|
As reviewing administrator, I have redirected your article on Rob O'Brien to the article on his company, because I do not think he is separately notable, and this avoids deleting it altogether.
The company is probably notable, but it has a problem with promotionalism. It's necessary to avoid adjectives or phrases of praise about its services, and to avoid relying on press releases, such as reference 10. I urge you to quickly revise the article, making sure to include true third party sources, not based on company publicity, I'll check back ytomorrow; if you don't fix it, I will. DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Logistics Bureau for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Logistics Bureau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logistics Bureau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE ( talk) 15:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
|
As reviewing administrator, I have redirected your article on Rob O'Brien to the article on his company, because I do not think he is separately notable, and this avoids deleting it altogether.
The company is probably notable, but it has a problem with promotionalism. It's necessary to avoid adjectives or phrases of praise about its services, and to avoid relying on press releases, such as reference 10. I urge you to quickly revise the article, making sure to include true third party sources, not based on company publicity, I'll check back ytomorrow; if you don't fix it, I will. DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Logistics Bureau for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Logistics Bureau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logistics Bureau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE ( talk) 15:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)