From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Union of Socialist Forces, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius ( talk) 16:51, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

I am sorry but unlike the previous editors, I did provide sources as to the facts I provided despite my lack of experience in using source code - hence it took me a while to add the sources to the "ideology" section. In any event, the USF's "anti-NATO" stance is a defining quality of the Alliance and its anti-clericalism is mentioned in the article itself. This is not "disruption", this is information - besides, there is no entry in the talk page and I do not know who I am having the "dispute" with. OrderOfTheOldRepublic ( talk) 00:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply
FYI, the sources hitherto added are: soL Haber (affiliated with the Communist Party of Turkey), BirGün (affiliated with the Left Party), Gazete Manifesto (affiliated with the Communist Movement of Turkey) and Cumhuriyet (prominent opposition newspaper). If you erase the aforementioned information again, kindly state your motives at the article's talk page. OrderOfTheOldRepublic ( talk) 01:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply
One more thing: the Left Party does not hail from the Marxist-Leninist tradition. Back when they were ÖDP, there were Luxemburgist and Trotskyist currents in the party. Currently they can be best described as Marxist revolutionary socialists (in view of their programme). In other words, Marxism-Leninism is not a common trait of the Union of Socialist Forces, even though the majority of the parties (TKP, TKH, DH) are Marxist-Leninist parties. OrderOfTheOldRepublic ( talk) 01:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Union of Socialist Forces, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius ( talk) 16:51, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

I am sorry but unlike the previous editors, I did provide sources as to the facts I provided despite my lack of experience in using source code - hence it took me a while to add the sources to the "ideology" section. In any event, the USF's "anti-NATO" stance is a defining quality of the Alliance and its anti-clericalism is mentioned in the article itself. This is not "disruption", this is information - besides, there is no entry in the talk page and I do not know who I am having the "dispute" with. OrderOfTheOldRepublic ( talk) 00:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply
FYI, the sources hitherto added are: soL Haber (affiliated with the Communist Party of Turkey), BirGün (affiliated with the Left Party), Gazete Manifesto (affiliated with the Communist Movement of Turkey) and Cumhuriyet (prominent opposition newspaper). If you erase the aforementioned information again, kindly state your motives at the article's talk page. OrderOfTheOldRepublic ( talk) 01:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply
One more thing: the Left Party does not hail from the Marxist-Leninist tradition. Back when they were ÖDP, there were Luxemburgist and Trotskyist currents in the party. Currently they can be best described as Marxist revolutionary socialists (in view of their programme). In other words, Marxism-Leninism is not a common trait of the Union of Socialist Forces, even though the majority of the parties (TKP, TKH, DH) are Marxist-Leninist parties. OrderOfTheOldRepublic ( talk) 01:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook