I am not surprised to hear that additional information regarding Ryan/Sheehan/Sheahan has come to light since I created his page (which is now over eight years ago, apparently). At that time, I exchanged e-mails with Sean Forman about the matter, and the page was created based on that exchange. I would not be surprised if someone over at sabr.org (Peter Morris, if I had to guess -- I suspect the man's a wizard) or Retrosheet has dug up something new on the matter. In any case, do not feel as though you'd be stepping on my toes in changing the article to reflect such information. I appreciate your checking in with me, though! - Dewelar ( talk) 21:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Otrex! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hello Otrex, Please let me explain my action on the Hans Langsdorff's article. I've seen you removed a text with some sources and restored it at first since I thought it could be a vandalic deletion. Then I reread carefully your edit summary notes and checked the available sources. I concluded that my action was not fully appropriate and restored your version. I'm not introduced enough in the subject to have my own opinion but I considered your action sufficiently motivated. As concerns a possible page protection request, as per my experience, there is not enough vandalic activity to obtain such a measure, but if you notice that controversial edits continued, I would recommend to bring the issue to WP:RFC, where the subject is supposed to receive more attention and where you can add your comments and receive qualified suggestions. I will keep the page in my watchlist and I will be happy to try to assist you in the RfC procedure if necessary. Regards, -- DoebLoggs ( talk) 09:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
I am not surprised to hear that additional information regarding Ryan/Sheehan/Sheahan has come to light since I created his page (which is now over eight years ago, apparently). At that time, I exchanged e-mails with Sean Forman about the matter, and the page was created based on that exchange. I would not be surprised if someone over at sabr.org (Peter Morris, if I had to guess -- I suspect the man's a wizard) or Retrosheet has dug up something new on the matter. In any case, do not feel as though you'd be stepping on my toes in changing the article to reflect such information. I appreciate your checking in with me, though! - Dewelar ( talk) 21:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Otrex! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hello Otrex, Please let me explain my action on the Hans Langsdorff's article. I've seen you removed a text with some sources and restored it at first since I thought it could be a vandalic deletion. Then I reread carefully your edit summary notes and checked the available sources. I concluded that my action was not fully appropriate and restored your version. I'm not introduced enough in the subject to have my own opinion but I considered your action sufficiently motivated. As concerns a possible page protection request, as per my experience, there is not enough vandalic activity to obtain such a measure, but if you notice that controversial edits continued, I would recommend to bring the issue to WP:RFC, where the subject is supposed to receive more attention and where you can add your comments and receive qualified suggestions. I will keep the page in my watchlist and I will be happy to try to assist you in the RfC procedure if necessary. Regards, -- DoebLoggs ( talk) 09:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)