![]() |
Hi O9837tr7xs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, including your edits to
Master–slave morality, but we cannot accept
original research. Original research also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Valenciano (
talk)
18:27, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Master–slave morality. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Sitethief~
talk to me~
18:34, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
Master–slave morality. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dawn Bard ( talk) 18:36, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Master–slave morality.
Sitethief~
talk to me~
18:39, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Alexf (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Valenciano ( talk) 08:05, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Arctic Kangaroo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks,
Arctic
Kangaroo
08:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Fut.Perf.
☼
17:24, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi O9837tr7xs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, including your edits to
Master–slave morality, but we cannot accept
original research. Original research also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Valenciano (
talk)
18:27, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Master–slave morality. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Sitethief~
talk to me~
18:34, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
Master–slave morality. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dawn Bard ( talk) 18:36, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, as you did with
this edit to
Master–slave morality.
Sitethief~
talk to me~
18:39, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Alexf (talk) 18:45, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Valenciano ( talk) 08:05, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Arctic Kangaroo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks,
Arctic
Kangaroo
08:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Fut.Perf.
☼
17:24, 22 March 2013 (UTC)