Welcome!
Hello, Oakbranch8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --Happy editing! Sincerely,
Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
Tally-ho!
07:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Regarding your comment at the subject article, one should edit boldly and be prepared for a reversion followed by a discussion. It is normal and healthy for edits to be reverted and then discussed (sometimes heatedly); it forces all of us to be as honest and factual as possible, and fosters a Darwinian environment where the best edits survive. I'm no expert, but I like to recommend that everybody read the wikipedia "how to" on references because it helps to let people know where information comes from so that we're on the same page (as it were). TreacherousWays ( talk) 17:57, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. Oakbranch8 ( talk) 04:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Oakbranch8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --Happy editing! Sincerely,
Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
Tally-ho!
07:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Regarding your comment at the subject article, one should edit boldly and be prepared for a reversion followed by a discussion. It is normal and healthy for edits to be reverted and then discussed (sometimes heatedly); it forces all of us to be as honest and factual as possible, and fosters a Darwinian environment where the best edits survive. I'm no expert, but I like to recommend that everybody read the wikipedia "how to" on references because it helps to let people know where information comes from so that we're on the same page (as it were). TreacherousWays ( talk) 17:57, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. Oakbranch8 ( talk) 04:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC)