Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Newcastle, New South Wales, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist ( talk) 07:31, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, are you talking about for the Marching Koalas? I included a news article with them in it. Would their website suffice (i.e. http://marchingkoalas.org.au/home-new/)? Sorry, am still learning about Wikipedia editing NovoKristy578 ( talk) 07:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Badger International, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MaxnaCarta ( talk) 03:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you for letting me know. Is it the $20billion in risk items mention (that I see has a 'citation needed' message) that needs a reliable source? I can't find any online source for that so should I remove that particular company fact to clean up the page? And are there any references that should be removed and therefore that part of the company history removed too (e.g. the first reference - for PR Newswire)? I thought I sourced the most reliable references available online. I would love some further guidance if you have time. NovoKristy578 ( talk) 10:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Badger International. Thanks! LittlePuppers ( talk) 18:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Badger International and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples ( talk) 02:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, NovoKristy578! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples ( talk) 02:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, NovoKristy578. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Badger International".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 23:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC) reply