This is an archive of past discussions with Osiris. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
All Pages: | 1 - ... (up to 100) |
Hi some editors i think will find your indigenous to 'tribes' a bit confronting - tribes is a term that for some people might be offensive - have you a good source/idea of what and why you are doing the changes? Satu Suro 11:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Osiris! You recently removed a copyvio from the article Polysilicon depletion effect. The following portion has been re-written & checked for any further copyvios. It will be helpful if you can verify & concur. Thanks. Deepon ( talk) 15:18, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Osiris I have seen your message on the talk page and I will get back to it in some days. I appreciate your concern.
Wasim Mogal (
talk) 05:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Osiris, much of the info you removed in this edit predated the IIT project with the copyvio problem. Can you take another look, and let's try to identify what parts might actually be problematic, if any? Dicklyon ( talk) 18:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
After input from the other involved editor, which followed your suggestion, I left the parameter as blank. On the talk page, you said to notify you when it was resolved. Thank you for the advice, and I'm looking forward to working with you to establish it as a good article!
Thanks. -- Activism 1234 19:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
I won't be active until, well, until next week. Would it be a chance that you could hold the article until then??? -- TIAYN ( talk) 20:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
In response to whether it's still ongoing, the answer would be "yes, but very very little." In other words, there are some operations that Egypt is doing in response, but I don't think that this would affect its stability as a whole. Every few days, an extra line or two may be added, but I don't think it's a major stability change.
If you think it should be put on hold for a few weeks, then I guess that would be fine, and I'd notify you when it's "stable," while in the meantime you do a "quick check" so we can improve it until then.
Thanks. -- Activism 1234 04:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
I've gone through your comments and critique (much appreciated), and made the necessary changes (posted it on the GA review page). No rush. Also, if you don't want me commenting here when I update it, that's fine, just let me know. -- Activism 1234 00:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
I saw this, so please chime in at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Velebit. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 13:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey Osiris,
There hasn't been any activity on the GA review recently. When you get a chance, I'd appreciate it if you can move forward with the review. But no rush - don't worry.
Thanks. -- Activism 1234 22:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
I've responded to your comments. -- TIAYN ( talk) 13:33, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
With attribution, would the blog from the Telegraph be acceptable? I note that the Criticism of the IDF section is full of opinion-pieces, I wonder how this differs. Ankh. Morpork 15:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, sounds good to me! I've commented on its talk page. Graham 87 07:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the GA Review, I've responded, at Talk:The War for Late Night/GA1. — Cirt ( talk) 19:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Osiris, Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. [1] refers. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 05:32, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that you're moving articles into this category. However, the Queensland Labor Party and the Queensland branch of the Australian Labor Party are not the same thing, which means that you're moving the vast majority of them into the wrong category. Is it possible to fix this? The Drover's Wife ( talk) 01:43, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with Osiris. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
All Pages: | 1 - ... (up to 100) |
Hi some editors i think will find your indigenous to 'tribes' a bit confronting - tribes is a term that for some people might be offensive - have you a good source/idea of what and why you are doing the changes? Satu Suro 11:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Osiris! You recently removed a copyvio from the article Polysilicon depletion effect. The following portion has been re-written & checked for any further copyvios. It will be helpful if you can verify & concur. Thanks. Deepon ( talk) 15:18, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Osiris I have seen your message on the talk page and I will get back to it in some days. I appreciate your concern.
Wasim Mogal (
talk) 05:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Osiris, much of the info you removed in this edit predated the IIT project with the copyvio problem. Can you take another look, and let's try to identify what parts might actually be problematic, if any? Dicklyon ( talk) 18:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
After input from the other involved editor, which followed your suggestion, I left the parameter as blank. On the talk page, you said to notify you when it was resolved. Thank you for the advice, and I'm looking forward to working with you to establish it as a good article!
Thanks. -- Activism 1234 19:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
I won't be active until, well, until next week. Would it be a chance that you could hold the article until then??? -- TIAYN ( talk) 20:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
In response to whether it's still ongoing, the answer would be "yes, but very very little." In other words, there are some operations that Egypt is doing in response, but I don't think that this would affect its stability as a whole. Every few days, an extra line or two may be added, but I don't think it's a major stability change.
If you think it should be put on hold for a few weeks, then I guess that would be fine, and I'd notify you when it's "stable," while in the meantime you do a "quick check" so we can improve it until then.
Thanks. -- Activism 1234 04:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
I've gone through your comments and critique (much appreciated), and made the necessary changes (posted it on the GA review page). No rush. Also, if you don't want me commenting here when I update it, that's fine, just let me know. -- Activism 1234 00:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
I saw this, so please chime in at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Velebit. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 13:23, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey Osiris,
There hasn't been any activity on the GA review recently. When you get a chance, I'd appreciate it if you can move forward with the review. But no rush - don't worry.
Thanks. -- Activism 1234 22:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
I've responded to your comments. -- TIAYN ( talk) 13:33, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
With attribution, would the blog from the Telegraph be acceptable? I note that the Criticism of the IDF section is full of opinion-pieces, I wonder how this differs. Ankh. Morpork 15:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, sounds good to me! I've commented on its talk page. Graham 87 07:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the GA Review, I've responded, at Talk:The War for Late Night/GA1. — Cirt ( talk) 19:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Osiris, Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. [1] refers. Peacemaker67 ( send... over) 05:32, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that you're moving articles into this category. However, the Queensland Labor Party and the Queensland branch of the Australian Labor Party are not the same thing, which means that you're moving the vast majority of them into the wrong category. Is it possible to fix this? The Drover's Wife ( talk) 01:43, 20 January 2013 (UTC)