Lance Armstrong also has personal life.-- Jingandteller ( talk) 17:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
People are equal. Jin Jing has her own right to get an article on her in wikipedia, just as Lance Armstrong does. Firstly we should add the sentence that she is single.-- Jingandteller ( talk) 17:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
why is guarding pov?-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Guarding refers to protecting. She is an athlete and a torchbearer not a protector of the torch.
We can go to the talk page.-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
why?-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Please do not undo. Your sentence is wrong. They are pro-tibetan, not as you said.-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
09:13, 18 October 2006 Humus sapiens (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 31 hours (You were repeatedly warned and still chose to continue vandalism) 11:53, 24 August 2006 PinchasC (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 56 hours (3rr on Human rights in Israel) 02:00, 16 August 2006 Blnguyen (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (fake signatures on Talk:Israel) 21:42, 7 August 2006 Stifle (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR violation at Human rights in Israel) 20:48, 19 July 2006 Avraham (Talk | contribs) unblocked Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs) (Archived, not deleted) 17:52, 19 July 2006 Avraham (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 hours (Removed userpage warnings after fourth-level notice) 12:07, 8 July 2006 KillerChihuahua (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (vandalism) 09:05, 29 June 2006 Humus sapiens (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (repeated vandalism is this user's only contribution, even after numerous warnings)
-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Please be aware my userpage is not a soapbox for you to vandalize.
I just show you what you did before.-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Oiboy. Long time no speak. In general you should not put protection templates on unprotected pages. Is there a reason why you would want your talk page protected? -- Avi ( talk) 19:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Please assume good faith in the actions of other editors. Threatening to protect pages is inappropriate behaviour; especially when A) you don't have the admin privileges to do so and B) admins caught in an edit war don't protect pages simply to support/exclude a particular POV. Please show more restraint and thought in your future edits. Likewise with your talk page; other I looked through the history and other editors were not using as a sopabox. -- Madchester ( talk) 17:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
You will also note that your mass-reversion removed about a dozen minor improvements which Jingandteller was trying to add to the article. I see no such consensus on the talk page. Details on her personal history that are public are welcome to the article, in my opinion, because they are far less controversial than the torch relay.
Your edit removed a substantial amount of personal history, as well as removing the improvements made to nearly all the references. The only section you appear to disagree with is the "2008 Summer Olympics torch relay" section. Mass revisions help no-one, and lead to edit wars. I suggest you work more carefully with the new material, rather than simply denouncing it as products of the "CCP propogandists". nneonneo talk 16:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Lance Armstrong also has personal life.-- Jingandteller ( talk) 17:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
People are equal. Jin Jing has her own right to get an article on her in wikipedia, just as Lance Armstrong does. Firstly we should add the sentence that she is single.-- Jingandteller ( talk) 17:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
why is guarding pov?-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Guarding refers to protecting. She is an athlete and a torchbearer not a protector of the torch.
We can go to the talk page.-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
why?-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Please do not undo. Your sentence is wrong. They are pro-tibetan, not as you said.-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
09:13, 18 October 2006 Humus sapiens (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 31 hours (You were repeatedly warned and still chose to continue vandalism) 11:53, 24 August 2006 PinchasC (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 56 hours (3rr on Human rights in Israel) 02:00, 16 August 2006 Blnguyen (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (fake signatures on Talk:Israel) 21:42, 7 August 2006 Stifle (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR violation at Human rights in Israel) 20:48, 19 July 2006 Avraham (Talk | contribs) unblocked Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs) (Archived, not deleted) 17:52, 19 July 2006 Avraham (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 hours (Removed userpage warnings after fourth-level notice) 12:07, 8 July 2006 KillerChihuahua (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (vandalism) 09:05, 29 June 2006 Humus sapiens (Talk | contribs) blocked "Oiboy77 (Talk | contribs)" with an expiry time of 1 week (repeated vandalism is this user's only contribution, even after numerous warnings)
-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:35, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Please be aware my userpage is not a soapbox for you to vandalize.
I just show you what you did before.-- Jingandteller ( talk) 18:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Oiboy. Long time no speak. In general you should not put protection templates on unprotected pages. Is there a reason why you would want your talk page protected? -- Avi ( talk) 19:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Please assume good faith in the actions of other editors. Threatening to protect pages is inappropriate behaviour; especially when A) you don't have the admin privileges to do so and B) admins caught in an edit war don't protect pages simply to support/exclude a particular POV. Please show more restraint and thought in your future edits. Likewise with your talk page; other I looked through the history and other editors were not using as a sopabox. -- Madchester ( talk) 17:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
You will also note that your mass-reversion removed about a dozen minor improvements which Jingandteller was trying to add to the article. I see no such consensus on the talk page. Details on her personal history that are public are welcome to the article, in my opinion, because they are far less controversial than the torch relay.
Your edit removed a substantial amount of personal history, as well as removing the improvements made to nearly all the references. The only section you appear to disagree with is the "2008 Summer Olympics torch relay" section. Mass revisions help no-one, and lead to edit wars. I suggest you work more carefully with the new material, rather than simply denouncing it as products of the "CCP propogandists". nneonneo talk 16:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)