![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
How to use talk pages: (guidelines from Template:User talk top)
Archives: 070625- 070920- 071102- 071231- 080131- 080229- 080331- 080429
He created two new socks: User:LykaRaymundo and User:Carpioeje. Both users have the same editing pattern (All edited articles are about Angel Locsin and its related articles. Please check out LykaRaymundo's contributions and Carpioeje's contributions for evidences. Thanks! - Danngarcia ( talk)
Actually, the original source only linked to one of the court documents. I posted the second source because it included all of the legal documents. Mike126beatles ( talk) 17:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the hannah Montana vandalizer. Mooncrest ( talk) 20:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight ( talk) 17:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello NrDg, how've you been. Theres' this one user that keeps irritating me by putting "The Way We Almost Weren't" in the season two area, when there is clearly a section stating it belongs in future episodes. What to do?- Yours truly, [ S ] υ ρ є r ı o r reply! 20:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey there... After a dozen warnings, this fanboy named User:Gerald Gonzalez, the same user that I'm talking about earlier, is now harassing me by sending hate speech at me via YouTube. You told me he's annoying but not malicious, but it seems as though he's now resorting to being against WP:CIVIL, saying the f-word at me if I request full protection of Angel Locsin's article. I tried blocking him from sending messages to me, but still he's flaming at me. Can you notify him about this? Please??? God Bless and have a nice day, sir...
P.S.: Here's the original message, with profanity asterisked out:
May 03, 2008
f*** you you are *** dont let request Angel Locsin's page to be fully protected because i will kill you. **** YOU So much....your a gay...... hahaha....... uve reported me to NrDg in Wikipedia **** you..... Gay.,....
Blake Gripling ( talk) 10:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Was moved to Talk:Brenda_Song#Brenda_Song.27s_salary
Hey! Miley started her official myspace and i think we should put it on and add it. Katicab2 ( talk) 19:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Katicab2
That's her music myspace. She has a Personal one. and it's true. User talk:Katicab2 —Preceding comment was added at 15:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey, NrDg. Just a reminder that email should not be disabled as a default when blocking accounts. Per the blocking policy, email should only be disabled in response to abuse of the email function. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 20:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
You might want to look at the history of your talk page. There's been a temper tantrum. Kww ( talk) 01:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your excellent work reverting vandalism on
The Walt Disney Company.
Tiggerjay (
talk)
01:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
You think you're smart? Well, you are not smart. In fact, I bet your intelligence is zero. Are you this good at pissing people off or what? DemiLovato15 ( talk) 02:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I earlyer made a page about an organisation, Renfrewshire Youth Voice and it was destroyed under these terms: (A7 (group): Group/band/club/company/etc; doesn't indicate importance/significance)
May i ask you to look at the article i have re-written and tell me if you beleve it is now suitable?
The article is on my user page. KrizzyB ( talk) 22:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry - managed to miss that. User's unblocked, userpage and talk page cleared up. Good catch. GB T/ C 17:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, NrDg. I undo the article of Marian Rivera because I identified as vandalism. Please, block the IP address 121.97.109.76 temporarily. THANKS!!! Unknownquinones ( talk) 12:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Help, NrDg, I have another report, please block also the IP address 90.201.215.118 because of VANDALISM!!! THANKS!!! Unknownquinones ( talk) 13:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey NrDg I was wondering if you could coach me, like WP:ADMINCOACH just I'm not trying for a adminship at the moment. I need to get better in some areas. Would be nice if you could accept, or at least consider it. Thanks. -- Kanonkas : Take Contact 16:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Why did you revert my clarification that she is African American? It seems typical at WP to mention the heritage of minority actors and others. I thought that it was peculiar that the fact was ommitted here, while another actress in this series is described as Phillipino America. Is there a reason? Thanks! -- Kevin Murray ( talk) 21:17, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
There was also information from an unreliable reference in the edit as well about a relative in the edit I reverted. Generally the lead section of a bio article contains the nationality of the person. She is American so that should be mentioned. African-American is a racial classification, not a nationality, and IMHO does not need to be in the lead section as it is not important, for this particular person, as to why she is notable. Also African- American should be wikilinked as African-American. It is compound noun or noun phase and the separate parts should not be separately linked. The definition of African American as shown in its article included residents as well as American nationals of African descent and thus is not a specific nationality indicator. Saying American of African descent would be better phrasing if it were to be included. I have no objection to including religion, race or ethnicity in articles as long as the info is properly sourced as per WP:BLP -- NrDg 00:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I think you may want to check the articles that this rogue user has contributed to, especially Carolco Pictures and related. Some of his edits have been mixed with good faith edits and have gone undetected, and a movie article he created may be a hoax(it may get caught by another before you read this). Just thought I give you a heads up since you suspect he may have 2 IP socks... Ranma9617 ( talk) 06:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Ive successfully removed this image [1] in the article. Ive just only added some statement about the said teleserye. SBTVCAL 06:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Just look at the history, I mean they're changing the dates from June, May, July all over it and that's not all, the singles also get added without any reliable sources. Could you please protect it? I could go to WP:RFPP but you're the expert here. Best regards, -- Kanonkas : Take Contact 21:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for understanding because of your good advices, from now on I will be more literate person. Sorry again for everything. I hope you will trust me. Sorry for so many inconvenience to you. I understand you. Again thankyou! Your my inspiration! Please consider my edits because im here in wikipedia to help certain things that matters and i cant quit doing this because this had already been my habit. Thankyou!! SBTVCAL ( talk) 11:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't think this has been a notable enough controversy to include in the article, but it is funny. Kww ( talk) 13:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for all the wrong doings I've done. I'm so embarrased. I Just want to ask permission to you because i want to edit Angel Locsin's page, i just want to help the page better. Thankyou. Anyway i want to upload free image of Angel Locsin and put it in the article. Also i want to remove the (2) templates on the top of the article, I think those templates are not necessary to include in the article. Again thankyou for the advices. I hope you will not give up in advicing my wrong doings. Thankyou a lot. SBTVCAL ( talk) 01:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello my account SBTVCAL was blocked by User:Spellcast (Talk) Please help me to be able to edit pages again. Please! I Will never create another account again promise just let this account SBTVCAL free on editing. Carisilm2004 ( talk) 06:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi NrDg, you seem to be familiar with user:Aiza00 and his socks. There's been long term disruption from this person. Perhaps another checkuser report can be filed here? Spellcast ( talk) 19:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
I think Brenda Song can be unprotected now. Gimmetrow 20:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, NrDg, please warn or block SBTVCAL and Ginacarmen again because of sock puppet of those two of them and creating multiple accounts. But I found in YouTube named NassJamesGoodLooking that vandalize Marian Rivera and also me. THANKS!!! Unknownquinones ( talk) 12:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, NrDg, that sock puppetry case creates multiple accounts. The names are: user:Carisilm2004, user:Ginacarmen, user:Gerald Gonzalez, user:Aiza00, user:SBTVCAL, and User:Tomsbrand™. That user also vandalizes Marian Rivera. Please, help me edit those users and must all users that I given are sock puppet. THANKS!!! Unknownquinones ( talk) 02:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
The article was filled with fake references and fake positons the editor who did that was blocked for not responding to edits and submitting fake references and text even soemtimes the user who is by the way dienaked, reverted and posted non free images not to mention reverting most of the brenda song article and posting more fake references. In that result dienaked was blocked. That user received several warnings about that article. I have discussed this with other admins and that resulted to a block towards dienaked. And now fans are reverting the edits because they think it is not fair. Well hiw about reveiving the article first. It took me 2 hours for reveiving and over 30 mintutes for removing false references and fake chart postions not too mention 3 kiloybytes of trivia and fake sales. Most of the references were from fansites or forums which is not exceptable. Dienaked was blocked in that result. I am not a Brenda Song fan that is categorizing a trusted user as a strategy. Fotesh is now accusing me of being a vandellism user, he or she does not know why and seems to stick to the conspiracy theories made by Dienaked. I doubt that Dienaked is not connected with Fotesh. I have warned several admins on wikipedia about this and after that they blocked Dienaked. I have removed the text that was trivia, fake or fan based from the article with reasons given in the history page while Fotesh just reverting my edit with no reasons and started accusing me of being a crazy brenda song fan rekated with some ip address when my real ip is 81.155.226.185 and here is proof. [5]
Have you even considered looking at the references posted in the old revision. They were all forums and fansites, and some of them were in different languages i translated the brazil newspaper it does not even mention headstrong's sales. They are fake and the user was blocked. Some of the text was just downright fake claiming that the album sold over 1 million and adding a fansite reference as a source. And then adding a billboard best album award reference. And the international sales links were forums in some areas and they did not even mention the album's sales/ And in soem cases we had refereneces that did not say anything about the album or included any thing about it. Dienaked though he could get away with posting fake references. And the critical reception was very fan based. Some of the reviews were made by fans and had several typos and they were not referenced and that is why we removed them and then we had about two referneced that stayed. I doubt that this user isnt Dienaked sinc ethe spelling errors, timing and opinions are exaclty the same. IntoCreativeJan ( talk) 08:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
There's a mess over at Headstrong (album), and it started spilling onto my talk page (probably because of my vandalism reversions). IntoCreativeJan seems to have put his side of the fight on your page, both sides are over on mine. I've got my hands full these days trying to keep arbcom from topic banning me from all articles related to artistic works, so I'm not going to wade into this. Kww ( talk) 13:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Your you speak of placing infomarción fake but if seizure to write things of your Brenda you place information of false charts of other artitas ... please your only act for envy ... you eat in the life have worried about this article and now because my brother erased these false charts that your you placed in brenda's page, you entered the contributions of to erase only because you did not support that he was erasing anything of your Brenda. you are a very slightly objective person. Fotesh ( talk) 10:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
I did not erease the history dates they were repeated in a seperate sections, the teplate has broken links and had other songs which was not needed and that image was exactly the same target is not a internation publication or country which made is very illusive and your brothers edits were vandellism and i did not place anything ob brenda's that style was not ahsley's style it was a worlwide template style not by your brother. And discussion is over. If you revert my edits again, it may lead to another block. I have discussed this with other admins. the discussion is over revetring my work will be vandellism and would result to a block. THis is your final warning. IntoCreativeJan ( talk) 3:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry if I posted at the wrong section, but these users User:167.128.156.40, User:65.37.50.185, which I think is coming from a single person or group (based on their editing style and/or pattern), are being warned several times for vandalizing pages such as Strawberry Shortcake, VeggieTales and other related articles. They have been blocked a couple of times but they haven't learned from their mistakes and is still monkeying around... Any thoughts on this? God Bless and have a nice day... Blake Gripling ( talk) 01:22, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
How to use talk pages: (guidelines from Template:User talk top)
Archives: 070625- 070920- 071102- 071231- 080131- 080229- 080331- 080429
He created two new socks: User:LykaRaymundo and User:Carpioeje. Both users have the same editing pattern (All edited articles are about Angel Locsin and its related articles. Please check out LykaRaymundo's contributions and Carpioeje's contributions for evidences. Thanks! - Danngarcia ( talk)
Actually, the original source only linked to one of the court documents. I posted the second source because it included all of the legal documents. Mike126beatles ( talk) 17:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the hannah Montana vandalizer. Mooncrest ( talk) 20:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight ( talk) 17:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello NrDg, how've you been. Theres' this one user that keeps irritating me by putting "The Way We Almost Weren't" in the season two area, when there is clearly a section stating it belongs in future episodes. What to do?- Yours truly, [ S ] υ ρ є r ı o r reply! 20:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey there... After a dozen warnings, this fanboy named User:Gerald Gonzalez, the same user that I'm talking about earlier, is now harassing me by sending hate speech at me via YouTube. You told me he's annoying but not malicious, but it seems as though he's now resorting to being against WP:CIVIL, saying the f-word at me if I request full protection of Angel Locsin's article. I tried blocking him from sending messages to me, but still he's flaming at me. Can you notify him about this? Please??? God Bless and have a nice day, sir...
P.S.: Here's the original message, with profanity asterisked out:
May 03, 2008
f*** you you are *** dont let request Angel Locsin's page to be fully protected because i will kill you. **** YOU So much....your a gay...... hahaha....... uve reported me to NrDg in Wikipedia **** you..... Gay.,....
Blake Gripling ( talk) 10:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Was moved to Talk:Brenda_Song#Brenda_Song.27s_salary
Hey! Miley started her official myspace and i think we should put it on and add it. Katicab2 ( talk) 19:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Katicab2
That's her music myspace. She has a Personal one. and it's true. User talk:Katicab2 —Preceding comment was added at 15:14, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey, NrDg. Just a reminder that email should not be disabled as a default when blocking accounts. Per the blocking policy, email should only be disabled in response to abuse of the email function. Thanks, - auburnpilot talk 20:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
You might want to look at the history of your talk page. There's been a temper tantrum. Kww ( talk) 01:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your excellent work reverting vandalism on
The Walt Disney Company.
Tiggerjay (
talk)
01:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
You think you're smart? Well, you are not smart. In fact, I bet your intelligence is zero. Are you this good at pissing people off or what? DemiLovato15 ( talk) 02:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I earlyer made a page about an organisation, Renfrewshire Youth Voice and it was destroyed under these terms: (A7 (group): Group/band/club/company/etc; doesn't indicate importance/significance)
May i ask you to look at the article i have re-written and tell me if you beleve it is now suitable?
The article is on my user page. KrizzyB ( talk) 22:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry - managed to miss that. User's unblocked, userpage and talk page cleared up. Good catch. GB T/ C 17:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, NrDg. I undo the article of Marian Rivera because I identified as vandalism. Please, block the IP address 121.97.109.76 temporarily. THANKS!!! Unknownquinones ( talk) 12:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Help, NrDg, I have another report, please block also the IP address 90.201.215.118 because of VANDALISM!!! THANKS!!! Unknownquinones ( talk) 13:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey NrDg I was wondering if you could coach me, like WP:ADMINCOACH just I'm not trying for a adminship at the moment. I need to get better in some areas. Would be nice if you could accept, or at least consider it. Thanks. -- Kanonkas : Take Contact 16:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Why did you revert my clarification that she is African American? It seems typical at WP to mention the heritage of minority actors and others. I thought that it was peculiar that the fact was ommitted here, while another actress in this series is described as Phillipino America. Is there a reason? Thanks! -- Kevin Murray ( talk) 21:17, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
There was also information from an unreliable reference in the edit as well about a relative in the edit I reverted. Generally the lead section of a bio article contains the nationality of the person. She is American so that should be mentioned. African-American is a racial classification, not a nationality, and IMHO does not need to be in the lead section as it is not important, for this particular person, as to why she is notable. Also African- American should be wikilinked as African-American. It is compound noun or noun phase and the separate parts should not be separately linked. The definition of African American as shown in its article included residents as well as American nationals of African descent and thus is not a specific nationality indicator. Saying American of African descent would be better phrasing if it were to be included. I have no objection to including religion, race or ethnicity in articles as long as the info is properly sourced as per WP:BLP -- NrDg 00:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I think you may want to check the articles that this rogue user has contributed to, especially Carolco Pictures and related. Some of his edits have been mixed with good faith edits and have gone undetected, and a movie article he created may be a hoax(it may get caught by another before you read this). Just thought I give you a heads up since you suspect he may have 2 IP socks... Ranma9617 ( talk) 06:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Ive successfully removed this image [1] in the article. Ive just only added some statement about the said teleserye. SBTVCAL 06:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Just look at the history, I mean they're changing the dates from June, May, July all over it and that's not all, the singles also get added without any reliable sources. Could you please protect it? I could go to WP:RFPP but you're the expert here. Best regards, -- Kanonkas : Take Contact 21:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for understanding because of your good advices, from now on I will be more literate person. Sorry again for everything. I hope you will trust me. Sorry for so many inconvenience to you. I understand you. Again thankyou! Your my inspiration! Please consider my edits because im here in wikipedia to help certain things that matters and i cant quit doing this because this had already been my habit. Thankyou!! SBTVCAL ( talk) 11:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't think this has been a notable enough controversy to include in the article, but it is funny. Kww ( talk) 13:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for all the wrong doings I've done. I'm so embarrased. I Just want to ask permission to you because i want to edit Angel Locsin's page, i just want to help the page better. Thankyou. Anyway i want to upload free image of Angel Locsin and put it in the article. Also i want to remove the (2) templates on the top of the article, I think those templates are not necessary to include in the article. Again thankyou for the advices. I hope you will not give up in advicing my wrong doings. Thankyou a lot. SBTVCAL ( talk) 01:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello my account SBTVCAL was blocked by User:Spellcast (Talk) Please help me to be able to edit pages again. Please! I Will never create another account again promise just let this account SBTVCAL free on editing. Carisilm2004 ( talk) 06:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi NrDg, you seem to be familiar with user:Aiza00 and his socks. There's been long term disruption from this person. Perhaps another checkuser report can be filed here? Spellcast ( talk) 19:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
I think Brenda Song can be unprotected now. Gimmetrow 20:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, NrDg, please warn or block SBTVCAL and Ginacarmen again because of sock puppet of those two of them and creating multiple accounts. But I found in YouTube named NassJamesGoodLooking that vandalize Marian Rivera and also me. THANKS!!! Unknownquinones ( talk) 12:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, NrDg, that sock puppetry case creates multiple accounts. The names are: user:Carisilm2004, user:Ginacarmen, user:Gerald Gonzalez, user:Aiza00, user:SBTVCAL, and User:Tomsbrand™. That user also vandalizes Marian Rivera. Please, help me edit those users and must all users that I given are sock puppet. THANKS!!! Unknownquinones ( talk) 02:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
The article was filled with fake references and fake positons the editor who did that was blocked for not responding to edits and submitting fake references and text even soemtimes the user who is by the way dienaked, reverted and posted non free images not to mention reverting most of the brenda song article and posting more fake references. In that result dienaked was blocked. That user received several warnings about that article. I have discussed this with other admins and that resulted to a block towards dienaked. And now fans are reverting the edits because they think it is not fair. Well hiw about reveiving the article first. It took me 2 hours for reveiving and over 30 mintutes for removing false references and fake chart postions not too mention 3 kiloybytes of trivia and fake sales. Most of the references were from fansites or forums which is not exceptable. Dienaked was blocked in that result. I am not a Brenda Song fan that is categorizing a trusted user as a strategy. Fotesh is now accusing me of being a vandellism user, he or she does not know why and seems to stick to the conspiracy theories made by Dienaked. I doubt that Dienaked is not connected with Fotesh. I have warned several admins on wikipedia about this and after that they blocked Dienaked. I have removed the text that was trivia, fake or fan based from the article with reasons given in the history page while Fotesh just reverting my edit with no reasons and started accusing me of being a crazy brenda song fan rekated with some ip address when my real ip is 81.155.226.185 and here is proof. [5]
Have you even considered looking at the references posted in the old revision. They were all forums and fansites, and some of them were in different languages i translated the brazil newspaper it does not even mention headstrong's sales. They are fake and the user was blocked. Some of the text was just downright fake claiming that the album sold over 1 million and adding a fansite reference as a source. And then adding a billboard best album award reference. And the international sales links were forums in some areas and they did not even mention the album's sales/ And in soem cases we had refereneces that did not say anything about the album or included any thing about it. Dienaked though he could get away with posting fake references. And the critical reception was very fan based. Some of the reviews were made by fans and had several typos and they were not referenced and that is why we removed them and then we had about two referneced that stayed. I doubt that this user isnt Dienaked sinc ethe spelling errors, timing and opinions are exaclty the same. IntoCreativeJan ( talk) 08:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
There's a mess over at Headstrong (album), and it started spilling onto my talk page (probably because of my vandalism reversions). IntoCreativeJan seems to have put his side of the fight on your page, both sides are over on mine. I've got my hands full these days trying to keep arbcom from topic banning me from all articles related to artistic works, so I'm not going to wade into this. Kww ( talk) 13:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Your you speak of placing infomarción fake but if seizure to write things of your Brenda you place information of false charts of other artitas ... please your only act for envy ... you eat in the life have worried about this article and now because my brother erased these false charts that your you placed in brenda's page, you entered the contributions of to erase only because you did not support that he was erasing anything of your Brenda. you are a very slightly objective person. Fotesh ( talk) 10:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
I did not erease the history dates they were repeated in a seperate sections, the teplate has broken links and had other songs which was not needed and that image was exactly the same target is not a internation publication or country which made is very illusive and your brothers edits were vandellism and i did not place anything ob brenda's that style was not ahsley's style it was a worlwide template style not by your brother. And discussion is over. If you revert my edits again, it may lead to another block. I have discussed this with other admins. the discussion is over revetring my work will be vandellism and would result to a block. THis is your final warning. IntoCreativeJan ( talk) 3:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry if I posted at the wrong section, but these users User:167.128.156.40, User:65.37.50.185, which I think is coming from a single person or group (based on their editing style and/or pattern), are being warned several times for vandalizing pages such as Strawberry Shortcake, VeggieTales and other related articles. They have been blocked a couple of times but they haven't learned from their mistakes and is still monkeying around... Any thoughts on this? God Bless and have a nice day... Blake Gripling ( talk) 01:22, 30 May 2008 (UTC)