This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 60 | ← | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | Archive 64 | Archive 65 | Archive 66 | Archive 67 |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Could you file another SPI on the user. If it is a sock, then the article can be deleted. Looks like you are having way too much fun with the idiot. Bgwhite ( talk) 07:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
See edit war at Brahma page VictoriaGrayson Talk 19:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I wish to know why you are constantly removing the links in the Aghori page. They are websites related to the argument. Regards
Damrumya — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damrumya ( talk • contribs) 10:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
No, You are wrong, the first link is completely in English, the other two are both english and italian, don't you see the flags on the top of websites? Anyway what I provided is an english link. Have you tried to click on them to see?
This is not spam, but pages where you may get more information on the argument.
Try to learn some respect for others.
Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damrumya ( talk • contribs) 10:16, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
The argument is Aghori and Bhagwan Ram ji, and my website talk about them, have you check out? I'm not linking something with course or economic interest or not related with the argument of pages. This not spam, please. Try to understand. You are giving reasons without knowing, as you before was stating that they where only in Italian when they where not.
So I will insert my link again and please think for your problems instead of giving troubles to others. You are not God and you have not the right to judge only on the basis of your limited experience and knowledge.
Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damrumya ( talk • contribs) 10:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
You are invited! →
World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership ← Come and join us remotely! | |
---|---|
World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership
Dates: 7 to 20 September 2015 The Virtual Edit-a-thon, hosted by Women in Red, will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in Leadership to participate. As it is a two-week event, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in leadership. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and find more details →here← -- Ipigott ( talk) 09:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Ogress! It seems that User:Stevenloveswaffles15 keeps changing various Korean articles from "kingdom" to "empire" without any explanations. Do you know what is the best way to handle it, thanks! -- Cartakes ( talk) 01:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
It has been verified that goguryeo rulers since the reign of Gwanggaeto the Great have used the title of "Taewang" which is an equivalent imperial rank as the Chinese "emperor". Therefore, rulers should be Taewang not just Wang.-- Stevenloveswaffles15 ( talk) 02:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Taewang — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenloveswaffles15 ( talk • contribs) 01:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
So i made a new section and wrote about the reasons why it should be changed. Does somebody need to give me approval to change it or something or can i go ahead and change it right now? And how would i know im allowed to change it if someone does give me approval? Stevenloveswaffles15 ( talk) 02:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Asian Pacific American Women World Virtual Edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello!
First, on behalf of WikiProject X, thank you for trying out the WikiProject X pilot projects. I would like to get some anonymous feedback from you on your experience using the new WikiProject layout and tools. This way, we will know what we did right, and if we did something horribly wrong, we can try to fix it. This feedback won't be associated with your username, so please be completely honest. We are determined to improve the experience of Wikipedians, and your feedback helps us with that. (You are also welcome to leave non-anonymous feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject X.)
Please complete the survey here. The survey has two parts: the first part asks for your username, while the second part contains the survey questions. These two parts are stored separately, so your username will not be associated with your feedback. There are only nine questions and it should not take very long to complete. Once you complete the survey I will leave a handwritten note on your talk page as a token of my appreciation.
Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Harej ( talk) 17:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
... based on this. While the new stuff isn't a category add, it's about the 10th page nominated for merge into the dynasty article in under 24 hours. Noting here since I don't want to clutter up that discussion.— Spaceman Spiff 07:32, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to disturb you, but I wanted to confirm if this is considered as a scholarly source as per Wikipedia Norms for adding dates and events in Timeline of Jainism. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=MDBpq23-0QoC written by John Cort -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo ( talk · contribs · count) 18:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks I'm not adding anything to world history nor anything about who says what. I am just adding Temples and idols dating to Timeline of Jainism. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo ( talk · contribs · count) 18:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Re-registered as Cydaemon ( talk · contribs), then got promptly blocked. To his credit, he didn't attempt to hide his identity. - Zanhe ( talk) 07:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
You just reverted my edits on these pages with an edit summary "very dated and POV". I added a comprehensive and detailed account on the origin of the word Naga and all of it reliably sourced with published material. You cannot simply revert because you felt uncomfortable about the content. I'm reverting your edit as of now and please start a discussion in the talk if you found any factual error in my edit or at least explain where exactly did you feel I was trying to push POV. Malayala Sahityam ( talk) 19:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Would you like to help in Peer Review of Mahavira? Thanks in advance -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo ( talk · contribs · count) 21:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Regarding User talk:EdJohnston#Cydevil38(00) is clearly back, I don't have any clear idea of what to do next. My guess is you probably are filing some SPI reports. I am willing to consider semiprotecting more articles on Korean history. If there are long-term wars, especially involving registered accounts, it is helpful to make a summary of the questions on the talk page of some relevant Wikiproject. EdJohnston ( talk) 00:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Your move log shows many main space articles being moved and sadly they were mostly undiscussed moves. I came to notice this because of the currently on-going discussion at Talk:Jñāneśvar. Can you please justify these moves? Better would be to revert them, get admin's help if needed and start discussions on individual pages. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 08:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 60 | ← | Archive 62 | Archive 63 | Archive 64 | Archive 65 | Archive 66 | Archive 67 |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Could you file another SPI on the user. If it is a sock, then the article can be deleted. Looks like you are having way too much fun with the idiot. Bgwhite ( talk) 07:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
See edit war at Brahma page VictoriaGrayson Talk 19:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I wish to know why you are constantly removing the links in the Aghori page. They are websites related to the argument. Regards
Damrumya — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damrumya ( talk • contribs) 10:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
No, You are wrong, the first link is completely in English, the other two are both english and italian, don't you see the flags on the top of websites? Anyway what I provided is an english link. Have you tried to click on them to see?
This is not spam, but pages where you may get more information on the argument.
Try to learn some respect for others.
Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damrumya ( talk • contribs) 10:16, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
The argument is Aghori and Bhagwan Ram ji, and my website talk about them, have you check out? I'm not linking something with course or economic interest or not related with the argument of pages. This not spam, please. Try to understand. You are giving reasons without knowing, as you before was stating that they where only in Italian when they where not.
So I will insert my link again and please think for your problems instead of giving troubles to others. You are not God and you have not the right to judge only on the basis of your limited experience and knowledge.
Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damrumya ( talk • contribs) 10:55, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
You are invited! →
World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership ← Come and join us remotely! | |
---|---|
World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Leadership
Dates: 7 to 20 September 2015 The Virtual Edit-a-thon, hosted by Women in Red, will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in Leadership to participate. As it is a two-week event, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in leadership. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and find more details →here← -- Ipigott ( talk) 09:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Ogress! It seems that User:Stevenloveswaffles15 keeps changing various Korean articles from "kingdom" to "empire" without any explanations. Do you know what is the best way to handle it, thanks! -- Cartakes ( talk) 01:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
It has been verified that goguryeo rulers since the reign of Gwanggaeto the Great have used the title of "Taewang" which is an equivalent imperial rank as the Chinese "emperor". Therefore, rulers should be Taewang not just Wang.-- Stevenloveswaffles15 ( talk) 02:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Taewang — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenloveswaffles15 ( talk • contribs) 01:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
So i made a new section and wrote about the reasons why it should be changed. Does somebody need to give me approval to change it or something or can i go ahead and change it right now? And how would i know im allowed to change it if someone does give me approval? Stevenloveswaffles15 ( talk) 02:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Asian Pacific American Women World Virtual Edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello!
First, on behalf of WikiProject X, thank you for trying out the WikiProject X pilot projects. I would like to get some anonymous feedback from you on your experience using the new WikiProject layout and tools. This way, we will know what we did right, and if we did something horribly wrong, we can try to fix it. This feedback won't be associated with your username, so please be completely honest. We are determined to improve the experience of Wikipedians, and your feedback helps us with that. (You are also welcome to leave non-anonymous feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject X.)
Please complete the survey here. The survey has two parts: the first part asks for your username, while the second part contains the survey questions. These two parts are stored separately, so your username will not be associated with your feedback. There are only nine questions and it should not take very long to complete. Once you complete the survey I will leave a handwritten note on your talk page as a token of my appreciation.
Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Harej ( talk) 17:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
... based on this. While the new stuff isn't a category add, it's about the 10th page nominated for merge into the dynasty article in under 24 hours. Noting here since I don't want to clutter up that discussion.— Spaceman Spiff 07:32, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to disturb you, but I wanted to confirm if this is considered as a scholarly source as per Wikipedia Norms for adding dates and events in Timeline of Jainism. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=MDBpq23-0QoC written by John Cort -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo ( talk · contribs · count) 18:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks I'm not adding anything to world history nor anything about who says what. I am just adding Temples and idols dating to Timeline of Jainism. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo ( talk · contribs · count) 18:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Re-registered as Cydaemon ( talk · contribs), then got promptly blocked. To his credit, he didn't attempt to hide his identity. - Zanhe ( talk) 07:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
You just reverted my edits on these pages with an edit summary "very dated and POV". I added a comprehensive and detailed account on the origin of the word Naga and all of it reliably sourced with published material. You cannot simply revert because you felt uncomfortable about the content. I'm reverting your edit as of now and please start a discussion in the talk if you found any factual error in my edit or at least explain where exactly did you feel I was trying to push POV. Malayala Sahityam ( talk) 19:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Would you like to help in Peer Review of Mahavira? Thanks in advance -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo ( talk · contribs · count) 21:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Regarding User talk:EdJohnston#Cydevil38(00) is clearly back, I don't have any clear idea of what to do next. My guess is you probably are filing some SPI reports. I am willing to consider semiprotecting more articles on Korean history. If there are long-term wars, especially involving registered accounts, it is helpful to make a summary of the questions on the talk page of some relevant Wikiproject. EdJohnston ( talk) 00:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Your move log shows many main space articles being moved and sadly they were mostly undiscussed moves. I came to notice this because of the currently on-going discussion at Talk:Jñāneśvar. Can you please justify these moves? Better would be to revert them, get admin's help if needed and start discussions on individual pages. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 08:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)