Civility Award | ||
For keeping calm in the face of adversity; well done Chzz ► 18:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC) |
If you can keep your head when all about you, Are losing theirs and blaming it on you
Chzz ► 18:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Felicitări pentru articol; vreau de mult să scriu pe această temă. Acum, nu uita să citezi surse sub forma de note ca să ştim mai precis de unde provin informaţiile. Recomand cel puţin o nota pe paragraf. - Biruitorul Talk 10:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi Octavian,
I'm translating your article on Hungarian-Romanian War into Hungarian. I'd like to use the images Hu-RO War1919 phase3.jpg and Hu-RO War1919 phase3.jpg, please upload them to the commons. Mulţumesc, Renard, 16:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Renard de hongrie ( talk • contribs)
Hi again,
In the meantime I've begun to make some own maps based on yours and others. For I'll have to cite the sources, please let me know from where your maps originate, in what book(s) they were published.
You wrote in the section Aftermath: The troops supporting Horthy were supplied with arms by the Romanian Army. In the regions under their control, the Romanians took over police and administration duties. I never heard about it and couldn't find any data or resources; please provide some. Mulţumesc again, renard de hongrie ( talk) 22:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Yes, please give me the exact page numbers referring to this case, and if possible, some short quotation from the text as well. I also will need the numbers of pages which the two maps can be found on, in order to make a precise reference to my resources when my maps are ready. If you like, I can make the same maps with English labels as well, or make blank maps without any labels, then you can provide them with Romanian labels. Hi, renard de hongrie ( talk) 13:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Thank you. See the new maps here. renard de hongrie ( talk) 11:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
[1] Baxter9 ( talk) 15:39, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Salut! Sorry for my late answer! The boundaries of the country were established in 1920 after the Treaty of Trianon. Therefore the HSR fought " de jure" in Upper Hungary, Kingdom of Hungary against the Czechoslovak forces. Baxter9 ( talk) 12:13, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Transylvania was part of Hungary. The romanian forces reached the border of Hungary not of "Principality of Transylvania" it was dissolved. (1867) Your edits (the old border) are redundant, not accurate and misleading. Baxter9 ( talk) 13:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Koertefa ( talk) 05:01, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
[2] Fakirbakir ( talk) 15:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Attack? What do you mean? You understate facts and history and you do not accept either an argument. You so handle that article, as if it would be your property. I would rather believe such historians like Mária Ormos or Ignác Romsics, not you, who denied the obvious fact of lootings. So you can go to hell together with your threatening. -- Norden1990 ( talk) 15:21, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of
edit warring. Users are expected to
collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. List of edits of what I mean:
So not only does it seem that there is an edit war there, you seem to have edit warred as well. LikeLakers2 ( talk | Sign my guestbook!) 20:23, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
If I take a look at that Talk page:
The main difficulty in reaching consensus is to truly understand the other and to respect him and his ideas. During our conversation until now I have constantly tried to understand you and to reach an agreement with you only to be rebuked by you, because I want to stick to the facts and you want comments that promote your views. I have also not shown any disrespect towards any of you, only to be insulted by one of these Hungarian editors (Norden1990) and to be constantly and baselessly accused by another one (Koertefa). Octavian8 ( talk) 14:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Octavian8, I will only be able to continue our marathon-style discussion (which I enjoy by the way) on the article (especially on the Aftermath section) next week. Thanks for your patience, Koertefa ( talk) 04:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Octavian! You have not given any reason for yor repeated tagging. You are engaging in edit-warring. I do not know how long this can go on. If you have a problem with my sources why don't you discuss it on the discussion page. I actually liked your having found appropriate quotes from Oltean, but we must stay as close to the original text of these respectable secondary sources as possible, given the delicate nature of the subject. We also must devote more time to doing due diligence on our sources and use only secondary sources from the recent post-Ceausescu years simply because now there is complete freedom of ideas and research in Romania as at respected western universities where for example Oltean works. Eravian ( talk) 11:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Dr.William Faulkner: As I have pointed out many times before publication through a major, respected international news organization such as the BBC or RAI Italian national television is absulutely appropriate and acceptable for Wikipedia. The real important thing though is that the author is an archeologist and the editor of a major archeology journal i.e. Current Archeology. Professor Dr.Livio Zerbini: Same argument as I have described many times before. Publishing through a major international news organization is acceptable and appropriate. Why is it so difficult to understand that the head of the Archeology department of a major university does have high international standing. You may check with the University of Ferrara, Italy, as I have done and find out yourself. He is a nice man. he will answer your E-mail.
Eravian ( talk) 13:57, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, since i am having some unusual problems on this article, i would like you to invite as a neutral party to try to resolve this problem. Thank you. iadrian ( talk) 20:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
I have added the NPOV disputed since the article clearly contains only the Hungarian POV. It would be great if you could find some English sources because Romanian/Hungarian are not so reliable about this subject. Greetings. iadrian ( talk) 15:23, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
buna ziua, am vazut pe pagina de discutii de la Khotin Uprising ca detineti surse bune referitoare la aceasta rascoala. daca sunteti dispus pot rescrie eu acest articol. deja am contribuit semnificativ la Tatarbunary Uprising si il voi termina in 1-2 sapt (sper). daca sunteti amabil putem sa colaboram. cu stima. Prometeu ( talk) 17:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
You were mentioned here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#I_would_like_to_report_the_activities_of_some_editors_.E2.80.93_ethnic_abuse_and_edit_warring_from_the_side_of_eastern_european_editors -- Samofi ( talk) 10:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
What do you think about this title above? Would it be suitable for page of Allied Interventions in Hungary? It is a book title. [3] Fakirbakir ( talk) 14:23, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards! |
-- Codrin.B ( talk) 22:20, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards! |
-- Codrin.B ( talk) 15:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
I would gladly participate, within the limits of the available free time. Octavian8 ( talk) 17:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Anonimu and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Codrin.B ( talk) 02:51, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Civility Award | ||
For keeping calm in the face of adversity; well done Chzz ► 18:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC) |
If you can keep your head when all about you, Are losing theirs and blaming it on you
Chzz ► 18:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Felicitări pentru articol; vreau de mult să scriu pe această temă. Acum, nu uita să citezi surse sub forma de note ca să ştim mai precis de unde provin informaţiile. Recomand cel puţin o nota pe paragraf. - Biruitorul Talk 10:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi Octavian,
I'm translating your article on Hungarian-Romanian War into Hungarian. I'd like to use the images Hu-RO War1919 phase3.jpg and Hu-RO War1919 phase3.jpg, please upload them to the commons. Mulţumesc, Renard, 16:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Renard de hongrie ( talk • contribs)
Hi again,
In the meantime I've begun to make some own maps based on yours and others. For I'll have to cite the sources, please let me know from where your maps originate, in what book(s) they were published.
You wrote in the section Aftermath: The troops supporting Horthy were supplied with arms by the Romanian Army. In the regions under their control, the Romanians took over police and administration duties. I never heard about it and couldn't find any data or resources; please provide some. Mulţumesc again, renard de hongrie ( talk) 22:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Yes, please give me the exact page numbers referring to this case, and if possible, some short quotation from the text as well. I also will need the numbers of pages which the two maps can be found on, in order to make a precise reference to my resources when my maps are ready. If you like, I can make the same maps with English labels as well, or make blank maps without any labels, then you can provide them with Romanian labels. Hi, renard de hongrie ( talk) 13:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Thank you. See the new maps here. renard de hongrie ( talk) 11:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
[1] Baxter9 ( talk) 15:39, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Salut! Sorry for my late answer! The boundaries of the country were established in 1920 after the Treaty of Trianon. Therefore the HSR fought " de jure" in Upper Hungary, Kingdom of Hungary against the Czechoslovak forces. Baxter9 ( talk) 12:13, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Transylvania was part of Hungary. The romanian forces reached the border of Hungary not of "Principality of Transylvania" it was dissolved. (1867) Your edits (the old border) are redundant, not accurate and misleading. Baxter9 ( talk) 13:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Koertefa ( talk) 05:01, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
[2] Fakirbakir ( talk) 15:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Attack? What do you mean? You understate facts and history and you do not accept either an argument. You so handle that article, as if it would be your property. I would rather believe such historians like Mária Ormos or Ignác Romsics, not you, who denied the obvious fact of lootings. So you can go to hell together with your threatening. -- Norden1990 ( talk) 15:21, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of
edit warring. Users are expected to
collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. List of edits of what I mean:
So not only does it seem that there is an edit war there, you seem to have edit warred as well. LikeLakers2 ( talk | Sign my guestbook!) 20:23, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
If I take a look at that Talk page:
The main difficulty in reaching consensus is to truly understand the other and to respect him and his ideas. During our conversation until now I have constantly tried to understand you and to reach an agreement with you only to be rebuked by you, because I want to stick to the facts and you want comments that promote your views. I have also not shown any disrespect towards any of you, only to be insulted by one of these Hungarian editors (Norden1990) and to be constantly and baselessly accused by another one (Koertefa). Octavian8 ( talk) 14:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Octavian8, I will only be able to continue our marathon-style discussion (which I enjoy by the way) on the article (especially on the Aftermath section) next week. Thanks for your patience, Koertefa ( talk) 04:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Octavian! You have not given any reason for yor repeated tagging. You are engaging in edit-warring. I do not know how long this can go on. If you have a problem with my sources why don't you discuss it on the discussion page. I actually liked your having found appropriate quotes from Oltean, but we must stay as close to the original text of these respectable secondary sources as possible, given the delicate nature of the subject. We also must devote more time to doing due diligence on our sources and use only secondary sources from the recent post-Ceausescu years simply because now there is complete freedom of ideas and research in Romania as at respected western universities where for example Oltean works. Eravian ( talk) 11:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Dr.William Faulkner: As I have pointed out many times before publication through a major, respected international news organization such as the BBC or RAI Italian national television is absulutely appropriate and acceptable for Wikipedia. The real important thing though is that the author is an archeologist and the editor of a major archeology journal i.e. Current Archeology. Professor Dr.Livio Zerbini: Same argument as I have described many times before. Publishing through a major international news organization is acceptable and appropriate. Why is it so difficult to understand that the head of the Archeology department of a major university does have high international standing. You may check with the University of Ferrara, Italy, as I have done and find out yourself. He is a nice man. he will answer your E-mail.
Eravian ( talk) 13:57, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, since i am having some unusual problems on this article, i would like you to invite as a neutral party to try to resolve this problem. Thank you. iadrian ( talk) 20:43, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
I have added the NPOV disputed since the article clearly contains only the Hungarian POV. It would be great if you could find some English sources because Romanian/Hungarian are not so reliable about this subject. Greetings. iadrian ( talk) 15:23, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
buna ziua, am vazut pe pagina de discutii de la Khotin Uprising ca detineti surse bune referitoare la aceasta rascoala. daca sunteti dispus pot rescrie eu acest articol. deja am contribuit semnificativ la Tatarbunary Uprising si il voi termina in 1-2 sapt (sper). daca sunteti amabil putem sa colaboram. cu stima. Prometeu ( talk) 17:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
You were mentioned here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#I_would_like_to_report_the_activities_of_some_editors_.E2.80.93_ethnic_abuse_and_edit_warring_from_the_side_of_eastern_european_editors -- Samofi ( talk) 10:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
What do you think about this title above? Would it be suitable for page of Allied Interventions in Hungary? It is a book title. [3] Fakirbakir ( talk) 14:23, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards! |
-- Codrin.B ( talk) 22:20, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards! |
-- Codrin.B ( talk) 15:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
I would gladly participate, within the limits of the available free time. Octavian8 ( talk) 17:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Anonimu and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Codrin.B ( talk) 02:51, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)