Account closed. User has created new account under
WP:Clean start and will not be editing from this one
|
---|
![]() {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} , but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
TN
X
Man
19:05, 6 January 2012 (UTC)![]() Orartu ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log)) Request reason: I had to create that account to do some useful contributions in wikipedia, because with User:Orartu account my time has been wasted in nonesense discussions, I had forgotten to inform one of the admins about it.I didn't abuse that account.-- Orartu ( talk) 04:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Decline reason: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Nick-D ( talk) 05:12, 7 January 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. ![]() Orartu ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log)) Request reason: My account is blocked because of abusing multiple accounts, but I had created other account according to Legitimate uses,Privacy, I thought I had done according to rules, because my ulternate account is not included Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts Orartu (talk) 5:19 am, Today (UTC+0) Accept reason: Orartu appears to have intended to create a clean start account. SilkTork ✔Tea time 19:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC) I'd like a little more information regarding the abuse of multiple accounts. The accounts are handled by the same person, but how was that discovered? Looking at the contributions I see no cross-over edits, so why were the accounts checked? SilkTork ✔Tea time 11:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC
|
The article Chilla Gejasi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Alborz Fallah (
talk)
11:21, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Account closed. User has created new account under
WP:Clean start and will not be editing from this one
|
---|
![]() {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} , but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
TN
X
Man
19:05, 6 January 2012 (UTC)![]() Orartu ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log)) Request reason: I had to create that account to do some useful contributions in wikipedia, because with User:Orartu account my time has been wasted in nonesense discussions, I had forgotten to inform one of the admins about it.I didn't abuse that account.-- Orartu ( talk) 04:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Decline reason: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Nick-D ( talk) 05:12, 7 January 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. ![]() Orartu ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log)) Request reason: My account is blocked because of abusing multiple accounts, but I had created other account according to Legitimate uses,Privacy, I thought I had done according to rules, because my ulternate account is not included Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts Orartu (talk) 5:19 am, Today (UTC+0) Accept reason: Orartu appears to have intended to create a clean start account. SilkTork ✔Tea time 19:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC) I'd like a little more information regarding the abuse of multiple accounts. The accounts are handled by the same person, but how was that discovered? Looking at the contributions I see no cross-over edits, so why were the accounts checked? SilkTork ✔Tea time 11:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC
|
The article Chilla Gejasi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Alborz Fallah (
talk)
11:21, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)