Hi Oxforder! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Wikiacc ( ¶) 01:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Happy editing! Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Row hammer, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
13:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding, removing or
changing genres, as you did to
Can You Feel My Heart, without providing a
source or establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
14:06, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
I don’t understand! I reverted this edit /info/en/?search=Special:MobileDiff/1000946415 which seems to me as a vandalism; it appears to me in the « very likely have problem filter » Oxforder ( talk) 14:10, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
He didn’t provide reliable sources?!! Oxforder ( talk) 14:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
There is a misunderstanding
in Row hammer article I reverted a vandaliser’s edit. i reverted this one /info/en/?search=Special:MobileDiff/1000944392
You’re confusing me with the unregistered users Oxforder ( talk) 14:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Why aren’t you answering? Or you’re just a bot? Oxforder ( talk) 14:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Nier (video game). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
The edits to the article were explained in the edit summary, had a reference sourced directly from the creator of the game, and have a thread on the talk page. Your reverting of the article had no explanation whatsoever.
Also, please do not remove warnings from your talk page. See: Wikipedia:Removing warnings "Removing warnings for vandalism from one's talk page is also considered vandalism."
I would like to point out to other editors that, as can be seen from messages from others on this talk page, this user has been constantly reverting other editors' contributions rarely offering any reasoning or justification, similar to the case I warned them for above which they removed from their talk page without any acknowledgement twice, which should be taken into consideration in the future. 109.236.4.20 ( talk) 14:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Oh stop it!!! you’re not even a registered account, you’re vandalizing and replacing words here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000927540 My duty is to stop any vandalism whatever it is. And will continue doing so. Oxforder ( talk) 15:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Even if it’s explained on the talk page: you should discuss that with others and reach a consensus: when I look at this edit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000927540 Unnecessary words replacement and really looks like vandalism. I’m definitely going to undo this edit. And stop coping templates. I ain’t beat.
Oxforder ( talk) 19:23, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
1- You can’t use a video as a source 2- no one responded to you on talk page I don’t know whether your statement is true or false but it seems like a disruptive editing 3- stop the personal attack and don’t insult my editing Oxforder ( talk) 04:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
I once read that video cannot be a source This caused and is still causing a dispute in Omar Sharif article. This is a comment by an administrator on an unregistered user’s edit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/997096292 And doesn’t this edit look like a bad edit? Replacing sister with daughter? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000927540
Oxforder ( talk) 10:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
I’m editing on the Very likely have problems filter it came up to me and looks like a bad edit once I saw him replacing words here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000927540 I would like to note that I wasn’t meaning to say I have the upper hand on an unregistered user. But he without even talking to me gave me a warning. Anyway I’m sorry if I caused a problem for you.
Oxforder ( talk) 10:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
My edits were all explained on the edit summary and talk page, and the context for the daughter/sister thing should be clear if you actually read the article.
Please do not try to hide warnings by removing them from your talk page. See: Wikipedia:Removing warnings "Removing warnings for vandalism from one's talk page is also considered vandalism." You have previously been told this.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing. 08:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Stop using these templates you can’t use it haphazardly just for one edit you could’ve talked to me and explained your edits not just attacking. Oxforder ( talk) 14:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
1- That wasn’t an accusation that was an inquiry! When I saw that he made almost 1.5 million edits I thought this account was a bot
2- that Ip user is attacking other people and he did attack me as well he said to me I don’t speak English https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1001397570 Oxforder ( talk) 19:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I noticed when you warned said IP you did not sign the template and the template was not under the "January 2021" header. I'd suggest you enable Twinkle in your preferences (it's a semi-automated tool which will help you in this) and if you're interested in counter vandalism you might want to check out WP:CVU and WP:CVUA. Thanks! Bingobro (Chat) 16:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
It appears that you joined Wikipedia purely to revert other people's edits, and yet you are doing so carelessly. You undid an edit of mine without explaining why. You described this edit of someone else's as "possible vandalism"; it is no such thing. I have not checked any more of your edits but this is not acceptable. If you want to revert edits, you should be sure that a) you have a reason, and b) the reason is valid. 37.152.231.40 ( talk) 12:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
You were replacing words Like you did here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000394141. You replaced Car with bogan!! What’s Bogan?! And it’s better to write a summery to your edits to avoid problems. Oxforder ( talk) 13:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
This edit is a vandalism as well https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000523561 It’s a car festival without any additions. Also when you edit provide reliable sources that support your statement. Oxforder ( talk) 14:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Stop 🛑 Your pseudo warnings aren’t effective when you’re not a registered User. You did reached consensus for your edits and and you replaced words in a way which seems to me as a vandalism. Oxforder ( talk) 16:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
From your edits’ History I can see the vandalism you keep doing. This is an example; https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000791956 I don’t want to wast my time but as I’ve been saying: any vandalism will be edited by me Oxforder ( talk) 19:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Dear I reverted just one edit two days ago You didn’t talk respectfully with me you didn’t explain to me the matter you just started copying templates and gave me baseless warnings on the same one edit Until now there are 8 users who thanked me for my contributions I sometimes make mistakes yes I’m still a beginner I Déjà told you that your former edit seemed to me as a vandalism first because there were words changing second because you didn’t provide a reference in the article or edit summery you did in the talk page which i didn’t have access to. You edited the same page and I didn’t revert your edit!! Oxforder ( talk) 19:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
You could’ve talked to me something like: Why did you Undo my edit? See what I wrote on the talk page ! I would see it and simply undo my edit and express my apologies! 95% of my edits are responsible which is good for a beginner almost seven editors thanked me until now. Anyway I didn’t undo any of your edits besides that one. Oxforder ( talk) 19:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I meant to say I will undo any bad edits not specifically yours, and again you started off with a second level warning you could’ve place me in the the picture and explain what’s the matter. Oxforder ( talk) 20:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
You didn’t explain at first you did after attacking me Oxforder ( talk) 04:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Again your parlance is rather aggressive you gave me a second level warning for one edit! At least You should’ve gave a level one warning You called my editings disruptive just for one edit which gave me a false impression on you. First I thought to my self this user is coping templates and is giving people warnings without a proper consideration. I Made 450 edits I think 4 of them were not true and that could’ve been solved without warnings and accusation and teahouse I didn’t know that you neither me have the privilege of warning users I though the user should have the authority and authenticity to be able to warn other users this why I said you are not a even a registered user it’s not because I have the upper hand my account is 10 days old I have have no authority whatsoever Oxforder ( talk) 05:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Hi 1- I didn’t say I have the upper hand over Ip users, but this user gave me a second level warning and kept giving me warnings for the SAME edit just one edit and he started attacking me, he seemed irresponsible with these warning templates. He could’ve simply explain that he explain his edit on the talk page. He didn’t provide references in the the edit summery which gave me a false expression but he did that in the talk page he didn’t write check the talk page when I see this edit (replacing words) /info/en/?search=Special:MobileDiff/1000927540 his edit summer is not supported by references nor he wrote check the talk page. I reverted it he and he gave me warning 2- they attacked me at first: they could’ve talked and explain the matter to me This user called me a non English speaker, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000986138 he did that with other editors and his parlance is rather aggressive Just for one edit he called my editings disruptive. There are 5 users who thanked me B732, teach5, Fylindfotberserk, Naveen2002 and Zaian.
Oxforder ( talk) 04:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Oxforder! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Wikiacc ( ¶) 01:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Happy editing! Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Row hammer, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
13:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding, removing or
changing genres, as you did to
Can You Feel My Heart, without providing a
source or establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
14:06, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
I don’t understand! I reverted this edit /info/en/?search=Special:MobileDiff/1000946415 which seems to me as a vandalism; it appears to me in the « very likely have problem filter » Oxforder ( talk) 14:10, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
He didn’t provide reliable sources?!! Oxforder ( talk) 14:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
There is a misunderstanding
in Row hammer article I reverted a vandaliser’s edit. i reverted this one /info/en/?search=Special:MobileDiff/1000944392
You’re confusing me with the unregistered users Oxforder ( talk) 14:17, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Why aren’t you answering? Or you’re just a bot? Oxforder ( talk) 14:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Nier (video game). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
The edits to the article were explained in the edit summary, had a reference sourced directly from the creator of the game, and have a thread on the talk page. Your reverting of the article had no explanation whatsoever.
Also, please do not remove warnings from your talk page. See: Wikipedia:Removing warnings "Removing warnings for vandalism from one's talk page is also considered vandalism."
I would like to point out to other editors that, as can be seen from messages from others on this talk page, this user has been constantly reverting other editors' contributions rarely offering any reasoning or justification, similar to the case I warned them for above which they removed from their talk page without any acknowledgement twice, which should be taken into consideration in the future. 109.236.4.20 ( talk) 14:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Oh stop it!!! you’re not even a registered account, you’re vandalizing and replacing words here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000927540 My duty is to stop any vandalism whatever it is. And will continue doing so. Oxforder ( talk) 15:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Even if it’s explained on the talk page: you should discuss that with others and reach a consensus: when I look at this edit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000927540 Unnecessary words replacement and really looks like vandalism. I’m definitely going to undo this edit. And stop coping templates. I ain’t beat.
Oxforder ( talk) 19:23, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
1- You can’t use a video as a source 2- no one responded to you on talk page I don’t know whether your statement is true or false but it seems like a disruptive editing 3- stop the personal attack and don’t insult my editing Oxforder ( talk) 04:47, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
I once read that video cannot be a source This caused and is still causing a dispute in Omar Sharif article. This is a comment by an administrator on an unregistered user’s edit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/997096292 And doesn’t this edit look like a bad edit? Replacing sister with daughter? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000927540
Oxforder ( talk) 10:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
I’m editing on the Very likely have problems filter it came up to me and looks like a bad edit once I saw him replacing words here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000927540 I would like to note that I wasn’t meaning to say I have the upper hand on an unregistered user. But he without even talking to me gave me a warning. Anyway I’m sorry if I caused a problem for you.
Oxforder ( talk) 10:30, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
My edits were all explained on the edit summary and talk page, and the context for the daughter/sister thing should be clear if you actually read the article.
Please do not try to hide warnings by removing them from your talk page. See: Wikipedia:Removing warnings "Removing warnings for vandalism from one's talk page is also considered vandalism." You have previously been told this.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing. 08:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Stop using these templates you can’t use it haphazardly just for one edit you could’ve talked to me and explained your edits not just attacking. Oxforder ( talk) 14:25, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
1- That wasn’t an accusation that was an inquiry! When I saw that he made almost 1.5 million edits I thought this account was a bot
2- that Ip user is attacking other people and he did attack me as well he said to me I don’t speak English https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1001397570 Oxforder ( talk) 19:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I noticed when you warned said IP you did not sign the template and the template was not under the "January 2021" header. I'd suggest you enable Twinkle in your preferences (it's a semi-automated tool which will help you in this) and if you're interested in counter vandalism you might want to check out WP:CVU and WP:CVUA. Thanks! Bingobro (Chat) 16:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
It appears that you joined Wikipedia purely to revert other people's edits, and yet you are doing so carelessly. You undid an edit of mine without explaining why. You described this edit of someone else's as "possible vandalism"; it is no such thing. I have not checked any more of your edits but this is not acceptable. If you want to revert edits, you should be sure that a) you have a reason, and b) the reason is valid. 37.152.231.40 ( talk) 12:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
You were replacing words Like you did here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000394141. You replaced Car with bogan!! What’s Bogan?! And it’s better to write a summery to your edits to avoid problems. Oxforder ( talk) 13:00, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
This edit is a vandalism as well https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000523561 It’s a car festival without any additions. Also when you edit provide reliable sources that support your statement. Oxforder ( talk) 14:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Stop 🛑 Your pseudo warnings aren’t effective when you’re not a registered User. You did reached consensus for your edits and and you replaced words in a way which seems to me as a vandalism. Oxforder ( talk) 16:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
From your edits’ History I can see the vandalism you keep doing. This is an example; https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000791956 I don’t want to wast my time but as I’ve been saying: any vandalism will be edited by me Oxforder ( talk) 19:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Dear I reverted just one edit two days ago You didn’t talk respectfully with me you didn’t explain to me the matter you just started copying templates and gave me baseless warnings on the same one edit Until now there are 8 users who thanked me for my contributions I sometimes make mistakes yes I’m still a beginner I Déjà told you that your former edit seemed to me as a vandalism first because there were words changing second because you didn’t provide a reference in the article or edit summery you did in the talk page which i didn’t have access to. You edited the same page and I didn’t revert your edit!! Oxforder ( talk) 19:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
You could’ve talked to me something like: Why did you Undo my edit? See what I wrote on the talk page ! I would see it and simply undo my edit and express my apologies! 95% of my edits are responsible which is good for a beginner almost seven editors thanked me until now. Anyway I didn’t undo any of your edits besides that one. Oxforder ( talk) 19:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
I meant to say I will undo any bad edits not specifically yours, and again you started off with a second level warning you could’ve place me in the the picture and explain what’s the matter. Oxforder ( talk) 20:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
You didn’t explain at first you did after attacking me Oxforder ( talk) 04:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Again your parlance is rather aggressive you gave me a second level warning for one edit! At least You should’ve gave a level one warning You called my editings disruptive just for one edit which gave me a false impression on you. First I thought to my self this user is coping templates and is giving people warnings without a proper consideration. I Made 450 edits I think 4 of them were not true and that could’ve been solved without warnings and accusation and teahouse I didn’t know that you neither me have the privilege of warning users I though the user should have the authority and authenticity to be able to warn other users this why I said you are not a even a registered user it’s not because I have the upper hand my account is 10 days old I have have no authority whatsoever Oxforder ( talk) 05:15, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Hi 1- I didn’t say I have the upper hand over Ip users, but this user gave me a second level warning and kept giving me warnings for the SAME edit just one edit and he started attacking me, he seemed irresponsible with these warning templates. He could’ve simply explain that he explain his edit on the talk page. He didn’t provide references in the the edit summery which gave me a false expression but he did that in the talk page he didn’t write check the talk page when I see this edit (replacing words) /info/en/?search=Special:MobileDiff/1000927540 his edit summer is not supported by references nor he wrote check the talk page. I reverted it he and he gave me warning 2- they attacked me at first: they could’ve talked and explain the matter to me This user called me a non English speaker, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000986138 he did that with other editors and his parlance is rather aggressive Just for one edit he called my editings disruptive. There are 5 users who thanked me B732, teach5, Fylindfotberserk, Naveen2002 and Zaian.
Oxforder ( talk) 04:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)