This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | → | Archive 65 |
Archive 48: November 2018
If I knew how to write you on our thread from last week, I would do that as you have been super cool. Cited newspaper sources on my Draft Laura page, when yr time permits to hopefully bring credit list back from the dead. Toys I voiced for these popular characters-and action figures made, not sure type of link to provide. Thank you much! Happy Halloween Laura Summer Truthfeelsgood ( talk) 00:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Look at me answering you back in the correct area. Fabulous. Thank you for your input and assistance! That's fine, as most important thing is having my name restored on cast lists.17:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Truthfeelsgood (
talk •
contribs)
The name of the Garfield episode June Foray won her 2012 Emmy "The Garfield Show" was "Which, Witch" as Mrs. Cauldron. Mrs. Cauldron is the character that plays opposite twins Drusilla and Minerva. I voiced both twin girls (Druisilla and Minerva).
Truthfeelsgood (
talk) 17:34, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello again: Is there any movement to the mainspace? Can I provide anything else? Thanks so much for your assistance
Truthfeelsgood (
talk)
19:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Will circle back after Turkey Day. Thanks for responding so quickly.00:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthfeelsgood ( talk • contribs)
Thank you so very much! This is such an incredible relief. Thank you!!! Have a picture to add but need technical clarification :) Pix is at San Diego Comic-con and taken with my phone. Please advise exactly how do I fill out form or do you do it? Best. Laura Truthfeelsgood ( talk) 04:23, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry but I don't think your opinion is right. The WP:BIO1E said that "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate." Besides, if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. I believe this article meets such rules. If you think it should be deleted, I think you should nominate it to WP:AfD rather than reverting the article directly.-- クオン· 翡翠·鵺鳥·十姉妹·夜啼鳥 12:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi ::@ Onel5969:. Regarding the The Ananya Panday page you reverted some time ago. And the Explanation given was "Restore redirect of non-notable, highly non-neutral stub". The stub contained only 3 Line in general all of which are true and notable. Being a Movie Lead actress. And Endorsing an International Brand. Moreover being the youngest star to do so. Are these not Notable facts and I have provided credible links for all. Hence I didnt really Understand the reason for removing the stub.( Purplecart ( talk) 14:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC))
However if You feel anything is Biased let me. I will look into it ::@ Onel5969: ( Purplecart ( talk) 14:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC))
Hello O. I hope you are well. I am reading Michael Palin's diaries and am enjoying them immensely. In July of 1988 he was in New York for the press tour for A Fish Called Wanda. On the night of Wednesday the 6th he and Jamie Lee Curtis saw a performance of Much Ado About Nothing in Central Park. It starred Kevin Kline and Blythe Danner. Palin mentions how much he liked it and how he was impressed by Danner. Did you get to see this? Maybe even on the same night? I found this interesting review. Just thinking about seeing Brian Murray, Dylan Baker, Phoebe Cates, David Pierce and Jerry Stiller together makes my mind boggle. Best regards. MarnetteD| Talk 07:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
1. If you mean reviewing drafts at AfC, the guideline is that it should is passed if it is likely to pass AfD. The current consensus is that this means at least at 66% probable that it will pass, In practice, many of us use a higher percentage. , much more like 80%. This , like all guidelines, depends on the circumstances--if its a article where it is always disputed andthe result unpredictable, it should in my opinion go to afd to be decided there. If it's just very weak, it should be strengthened first. IThe rationale for improvement is that a really poorly formatted article or one with seriously unclear references is much less likely to pass AfD, even if it would otherwise deserve to. t's matter of judgement whether you strengthen it yourself or tell the submitter to do so and resubmit. If it's an draft on a topic where you cannot judge whether it would pass, let someone else review it.
2. NPP is different: articles don't pass or not pass NPP; rather they get sorted into the appropriate disposition: speedy deletion, blp prod, prod, AfD, just tagging, or good enough to not even need tagging. Sorting is done according to the guidelines for each process. If it unquestionably must be deleted because of one of the problems listed at WP:SPEEDY, it must be either listed for speedy or immediately fixed. If it's an unreferenced blp, it must be tagged blp prod or some other deletion process. Otherwise, if you are fairly sure the deletion will be uncontroversial and nobody will object, use Prod. Since even the original contributor can remove a prod, there is no point using it if the contributor is around and likely to remove the prod without fixing the article. Otherwise, if you think it should be deleted according to our guidelines, use AfD. It is OK to use afd if you just can't tell whether it should or should not be deleted, because in such a case, the community should judge, but if the reason you can't tell is that you don't understand the subject, let someone else review it.
3.How much work to devote to fixing an article depends on whether you know how to do it for that subject, whether you think that it can in fact be fixed with the knowledge and resources and time you have available,--and whether you want to do it. Some people like fixing, some don't. Nobody is required to fix an article they'd rather not work on. Sometimes I will try to fix an article because I suspect nobody else qualified is likely to do it. Sometimes I will fix in order to encourage a new contributor. Sometimes I will fix because I try to fix everything in that area that can possibly be fixed. Sometimes the only way to see if an article can be fixed is to try, and sometimes I try, but then give up, saying in the deletion nomination that I tried but found it unfixable--this is true both for not being able to find expected references, or finding an article is so promotional that if I remove the promotion, nothing is left.
4. As I and others keep saying ,the way to learn the necessary judgement about what can be fixed and what is hopeless is to join in afd discussions. DGG ( talk ) 01:04, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your kind help and attention to making Wikipedia more accessible to new editors. Sincerely, Shashi Sushila Murray, ( message me) 05:55, 8 November 2018 (UTC) |
There's possible sockpuppets (or undisclosed multiples accounts) editing articles related to Bigg Boss Malayalam. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiyas Kareem. Some of the accounts ( Hbinu) are now blocked. Rest of the accounts ( Emissary_j, Greatest_of_all_times, Putput23) are also suspicious because they are single-purpose accounts editing particular pages only and are mutually co-operating with each other for the same. -- 116.6.107.172 ( talk) 15:24, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I came across this. It appears to have been corrected now, and I hope this is an isolated case. But, you remember there was an ANI case earlier this year, which would have likely resulted in a topic ban if you hadn't stepped in and volunteered to refrain from fixing dablinks. Now, I'm not sure if this necessarily means you shouldn't be fixing any dablinks now, but it's definitely a good idea to at least tread careefully. – Uanfala (talk) 01:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. What did you think you were doing at https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=On_Lexington&action=history given we already had On Lexington & 52nd Street? -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 17:18, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for thanking me for the redirect at Angel Tee. I noticed that your identical effort has been reverted three times with no actual improvement to the article. I now have that page on my watchlist, and if my latest redirect is reverted, I will let you know and then one of should probably take it to AfD. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 18:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fennesz + Patton. Since you had some involvement with the Fennesz + Patton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- 70.51.45.46 ( talk) 05:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sauce Lapin, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
PRehse ( talk) 15:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Elmidae. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Benjamin Conner (engineer), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 14:41, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969,
Bro, i have added many verified references and citations to the page Draft: Peer Ki Gali that indicates its existence. and still you moved this page to draft. I don't know why you did so. As long as the history of "Aliabad Sarai" and saint Nund Reshi is concerned, you did right. Due to the lake of online ancient history, i was unable to provide the references. I visited this place in July, 2018 and i collected all the possible evidences from old people who are living there. If you still want to keep this page in draft then i'll regret over this matter. Thanks ( Farooqahmadbhat ( talk) 16:36, 15 November 2018 (UTC))
Hi, would rework on Mekala Snehalatha by this weekend. Thanks. Meher Mansion ( talk) 05:41, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. |
Hello Onel5969,
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello again O. If you are interested next Friday this program about Hal Prince is airing. Last nights show about John Leguizamo was fascinating. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 17:25, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Nita Sofiani, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
PRehse ( talk) 13:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Onel5969. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Sara Ali Khan regarding one issue with which you may have been involved, as you edited that BLP. Thank You. 119.160.117.2 ( talk) 20:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing Dalibor Bojović, Onel5969.
Unfortunately Boleyn has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
Looking over; a few concerns to tag for, e.g. no clear refs or cats.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Boleyn ( talk) 14:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
User:Onel5969 please don't refer this arcle to the list of cognitive biases. The list contains items with their own article and this item deserves an article of itself as well. The article can be expanded or it can be argued that it should be renamed, merged or moved to the frequency illusion. But don't just remove the article and redirect to a list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renetus ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969, as suggested I have edited references/weblinks as well as categories. Would these changes be enough at the moment? Best, -- Neomicro ( talk) 06:33, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Can you help me delete this namespace? -- hueman1 (talk) 12:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | → | Archive 65 |
Archive 48: November 2018
If I knew how to write you on our thread from last week, I would do that as you have been super cool. Cited newspaper sources on my Draft Laura page, when yr time permits to hopefully bring credit list back from the dead. Toys I voiced for these popular characters-and action figures made, not sure type of link to provide. Thank you much! Happy Halloween Laura Summer Truthfeelsgood ( talk) 00:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Look at me answering you back in the correct area. Fabulous. Thank you for your input and assistance! That's fine, as most important thing is having my name restored on cast lists.17:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Truthfeelsgood (
talk •
contribs)
The name of the Garfield episode June Foray won her 2012 Emmy "The Garfield Show" was "Which, Witch" as Mrs. Cauldron. Mrs. Cauldron is the character that plays opposite twins Drusilla and Minerva. I voiced both twin girls (Druisilla and Minerva).
Truthfeelsgood (
talk) 17:34, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello again: Is there any movement to the mainspace? Can I provide anything else? Thanks so much for your assistance
Truthfeelsgood (
talk)
19:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Will circle back after Turkey Day. Thanks for responding so quickly.00:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthfeelsgood ( talk • contribs)
Thank you so very much! This is such an incredible relief. Thank you!!! Have a picture to add but need technical clarification :) Pix is at San Diego Comic-con and taken with my phone. Please advise exactly how do I fill out form or do you do it? Best. Laura Truthfeelsgood ( talk) 04:23, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry but I don't think your opinion is right. The WP:BIO1E said that "If the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate." Besides, if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. I believe this article meets such rules. If you think it should be deleted, I think you should nominate it to WP:AfD rather than reverting the article directly.-- クオン· 翡翠·鵺鳥·十姉妹·夜啼鳥 12:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi ::@ Onel5969:. Regarding the The Ananya Panday page you reverted some time ago. And the Explanation given was "Restore redirect of non-notable, highly non-neutral stub". The stub contained only 3 Line in general all of which are true and notable. Being a Movie Lead actress. And Endorsing an International Brand. Moreover being the youngest star to do so. Are these not Notable facts and I have provided credible links for all. Hence I didnt really Understand the reason for removing the stub.( Purplecart ( talk) 14:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC))
However if You feel anything is Biased let me. I will look into it ::@ Onel5969: ( Purplecart ( talk) 14:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC))
Hello O. I hope you are well. I am reading Michael Palin's diaries and am enjoying them immensely. In July of 1988 he was in New York for the press tour for A Fish Called Wanda. On the night of Wednesday the 6th he and Jamie Lee Curtis saw a performance of Much Ado About Nothing in Central Park. It starred Kevin Kline and Blythe Danner. Palin mentions how much he liked it and how he was impressed by Danner. Did you get to see this? Maybe even on the same night? I found this interesting review. Just thinking about seeing Brian Murray, Dylan Baker, Phoebe Cates, David Pierce and Jerry Stiller together makes my mind boggle. Best regards. MarnetteD| Talk 07:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
1. If you mean reviewing drafts at AfC, the guideline is that it should is passed if it is likely to pass AfD. The current consensus is that this means at least at 66% probable that it will pass, In practice, many of us use a higher percentage. , much more like 80%. This , like all guidelines, depends on the circumstances--if its a article where it is always disputed andthe result unpredictable, it should in my opinion go to afd to be decided there. If it's just very weak, it should be strengthened first. IThe rationale for improvement is that a really poorly formatted article or one with seriously unclear references is much less likely to pass AfD, even if it would otherwise deserve to. t's matter of judgement whether you strengthen it yourself or tell the submitter to do so and resubmit. If it's an draft on a topic where you cannot judge whether it would pass, let someone else review it.
2. NPP is different: articles don't pass or not pass NPP; rather they get sorted into the appropriate disposition: speedy deletion, blp prod, prod, AfD, just tagging, or good enough to not even need tagging. Sorting is done according to the guidelines for each process. If it unquestionably must be deleted because of one of the problems listed at WP:SPEEDY, it must be either listed for speedy or immediately fixed. If it's an unreferenced blp, it must be tagged blp prod or some other deletion process. Otherwise, if you are fairly sure the deletion will be uncontroversial and nobody will object, use Prod. Since even the original contributor can remove a prod, there is no point using it if the contributor is around and likely to remove the prod without fixing the article. Otherwise, if you think it should be deleted according to our guidelines, use AfD. It is OK to use afd if you just can't tell whether it should or should not be deleted, because in such a case, the community should judge, but if the reason you can't tell is that you don't understand the subject, let someone else review it.
3.How much work to devote to fixing an article depends on whether you know how to do it for that subject, whether you think that it can in fact be fixed with the knowledge and resources and time you have available,--and whether you want to do it. Some people like fixing, some don't. Nobody is required to fix an article they'd rather not work on. Sometimes I will try to fix an article because I suspect nobody else qualified is likely to do it. Sometimes I will fix in order to encourage a new contributor. Sometimes I will fix because I try to fix everything in that area that can possibly be fixed. Sometimes the only way to see if an article can be fixed is to try, and sometimes I try, but then give up, saying in the deletion nomination that I tried but found it unfixable--this is true both for not being able to find expected references, or finding an article is so promotional that if I remove the promotion, nothing is left.
4. As I and others keep saying ,the way to learn the necessary judgement about what can be fixed and what is hopeless is to join in afd discussions. DGG ( talk ) 01:04, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your kind help and attention to making Wikipedia more accessible to new editors. Sincerely, Shashi Sushila Murray, ( message me) 05:55, 8 November 2018 (UTC) |
There's possible sockpuppets (or undisclosed multiples accounts) editing articles related to Bigg Boss Malayalam. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiyas Kareem. Some of the accounts ( Hbinu) are now blocked. Rest of the accounts ( Emissary_j, Greatest_of_all_times, Putput23) are also suspicious because they are single-purpose accounts editing particular pages only and are mutually co-operating with each other for the same. -- 116.6.107.172 ( talk) 15:24, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I came across this. It appears to have been corrected now, and I hope this is an isolated case. But, you remember there was an ANI case earlier this year, which would have likely resulted in a topic ban if you hadn't stepped in and volunteered to refrain from fixing dablinks. Now, I'm not sure if this necessarily means you shouldn't be fixing any dablinks now, but it's definitely a good idea to at least tread careefully. – Uanfala (talk) 01:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. What did you think you were doing at https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=On_Lexington&action=history given we already had On Lexington & 52nd Street? -- Tagishsimon ( talk) 17:18, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for thanking me for the redirect at Angel Tee. I noticed that your identical effort has been reverted three times with no actual improvement to the article. I now have that page on my watchlist, and if my latest redirect is reverted, I will let you know and then one of should probably take it to AfD. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 18:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fennesz + Patton. Since you had some involvement with the Fennesz + Patton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- 70.51.45.46 ( talk) 05:26, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sauce Lapin, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
PRehse ( talk) 15:05, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Elmidae. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Benjamin Conner (engineer), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 14:41, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Onel5969,
Bro, i have added many verified references and citations to the page Draft: Peer Ki Gali that indicates its existence. and still you moved this page to draft. I don't know why you did so. As long as the history of "Aliabad Sarai" and saint Nund Reshi is concerned, you did right. Due to the lake of online ancient history, i was unable to provide the references. I visited this place in July, 2018 and i collected all the possible evidences from old people who are living there. If you still want to keep this page in draft then i'll regret over this matter. Thanks ( Farooqahmadbhat ( talk) 16:36, 15 November 2018 (UTC))
Hi, would rework on Mekala Snehalatha by this weekend. Thanks. Meher Mansion ( talk) 05:41, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. |
Hello Onel5969,
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello again O. If you are interested next Friday this program about Hal Prince is airing. Last nights show about John Leguizamo was fascinating. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 17:25, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Nita Sofiani, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
PRehse ( talk) 13:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Onel5969. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Sara Ali Khan regarding one issue with which you may have been involved, as you edited that BLP. Thank You. 119.160.117.2 ( talk) 20:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing Dalibor Bojović, Onel5969.
Unfortunately Boleyn has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
Looking over; a few concerns to tag for, e.g. no clear refs or cats.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Boleyn ( talk) 14:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
User:Onel5969 please don't refer this arcle to the list of cognitive biases. The list contains items with their own article and this item deserves an article of itself as well. The article can be expanded or it can be argued that it should be renamed, merged or moved to the frequency illusion. But don't just remove the article and redirect to a list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renetus ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Dear Onel5969, as suggested I have edited references/weblinks as well as categories. Would these changes be enough at the moment? Best, -- Neomicro ( talk) 06:33, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Can you help me delete this namespace? -- hueman1 (talk) 12:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)