the situation. Do you think an unprotection should be tried now or is it better to wait some more days? -- Oxymoron 83 18:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello! Whilst browsing Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Requests I found this game had been requested and located some sources to interest a potential creator. After clicking on the link I found that it previously existed but the author requested deletion which you obliged. Does that mean that version is out-of-bounds or could it be brought back and sourced? Got the feeling deletion was requested because it was prodded or some discussion took place about notability. Here are the additional sources: [11] [12] [13]. Thanks. Someone another 17:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
...thank you for the revert. Was just scratching my head over whether I could do a 3RR violation report or not on Snark, so didn't notice it until I saw your warning on their talk page. Thanks again! Giles Bennett ( Talk, Contribs) 21:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
For the quick revert of my user page, humble though it may be. It's nice to know that we've got people watching our backs :) Xymmax ( talk) 21:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
:-) Sorry about that, I couldn't resist —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.162.122 ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 20 Jan 2008
After much thought and deliberation I have decided to return. Many wikians contacted me by various means and I truly appreciate the support from all of them. Man, did I need that wiki break! I have learned from it and will use the experience to improve. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that vandalization of my user page -- it's appreciated. Why is it the "YouTube celebrities" who get their noses so far out of joint when you suggest they don't have any notability? Accounting4Taste: talk 17:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Is protection necessary? Just curious what prompted that? Thanks, -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 18:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
FYI, the user who vandalized your page a couple of days ago under the names of "Kjgbnfjg", "Handsfudn nn5", "Nadjht45", "Abovelabel33", and "Efgnj" has turned out to be Primetime ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I don't know how you came to his attention. The latest socks are listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Primetime. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi I thought I would tell you about huggle, a new anti vandal tool that is very fast and helpful Alex fusco 5 00:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop blocking peoples accounts for faulse causes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aj00200 ( talk • contribs) -moved from user page by Onorem♠ Dil 16:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Is there a place where we can read the changes that this IP made? It is a public PC and we would hate to be banned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.230.191.51 ( talk • contribs) 01:22, 25 Jan 2008
Hi. You probably have notice alreasy, but the guy who is on a vandalism spree on Illinois-related articles, such as DuPage County, Illinois, seems to have some sleeper accounts created early in January. FlowerpotmaN·( t) 03:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Oxymoron83,
I saw something someone said a while ago on ANI: “...a block notice wasn't even left, leaving the user with no way to even know how to request an unblock...”. I’m pretty sure that’s not right, but it reminded me of something I’ve wondered about (for this very reason) for a while: what it’s actually like to be blocked. Especially, what information is given for how to get out of it.
I hope you don’t think of this as a frivolous request (it isn’t, I promise), but would you mind blocking my ( completely legit!) alternate account, User:Barneca sock 1 for say 15 minutes? With autoblock enabled, so I can see both the block screen for the blocked user, and the autoblock screen from User:Barneca too. I’m quite confident no one else is using this IP (it’s static). I won’t waste anyone’s time with an unblock request; I’ll wait for the 15 minutes to be up. The only possible hassle to other people I see is the possibility that the autoblock could malfunction, and not be lifted after the 15 minutes, and then I’ll have to pester someone with an un-autoblock request.
Scientizzle mistakenly (but in good faith!) blocked that account when I first created it, but I kind of knew what to do already, and was so busy getting the autoblock lifted, I didn’t take the time to pay attention to the specifics of what information was provided to the blocked editor. I know I could look at the mediawiki templates somewhere (I’ve done that before), but it isn’t the same. All the variables are empty, and it’s a jumble of brackets and really hard to see and understand what the blocked editor would actually see.
If this is ok with you, then thanks for the trouble, I'm ready when you are. If not, sorry for the bother. -- barneca ( talk) 22:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for that... I'm not sure we lost a lot on that one... -- Jayron32. talk. contribs 19:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi i'm new to wikipedia and i need some direction on creating new articles i'm a little confused please contact me back.......>>>>> user:jadawg19 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadawg19 ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 25 Jan 2008
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I award you this Barnstar, Oxymoron83 for reverting vandalism on my user page. Keep up the good work! -- The Helpful One (Talk) (Contribs) (Review) 19:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC) |
Sorry for "vandalizing". I obviously didn't know what the word meant. Thought I was just asking a question. I'll stop now. Please don't block me.
P.S.- Is the First Amendment valid in the Sandbox? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.214.200.200 ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 25 Jan 2008
Comment on content. OK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.214.200.200 ( talk • contribs) 20:10, 25 Jan 2008
Can I really be blocked without an account? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.214.200.200 ( talk • contribs) 20:12, 25 Jan 2008
Can I clear my record on Wikipedia? Can I get rid of the warnings?
-- 65.214.200.200 ( talk) 20:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
As I just noted on THO's page -- it was a copyvio [16] Sam Korn (smoddy) 20:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Oxymoron83, I was wondering: isn't an 8 hour block for that disruptive of an edit (an he's done other vandalisms too) a bit minor? I think Wikipedia needs to crack down on these vandals - I like undoing them, but I'm starting to get frustrated at so many. I know wikipedia has this open editing policy, and even still people can get an account and still vandalize. But it should only be a place for constructive editors to... well, edit. ~ GoldenGoose100 ( talk) 06:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
|
Thanks! | |
Oxymoron83/Archive 5, thank you for showing your support in
my RFA which passed with 38 support, 0 oppose, and 0 neutral! I also want to give special thanks to my Admin Coach and nominator,
Useight for all of his help and support. I promise that I'll give my best effort as an admin, and I hope that your confidence in me proves to be justified. If I can ever be of any help, please let me know. In the mean time, I have some
cleaning to do. Have a great day! Jauerback dude?/ dude. 20:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC) |
Hello , How are you i woluld be pleased if you help me build my wiki page on Federation of Nigeria Youth Greens. Here from you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Federation of Nigeria Youth Greens ( talk • contribs) 02:23, 31 Jan 2008
You once said that you worked with regexes to detect vandalism on VF... how would I use them too? Is there a list already made to import all the words that need to be detected? -- Menti fisto 11:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I would guess that this user, created today, is not you. Can you confirm this? Robert Ullmann ( talk) 15:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Some vandals are just more annoying than others. Thanks for blocking that "Powderbun" character. It never stops around here, does it? In any event, thanks for wielding the mop and bucket. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 16:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
PMDrive1061 (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi Gurch, you reverted 64.90.240.114 ( talk · contribs) at Jane Addams, but Huggle didn't place a warning. Was this because VoABot reported already to AIV after the level3 warning? -- Oxymoron 83 16:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Eh, wasn't really sure myself. I'd blocked a possible TougHHead just a couple of minutes before, and I'm not really popular with the vandals so I figured he'd come back to exact a little revenge. :-D east.718 at 23:03, January 31, 2008