Hello, I'm
Arbor8. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Martin Heinrich seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks, Your additions are clear violations of several wikipedia policies, including RS, NPOV and notability.
Arbor8 (
talk) 15:58, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Martin Heinrich, you may be
blocked from editing. I don't want to edit war, so I'm asking you to self-revert your problematic edits.
Arbor8 (
talk) 16:10, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Organthief1949! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message automatically delivered by your friendly neighborhood HostBot ( talk) 04:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
You removed quite a bit of uncontroversial content from Sherrod Brown (alma mater, committee assignments, prior campaigns, etc) citing the fact that it was unsourced, when a simple search would have turned up sources easily. In the future, please either add a citation needed tag or at least try to find the cite yourself before engaging in mass deletions. Thanks! Arbor8 ( talk) 17:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at
Sherrod Brown, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Arbor8 (
talk) 20:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello! I'd like to start by thanking you for your contributions to Wikipedia. BLPs can be hard to stay on top of when it comes to people adding contentious and uncensored information.
I'm a little concerned that you've now removed content twice citing that the references don't even mention Brown. Fortunately, browsers allow us to verify that claim almost instantly. Both times Brown in fact was mentioned in the articles. I assume you missed those mentions so I thought I'd let you know about the search function in browsers that can be used by press Ctrl+f. Typing in "Sherrod" or "Brown" will quickly let you jump through the reference to see where his name is used.
I don't mean to belittle or sound condescending if you were already aware of this function but I don't know how else to justify your actions other than you simply made a mistake.
On a side note, do you have any sort of connection to Sherrod Brown, Josh Mandel, or Connie Schultz? OlYeller21 Talktome 20:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
You've been involved in enough warring at Sherrod Brown that it would make sense for you propose changes on the talk page *first* and then wait for responses. In the August dispute that led to full protection, you seemed to be making uninformed changes that ignored the plain language of the reference that was provided establishing Sherrod Brown's role in the CAFTA debate. It is easy to forgive one mistake, but not so easy when you continue reverting thereafter. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:06, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Arbor8. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a
neutral point of view. Your recent edit to
Martin Heinrich seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks, Your additions are clear violations of several wikipedia policies, including RS, NPOV and notability.
Arbor8 (
talk) 15:58, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at
Martin Heinrich, you may be
blocked from editing. I don't want to edit war, so I'm asking you to self-revert your problematic edits.
Arbor8 (
talk) 16:10, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Organthief1949! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message automatically delivered by your friendly neighborhood HostBot ( talk) 04:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC) |
You removed quite a bit of uncontroversial content from Sherrod Brown (alma mater, committee assignments, prior campaigns, etc) citing the fact that it was unsourced, when a simple search would have turned up sources easily. In the future, please either add a citation needed tag or at least try to find the cite yourself before engaging in mass deletions. Thanks! Arbor8 ( talk) 17:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at
Sherrod Brown, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Arbor8 (
talk) 20:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello! I'd like to start by thanking you for your contributions to Wikipedia. BLPs can be hard to stay on top of when it comes to people adding contentious and uncensored information.
I'm a little concerned that you've now removed content twice citing that the references don't even mention Brown. Fortunately, browsers allow us to verify that claim almost instantly. Both times Brown in fact was mentioned in the articles. I assume you missed those mentions so I thought I'd let you know about the search function in browsers that can be used by press Ctrl+f. Typing in "Sherrod" or "Brown" will quickly let you jump through the reference to see where his name is used.
I don't mean to belittle or sound condescending if you were already aware of this function but I don't know how else to justify your actions other than you simply made a mistake.
On a side note, do you have any sort of connection to Sherrod Brown, Josh Mandel, or Connie Schultz? OlYeller21 Talktome 20:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
You've been involved in enough warring at Sherrod Brown that it would make sense for you propose changes on the talk page *first* and then wait for responses. In the August dispute that led to full protection, you seemed to be making uninformed changes that ignored the plain language of the reference that was provided establishing Sherrod Brown's role in the CAFTA debate. It is easy to forgive one mistake, but not so easy when you continue reverting thereafter. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:06, 14 September 2012 (UTC)