From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OhWhyNot, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi OhWhyNot! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni ( I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Paranoia

Yes I'm a paranoid man. Thanks for nothing, Anon :) I'll be visiting the TeaHouse shortly. 05:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Potentially controversial content about living persons requires highly reliable sourcing

Information icon Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply

As linked above, reliable sources are those with a reputation for fact checking, accuracy and editorial oversight - peer reviewed academic papers, major newspapers, books from traditional publishers (not vanity presses/self published). -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:36, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply

I left a message on your talk page, and you censored it. OhWhyNot ( talk) 02:52, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply


Fine. I'll use The Guardian instead. It's a liberal newspaper, so you should be happy. OhWhyNot ( talk) 02:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Lena Dunham (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Please do not edit war and do not insert material that violates WP:BLP. If you want to ask whether it is ok to post ridiculous commentary framed as "molestation", do so at WP:BLPN. However, continuting to add such material to the article may lead to a block. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Lawls. I added a source to the "Not my Kind of Girl" section. Jesus. The repressive tolerance you two demonstrate is so obvious. What you see as ridiculous, I see as important . OhWhyNot ( talk) 02:49, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OhWhyNot, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi OhWhyNot! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni ( I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Paranoia

Yes I'm a paranoid man. Thanks for nothing, Anon :) I'll be visiting the TeaHouse shortly. 05:29, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Potentially controversial content about living persons requires highly reliable sourcing

Information icon Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:30, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply

As linked above, reliable sources are those with a reputation for fact checking, accuracy and editorial oversight - peer reviewed academic papers, major newspapers, books from traditional publishers (not vanity presses/self published). -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:36, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply

I left a message on your talk page, and you censored it. OhWhyNot ( talk) 02:52, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply


Fine. I'll use The Guardian instead. It's a liberal newspaper, so you should be happy. OhWhyNot ( talk) 02:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Lena Dunham (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Please do not edit war and do not insert material that violates WP:BLP. If you want to ask whether it is ok to post ridiculous commentary framed as "molestation", do so at WP:BLPN. However, continuting to add such material to the article may lead to a block. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:47, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Lawls. I added a source to the "Not my Kind of Girl" section. Jesus. The repressive tolerance you two demonstrate is so obvious. What you see as ridiculous, I see as important . OhWhyNot ( talk) 02:49, 2 July 2015 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook