![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
How to use talk pages: (guidelines from Template:User talk top)
Archives:
The AfD I nommed was closed as a redirect to Miley Cyrus, not Billy Ray Cyrus. Did I miss a further discussion? -- Dweller ( talk) 15:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Could you block this IP again, his edits today have been really disruptive :-( — Realist 2 20:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
-- NrDg 04:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Can you have a look at this discussion at my talk page? Best regards, -- Kanonkas : Talk 18:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Jonasmiley19 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Alyson19 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are pretty clearly working in tandem.— Kww( talk) 05:09, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Advice needed on this one. I noticed that my redirect on So This Is Love ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) had been undone, so I restored it (the chart information is false, and this song has not charted). The editor undoing my redirect has undone a bunch of other ones:
On the other songs, I gave up, and took them to AFD.
There are two real problems:first, the IP doing this is just CheetahBrian/BrianYau323/FrJonas again. After he was indefinitely blocked, he has just resorted to anonymously sockpuppeting. I'm confident of this because of the IP range and how closely it corresponds to the ranges in [ [1]], and the fact that every one of these articles was very recently edited by one of the named socks. It's a dynamic range, and nearly impossible to block, which leaves the option of semi-protecting the article as a redirect, leaving it open in case someone ever decides to write an article about the 1962 song with this title that did chart. The second problem then arises, that leaves this page as a redirect to a disambiguation page. A straightforward name redirecting to a disambiguation page just feels plain wrong.
One option (and my gut preference) is to move the disambiguation page over this one, and have the disambig page be deleted as unnecessary under CSD-G6. It feels like the right thing to do, but somehow a bit sneaky, even if the only opposition is coming from an indefinitely blocked editor.
Thoughts?— Kww( talk) 20:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Report is here.— Kww( talk) 00:19, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
When I get to this stage with an editor, I like to let an admin or two know just so that I'm not the only one keeping an eye on him. MaxPerry ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has come up to final warning stage on my radar. A quick look at his talk page history shows the problem:
I don't see much hope for productivity here, and it always amazes me how people with warning histories like this can have a clean block log.— Kww( talk) 18:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok thanks. I added the information. What do you think though, could we still add it as we both have proof? I'm just asking your opinion but I'll still wait for other comments though. - Alec2011 ( talk) 22:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
On Selena's discussion page, I mentioned what she said on her SayNow regarding her duet with Demi Lovato. Is there something you want to add there? -- Geekboy6 ( talk) 06:24, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
If you did read her talk page, I just want to know what you think about this info. -- Geekboy6 ( talk) 20:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
My recent changed to the GA article, Brenda Song are very long, but it seems like it may end up getting reverting. It took me a very long time to find the references and expand the Personal Life section and to re-organize the lead\intro. But the changes may dissappiont many lead amdins and get reverted so I am wondering what are your opinions on the changed. This is very important to me because I spend a very long time working on thid to make it viewable and perfect. I added a Mochi Magazine reference and some sentences about Song's early life which may be triviac and removed. I just want to know what are your thoughts and how I can improve it. I can't edit locked pages yet, such as Emma Watson. Here is the revision page for Brenda Song: [2] I added new sentences and references to the personal life section too. Thank you and I well really appreciate hearing your comments. I am very afraid and worried, that it may get reverted, fully revert. Thanks. -- ThyCantabrigde 12:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much. -- ThyCantabrigde 12:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
With the current contributions would it be worth me applying for Rollback? I have Huggle, but cant use it until rollback is enabled on my account. Thanks -- Frankie0607 ( talk) 01:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
NrDg Im really sorry,I hope you will grant me an acccount please, This is gerald gonzalez. 203.177.247.127 ( talk) 06:15, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Would you kindly take a look at [3]. Gimmetrow 22:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Album cover for Hannah Montana Hits Remixed.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 16:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I think that it's official that the Disney/Pixar Part of the forum isn't counted as a source for future episodes, even though the information is from Disney. I've tried and it's time for me to stop. I know that I can't change the rules or prove anything since I'm not an editor so I can't really put in my point. Thanks for the help, I'll just have to wait till a TV Guide website posts the episodes. But can I ask you a question. If I can get Burgendy Ranger to open a website and have him post the iinformation there, can that count as the official source? If not I guess I'm out of ideas. But having future episodes is important to me and I know that vandalism can happen, and I know that I've been helping keeping it down so future episodes can be posted if a reliable source is posted. Thanks, and please reply. - Alec2011 ( talk) 04:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Why did Walt Disney not launch a soundtrack for the Hannah Montana's third season? Do you know at least one reason for that? 201.16.200.201 ( talk) 17:06, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Just wantedto stop by and say hello, and also ask a favor. Can you please keep an eye on User talk:69.112.43.77? Their block is over and they're continuing to disrupt The Cleveland Show page with edits which are again the current sources. Thanks and happy editing. -- H E L LØ Ŧ H E R E 20:06, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Singles/Songs? Do you really think that we should put Breakout's article? Britney's Radar is a charted song and have a great history, and not for all that was placed in her template. I think that this template is not good with this section, I don't know, make it unprofessional. Renanx3 ( talk) 16:00, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
How to use talk pages: (guidelines from Template:User talk top)
Archives:
The AfD I nommed was closed as a redirect to Miley Cyrus, not Billy Ray Cyrus. Did I miss a further discussion? -- Dweller ( talk) 15:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Could you block this IP again, his edits today have been really disruptive :-( — Realist 2 20:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
-- NrDg 04:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Can you have a look at this discussion at my talk page? Best regards, -- Kanonkas : Talk 18:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Jonasmiley19 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Alyson19 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are pretty clearly working in tandem.— Kww( talk) 05:09, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Advice needed on this one. I noticed that my redirect on So This Is Love ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) had been undone, so I restored it (the chart information is false, and this song has not charted). The editor undoing my redirect has undone a bunch of other ones:
On the other songs, I gave up, and took them to AFD.
There are two real problems:first, the IP doing this is just CheetahBrian/BrianYau323/FrJonas again. After he was indefinitely blocked, he has just resorted to anonymously sockpuppeting. I'm confident of this because of the IP range and how closely it corresponds to the ranges in [ [1]], and the fact that every one of these articles was very recently edited by one of the named socks. It's a dynamic range, and nearly impossible to block, which leaves the option of semi-protecting the article as a redirect, leaving it open in case someone ever decides to write an article about the 1962 song with this title that did chart. The second problem then arises, that leaves this page as a redirect to a disambiguation page. A straightforward name redirecting to a disambiguation page just feels plain wrong.
One option (and my gut preference) is to move the disambiguation page over this one, and have the disambig page be deleted as unnecessary under CSD-G6. It feels like the right thing to do, but somehow a bit sneaky, even if the only opposition is coming from an indefinitely blocked editor.
Thoughts?— Kww( talk) 20:26, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Report is here.— Kww( talk) 00:19, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
When I get to this stage with an editor, I like to let an admin or two know just so that I'm not the only one keeping an eye on him. MaxPerry ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has come up to final warning stage on my radar. A quick look at his talk page history shows the problem:
I don't see much hope for productivity here, and it always amazes me how people with warning histories like this can have a clean block log.— Kww( talk) 18:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok thanks. I added the information. What do you think though, could we still add it as we both have proof? I'm just asking your opinion but I'll still wait for other comments though. - Alec2011 ( talk) 22:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
On Selena's discussion page, I mentioned what she said on her SayNow regarding her duet with Demi Lovato. Is there something you want to add there? -- Geekboy6 ( talk) 06:24, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
If you did read her talk page, I just want to know what you think about this info. -- Geekboy6 ( talk) 20:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
My recent changed to the GA article, Brenda Song are very long, but it seems like it may end up getting reverting. It took me a very long time to find the references and expand the Personal Life section and to re-organize the lead\intro. But the changes may dissappiont many lead amdins and get reverted so I am wondering what are your opinions on the changed. This is very important to me because I spend a very long time working on thid to make it viewable and perfect. I added a Mochi Magazine reference and some sentences about Song's early life which may be triviac and removed. I just want to know what are your thoughts and how I can improve it. I can't edit locked pages yet, such as Emma Watson. Here is the revision page for Brenda Song: [2] I added new sentences and references to the personal life section too. Thank you and I well really appreciate hearing your comments. I am very afraid and worried, that it may get reverted, fully revert. Thanks. -- ThyCantabrigde 12:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much. -- ThyCantabrigde 12:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
With the current contributions would it be worth me applying for Rollback? I have Huggle, but cant use it until rollback is enabled on my account. Thanks -- Frankie0607 ( talk) 01:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
NrDg Im really sorry,I hope you will grant me an acccount please, This is gerald gonzalez. 203.177.247.127 ( talk) 06:15, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Would you kindly take a look at [3]. Gimmetrow 22:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Album cover for Hannah Montana Hits Remixed.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 16:42, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I think that it's official that the Disney/Pixar Part of the forum isn't counted as a source for future episodes, even though the information is from Disney. I've tried and it's time for me to stop. I know that I can't change the rules or prove anything since I'm not an editor so I can't really put in my point. Thanks for the help, I'll just have to wait till a TV Guide website posts the episodes. But can I ask you a question. If I can get Burgendy Ranger to open a website and have him post the iinformation there, can that count as the official source? If not I guess I'm out of ideas. But having future episodes is important to me and I know that vandalism can happen, and I know that I've been helping keeping it down so future episodes can be posted if a reliable source is posted. Thanks, and please reply. - Alec2011 ( talk) 04:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Why did Walt Disney not launch a soundtrack for the Hannah Montana's third season? Do you know at least one reason for that? 201.16.200.201 ( talk) 17:06, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Just wantedto stop by and say hello, and also ask a favor. Can you please keep an eye on User talk:69.112.43.77? Their block is over and they're continuing to disrupt The Cleveland Show page with edits which are again the current sources. Thanks and happy editing. -- H E L LØ Ŧ H E R E 20:06, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Singles/Songs? Do you really think that we should put Breakout's article? Britney's Radar is a charted song and have a great history, and not for all that was placed in her template. I think that this template is not good with this section, I don't know, make it unprofessional. Renanx3 ( talk) 16:00, 31 December 2008 (UTC)