WP:CIVIL [1] Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous - Revision as of 15:23, 2007 February 6
WP:CIVIL [2] Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous - Revision as of 15:23, 2007 February 6
WP:CIVIL WP:NPA [3] User talk:BTfromLA Revision as of 05:45, 2007 March 16
WP:CIVIL WP:NPA [4] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Revision as of 16:26, 2007 March 13
(bold in original edit)
WP:DR WP:CIVIL WP:NPA User_talk:Justanother/Archive4#What_are_you_saying.2C_exactly.3F [5]
WP:DR WP:CIVIL WP:NPA User_talk:Justanother/Archive7#Blocked_for_24_hours [6]
(bold in original edit)
WP:DR WP:CIVIL WP:NPA [7] (requires format as above)
ill considered accusations of impropriety; failed to AGF
[8] (requires format as above)
WP:DE WP:CIVIL [9] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 22:16, 2007 March 4
WP:DE WP:CIVIL WP:NPA [10] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 02:03, 2007 March 5
WP:AGF WP:NPA WP:CIVIL [11] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 12:45, 2007 March 5
(strikethrough in original edit)
WP:AGF WP:NPA WP:CIVIL WP:NPOV [12] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 22:08, 2007 March 5
WP:CIVIL WP:AGF [13] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 06:26, 2007 March 8
Thanks"This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary (meaning your summary, Anynobody, not mine) is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section. (That means you and Smee stay out of there.)
WP:CIVIL WP:AGF WP:NPA [14] User talk:Justanother Revision as of 14:23, 2007 March 17
WP:CIVIL WP:AGF WP:POINT WP:NPA [15] User talk:Justanother Revision as of 06:50, 2007 March 17
(bold added for emphasis)
WP:AGF WP:CIVIL WP:NPA [16] User talk:Justanother Revision as of 04:00, 2007 March 17
WP:AGF WP:CIVIL WP:NPA WP:DE [17] User talk:Bishonen Revision as of 15:28, 2007 March 7
"And finally the false accusation of PA. Smee is back and true to form."
WP:AGF WP:CIVIL WP:NPA WP:DE [18] User talk:Bishonen Revision as of 15:30, 2007 March 7
WP:NPA WP:CIVIL WP:DE [19] Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Barbara Schwarz (4th nomination) Revision as of 12:36, 2007 March 13
WP:VANDAL WP:POINT WP:AGF WP:DE [21] Talk:Barbara Schwarz Revision as of 15:51, 2007 February 16
WP:POINT WP:AGF WP:COI [22] User talk:Justanother Revision as of 21:05, 2007 February 14
(bold added for emphasis)
WP:POINT WP:DE [ [23]] Talk:Barbara Schwarz Revision as of 15:53, 2007 February 16
WP:POINT WP:AGF [24] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 16:34, 2007 March 4
Wikipedia:Deletion_Policy#Abuse_of_deletion_process XfD (deletion) processes are not a way to complain or remove material that is personally disliked, whose perspective is against ones beliefs, or which is not yet presented neutrally.
[25] Talk:Barbara Schwarz Revision as of 14:08, 2007 February 20 "....the only real reason she is here is because some editors here have an agenda to discredit Scientology..."
RS needed for "HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 AUGUST 1960"
Please add DIFFS citing evidence of PA, abuse of process, uncivil behavior, etc., in this section. Please follow the format as shown above. Orsini
Please add comments in this section. Please also remember WP policies regarding civility and personal attacks while doing so. Orsini
"Smeelgova was simultaneously reported to WP:AN3RR by User:Justanother, a supporter of BabyD, who produced the 3RR report by daintily picking out Smeelgova's reverts from the much more egregious sea of BabyD's. Smeelgova was found by another admin (as I didn't want to be making all the calls) not to have violated 3RR. [33]."
Location: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive202#Disruptive_editor, and DIFF. Smee 12:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC).
*Justanother referred to as "a supporter" of a subsequently banned disruptive/abusive editor, User:BabyDweezil - Here was the relevant quote from Admin User:Bishonen regarding Justanother's inappropriate behaviour, reporting of a false 3RR:
I think this incident is a good example of Justanother's history of using WP:3RR to harass Smee, but we ought to concentrate on Justanother's abuses. Mentioning him as a supporter of a banned disruptive editor might distract people. BabyDweezil's behavior almost made Justanother look like a saint. Anynobody 01:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
WP:CIVIL [1] Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous - Revision as of 15:23, 2007 February 6
WP:CIVIL [2] Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous - Revision as of 15:23, 2007 February 6
WP:CIVIL WP:NPA [3] User talk:BTfromLA Revision as of 05:45, 2007 March 16
WP:CIVIL WP:NPA [4] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Revision as of 16:26, 2007 March 13
(bold in original edit)
WP:DR WP:CIVIL WP:NPA User_talk:Justanother/Archive4#What_are_you_saying.2C_exactly.3F [5]
WP:DR WP:CIVIL WP:NPA User_talk:Justanother/Archive7#Blocked_for_24_hours [6]
(bold in original edit)
WP:DR WP:CIVIL WP:NPA [7] (requires format as above)
ill considered accusations of impropriety; failed to AGF
[8] (requires format as above)
WP:DE WP:CIVIL [9] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 22:16, 2007 March 4
WP:DE WP:CIVIL WP:NPA [10] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 02:03, 2007 March 5
WP:AGF WP:NPA WP:CIVIL [11] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 12:45, 2007 March 5
(strikethrough in original edit)
WP:AGF WP:NPA WP:CIVIL WP:NPOV [12] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 22:08, 2007 March 5
WP:CIVIL WP:AGF [13] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 06:26, 2007 March 8
Thanks"This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary (meaning your summary, Anynobody, not mine) is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section. (That means you and Smee stay out of there.)
WP:CIVIL WP:AGF WP:NPA [14] User talk:Justanother Revision as of 14:23, 2007 March 17
WP:CIVIL WP:AGF WP:POINT WP:NPA [15] User talk:Justanother Revision as of 06:50, 2007 March 17
(bold added for emphasis)
WP:AGF WP:CIVIL WP:NPA [16] User talk:Justanother Revision as of 04:00, 2007 March 17
WP:AGF WP:CIVIL WP:NPA WP:DE [17] User talk:Bishonen Revision as of 15:28, 2007 March 7
"And finally the false accusation of PA. Smee is back and true to form."
WP:AGF WP:CIVIL WP:NPA WP:DE [18] User talk:Bishonen Revision as of 15:30, 2007 March 7
WP:NPA WP:CIVIL WP:DE [19] Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Barbara Schwarz (4th nomination) Revision as of 12:36, 2007 March 13
WP:VANDAL WP:POINT WP:AGF WP:DE [21] Talk:Barbara Schwarz Revision as of 15:51, 2007 February 16
WP:POINT WP:AGF WP:COI [22] User talk:Justanother Revision as of 21:05, 2007 February 14
(bold added for emphasis)
WP:POINT WP:DE [ [23]] Talk:Barbara Schwarz Revision as of 15:53, 2007 February 16
WP:POINT WP:AGF [24] User talk:Anynobody Revision as of 16:34, 2007 March 4
Wikipedia:Deletion_Policy#Abuse_of_deletion_process XfD (deletion) processes are not a way to complain or remove material that is personally disliked, whose perspective is against ones beliefs, or which is not yet presented neutrally.
[25] Talk:Barbara Schwarz Revision as of 14:08, 2007 February 20 "....the only real reason she is here is because some editors here have an agenda to discredit Scientology..."
RS needed for "HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 AUGUST 1960"
Please add DIFFS citing evidence of PA, abuse of process, uncivil behavior, etc., in this section. Please follow the format as shown above. Orsini
Please add comments in this section. Please also remember WP policies regarding civility and personal attacks while doing so. Orsini
"Smeelgova was simultaneously reported to WP:AN3RR by User:Justanother, a supporter of BabyD, who produced the 3RR report by daintily picking out Smeelgova's reverts from the much more egregious sea of BabyD's. Smeelgova was found by another admin (as I didn't want to be making all the calls) not to have violated 3RR. [33]."
Location: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive202#Disruptive_editor, and DIFF. Smee 12:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC).
*Justanother referred to as "a supporter" of a subsequently banned disruptive/abusive editor, User:BabyDweezil - Here was the relevant quote from Admin User:Bishonen regarding Justanother's inappropriate behaviour, reporting of a false 3RR:
I think this incident is a good example of Justanother's history of using WP:3RR to harass Smee, but we ought to concentrate on Justanother's abuses. Mentioning him as a supporter of a banned disruptive editor might distract people. BabyDweezil's behavior almost made Justanother look like a saint. Anynobody 01:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)