This is in regard to your edit here. Please avoid using abusive edit summaries as per Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Thanks and happy editing. -- Masamage 01:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Umm...are you sure you have the right person? I never made major edits to any of the 12 oz. mouse article. Only small, insignificant ones, and those where all spelled correctly. BishopTutu 17:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Haha, sorry about that whole "sic" thing. I did look it up, but i misinterpreted the definition. Yeah, it doesn't belong there. BishopTutu 22:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
That header specifically says 'See the talk page for details.', and yet, there are no details on the talk page. Perhaps you want to use a different header? MGlosenger 16:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
"Although Roostre sometimes seems to know the full extent of what's going on, he did not know who Liquor and the Dark Figure were, nor did he know what Liquor meant by "restarting everything" and "setting the alarm". This may indicate that he wasn't very high ranked in Q-109, that it's simply the result of him losing part of his memory, or that The Clock and those under him (Shark, Square guy, ect.) aren't part of Q-109."
I was pretty clear on the personal attack committed against Tom Chaplin and people who like Keane (there's where I'm included), as is textually refered on The Mekon's user page. I cited that to an administrator and unfairly blocked me. I won't retire the comment as The Mekon has been offending Keane a long time ago and now returned under ErleGrey nickname as referred by himself on my talk page. Thanks for letting me know this. I will post a link to my Nahuatl Wikipedia user page where I'll dedicate a paragraph to this guy...-- Fluence 00:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
“ | There's not much I can say about your above work, other than that you are obviously not a sane person | ” |
. This is a personal attack against me, in your own talk page. If you're sooo sure ErleGrey is not The Mekon, is because you may be in accordance with him only to fuck on Keane. About the samples, five of them are being currently used on Keane's article so that wouldn't disqualifie for fair use, completely licensed. If they're deleted, I'll upload them again, or much simpler, upload them to the Nahuatl Wikipedia and make a link.-- Fluence 01:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Main Page, you will be blocked from editing. -- lucasbfr talk 10:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Dweller 10:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I changed the image back to the earlier one, the one that you uploaded, seeing as the version the other user uploaded wasn't being used anywhere else.
It is now back to the original photograph of David Dickinson. -- Dreaded Walrus t c 23:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
No vandalism to dogwood please. Thanks, dude. ask123 04:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
This is in regard to your edit here. Please avoid using abusive edit summaries as per Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Thanks and happy editing. -- Masamage 01:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Umm...are you sure you have the right person? I never made major edits to any of the 12 oz. mouse article. Only small, insignificant ones, and those where all spelled correctly. BishopTutu 17:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Haha, sorry about that whole "sic" thing. I did look it up, but i misinterpreted the definition. Yeah, it doesn't belong there. BishopTutu 22:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
That header specifically says 'See the talk page for details.', and yet, there are no details on the talk page. Perhaps you want to use a different header? MGlosenger 16:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
"Although Roostre sometimes seems to know the full extent of what's going on, he did not know who Liquor and the Dark Figure were, nor did he know what Liquor meant by "restarting everything" and "setting the alarm". This may indicate that he wasn't very high ranked in Q-109, that it's simply the result of him losing part of his memory, or that The Clock and those under him (Shark, Square guy, ect.) aren't part of Q-109."
I was pretty clear on the personal attack committed against Tom Chaplin and people who like Keane (there's where I'm included), as is textually refered on The Mekon's user page. I cited that to an administrator and unfairly blocked me. I won't retire the comment as The Mekon has been offending Keane a long time ago and now returned under ErleGrey nickname as referred by himself on my talk page. Thanks for letting me know this. I will post a link to my Nahuatl Wikipedia user page where I'll dedicate a paragraph to this guy...-- Fluence 00:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
“ | There's not much I can say about your above work, other than that you are obviously not a sane person | ” |
. This is a personal attack against me, in your own talk page. If you're sooo sure ErleGrey is not The Mekon, is because you may be in accordance with him only to fuck on Keane. About the samples, five of them are being currently used on Keane's article so that wouldn't disqualifie for fair use, completely licensed. If they're deleted, I'll upload them again, or much simpler, upload them to the Nahuatl Wikipedia and make a link.-- Fluence 01:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Main Page, you will be blocked from editing. -- lucasbfr talk 10:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Dweller 10:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I changed the image back to the earlier one, the one that you uploaded, seeing as the version the other user uploaded wasn't being used anywhere else.
It is now back to the original photograph of David Dickinson. -- Dreaded Walrus t c 23:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
No vandalism to dogwood please. Thanks, dude. ask123 04:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)