![]() |
Hi Notimelivelong! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 23:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC) |
I deleted the section as no other city in the region has such a section. The city is mentioned in many works of the classics of Russian literature - Pushkin, Lermontov, Tolstoy, Bulgakov, etc. But in this section there is a specific novel that was recently published to me personally by a not known writer. This is just an attempt to promote it via Wikipedia. This is an advertisement.-- DarqaviPalladin ( talk) 23:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Calling a veteran editor a vandal, like you implied in this revert, is a good way to get that editor pissed at you. In addition, if information is not in the source, then don't write it as though it were! Debresser ( talk) 13:47, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
You messaged me some days ago telling me my edits have been reverted because my edit summaries weren't clear, I tried to justify by stating that that a user named Trivialist were doing the same edits by citing WP:CRYSTAL. Recently they have started again to remove the section of films in development (after having that section reverted by other users) so I wanted to see if their justification was valid to remove that section or if that they were doing goes aganist editing guidelines. - Gouleg ( Talk • Contribs) 17:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Please stop blanking the anon's talk page. Per
WP:BLANKING: Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered, from removing comments from their own talk pages...If a user removes material from their user page, it is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents. There is no need to keep them on display, and usually users should not be forced to do so
. Cheers,
——
SerialNumber
54129
18:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
PS: welcome to Wikipedia. —— SerialNumber 54129 18:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Not sure what you're up to, but creating PleaseFeckOff ( talk · contribs), DontBlockMeOrElseYouDie ( talk · contribs), and YesTimeLiveL0ng ( talk · contribs) was a bad idea. I'm guessing this is some kind of good hand/bad hand thing where you create obviously inappropriate accounts, report them with your "good" account, and ask for advanced permissions. If I'm wrong, you can appeal the block and give your explanation. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 20:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Notimelivelong ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I never created those accounts! I would never, and I mean EVER, make accounts so that I can report them. I never even filed a report against those accounts or even warned them once. If you look at my contribution history, you will see that all of my reverts are genuine. I spent my own personal time to help prevent vandalism, having fun while doing so, and then getting blocked for accounts I have never created. I have to note that on Thursday (April 4th) and Friday (April 5th), I used my schools internet for vandalism patrolling. I think this may be related to those accounts. The YesTimeLiveL0ng account is possibly related to one of my friends, since he knows about my account and possibly made it to vandalise my user page. Additionally, I have not yet requested for any permissions! I joined Wikipedia around six days ago, and currently, I don't have any reason to request for it. The only thing that I would request for is rollback, so I can use huggle to its fullest extent, but I don't think I can anymore since this block with be tied to my account for as long as Wikipedia exists. This really upsets that I am treated like a person that would actually try to destroy this site. It will also be harder for people to trust me now since I have a block logged on me. Additionally, it is even more upsetting that I am blocked INDEFINETLY, meaning I have the possibility of having this unblock request denied, and I will no longer be able to contribute to this site in my life. Many people even thanked my reverts, even though I am just new to Wikipedia. I even have 400 edits just within a short amount of time of me being part of Wikipedia. Some people did question me for a couple of small mistakes I have made, but they forgave me. Now, I honestly do not know how you tied those accounts to me, but I can assure you that I do not have ill intentions. I can guarantee you that I have not made those accounts and that I will never, ever, ever, EVER, as long as I live, do anything that malicious to ANYTHING. Also, if I DID want to do this, I would make sure that my IP is separated from those accounts. So please clear me from wrong doing. This is just upsetting that I have been practically banned for life from making further contributions for something I never done. These are possibly the last words I will type in a talk page, so please make a very careful decision. Thank for reading, and possibly, goodbye... Notimelivelong ( talk) 00:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser relies on more than just IP addresses. I have also run a checkuser on this account, and I concur with the blocking administrator; the relationship between this account and the named sockpuppets is pretty cut-and-dried. Yunshui 雲 水 07:39, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Notimelivelong ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Alright, I just talked to my friend about this situation. Here's what happened. I got into the library and signed on to Wikipedia. I then started to do my usual thing, patrolling the edit page. Then my two friends walk in and sit down next to me. My friend Anthony sat next to me and my friend Jason (the one who created the accounts) sat down next to Anthony. I started to stop and talk to Anthony and Jason started to make those accounts. Then, Jason asked me what my username was. I told him, and I am guessing he wanted to know to copy my username. I lied to him and I said "YesTimeLiveLong" and then he replaced the "o" with a "0". He then vandalized the Prospect High School website, and told me to look at it, so I did. I then saw the edits that was created and I asked him if he did this, and guess what he said. Times up, he said no. I then reverted the page, and right after I reverted the page, the resource officer walked up behind us and asked what we where doing. He then seperated us and asked me what I was doing. I just said that I was looking at the recent edits on Wikipedia so I can spot vandalism. Then he went to my friend Jason and asked him, and took him to the deens. Next period, the deen came to my classroom and brought me out. He then asked me the full story and I told him everything. He then said that I was all good and sent me back to my class. This all occurred on Friday. Now, fast forward to Sunday, 8pm. I then see I was blocked for Wikipedia for creating accounts, and I was shocked and didn't know why, since I have forgotten about the situation that happened in my school. I told my friend Jason to also make an unblock report, but I don't think he was serious about it. If you want, I can get my school to contact you guys to prove that I am in no wrong doing. Notimelivelong ( talk) 16:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC) I would also like to note when I was using the computer, I used a VPN to connect to my home. I forgot to mention that. Notimelivelong ( talk) 19:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm declining your unblock request at this time. It's clear that you aren't being honest here; the account User:YesTimeLiveL0ng is very suspicious as good hand-bad hand vandalism even without the two separate checkusers who have matched them to you.
Your protestations simply aren't convincing. CheckUser is based on more than just IP address, and your claim that you were using a VPN (and presumably your "friend" wasn't) simply doesn't make any sense.
Your options are to appeal to ArbCom, as described in the original block notice, or to take some time to think about this and ask to return at some point down the line. ST47 ( talk) 22:44, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() |
Hi Notimelivelong! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 23:30, 1 April 2019 (UTC) |
I deleted the section as no other city in the region has such a section. The city is mentioned in many works of the classics of Russian literature - Pushkin, Lermontov, Tolstoy, Bulgakov, etc. But in this section there is a specific novel that was recently published to me personally by a not known writer. This is just an attempt to promote it via Wikipedia. This is an advertisement.-- DarqaviPalladin ( talk) 23:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Calling a veteran editor a vandal, like you implied in this revert, is a good way to get that editor pissed at you. In addition, if information is not in the source, then don't write it as though it were! Debresser ( talk) 13:47, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
You messaged me some days ago telling me my edits have been reverted because my edit summaries weren't clear, I tried to justify by stating that that a user named Trivialist were doing the same edits by citing WP:CRYSTAL. Recently they have started again to remove the section of films in development (after having that section reverted by other users) so I wanted to see if their justification was valid to remove that section or if that they were doing goes aganist editing guidelines. - Gouleg ( Talk • Contribs) 17:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Please stop blanking the anon's talk page. Per
WP:BLANKING: Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered, from removing comments from their own talk pages...If a user removes material from their user page, it is normally taken to mean that the user has read and is aware of its contents. There is no need to keep them on display, and usually users should not be forced to do so
. Cheers,
——
SerialNumber
54129
18:33, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
PS: welcome to Wikipedia. —— SerialNumber 54129 18:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Not sure what you're up to, but creating PleaseFeckOff ( talk · contribs), DontBlockMeOrElseYouDie ( talk · contribs), and YesTimeLiveL0ng ( talk · contribs) was a bad idea. I'm guessing this is some kind of good hand/bad hand thing where you create obviously inappropriate accounts, report them with your "good" account, and ask for advanced permissions. If I'm wrong, you can appeal the block and give your explanation. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 20:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Notimelivelong ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I never created those accounts! I would never, and I mean EVER, make accounts so that I can report them. I never even filed a report against those accounts or even warned them once. If you look at my contribution history, you will see that all of my reverts are genuine. I spent my own personal time to help prevent vandalism, having fun while doing so, and then getting blocked for accounts I have never created. I have to note that on Thursday (April 4th) and Friday (April 5th), I used my schools internet for vandalism patrolling. I think this may be related to those accounts. The YesTimeLiveL0ng account is possibly related to one of my friends, since he knows about my account and possibly made it to vandalise my user page. Additionally, I have not yet requested for any permissions! I joined Wikipedia around six days ago, and currently, I don't have any reason to request for it. The only thing that I would request for is rollback, so I can use huggle to its fullest extent, but I don't think I can anymore since this block with be tied to my account for as long as Wikipedia exists. This really upsets that I am treated like a person that would actually try to destroy this site. It will also be harder for people to trust me now since I have a block logged on me. Additionally, it is even more upsetting that I am blocked INDEFINETLY, meaning I have the possibility of having this unblock request denied, and I will no longer be able to contribute to this site in my life. Many people even thanked my reverts, even though I am just new to Wikipedia. I even have 400 edits just within a short amount of time of me being part of Wikipedia. Some people did question me for a couple of small mistakes I have made, but they forgave me. Now, I honestly do not know how you tied those accounts to me, but I can assure you that I do not have ill intentions. I can guarantee you that I have not made those accounts and that I will never, ever, ever, EVER, as long as I live, do anything that malicious to ANYTHING. Also, if I DID want to do this, I would make sure that my IP is separated from those accounts. So please clear me from wrong doing. This is just upsetting that I have been practically banned for life from making further contributions for something I never done. These are possibly the last words I will type in a talk page, so please make a very careful decision. Thank for reading, and possibly, goodbye... Notimelivelong ( talk) 00:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser relies on more than just IP addresses. I have also run a checkuser on this account, and I concur with the blocking administrator; the relationship between this account and the named sockpuppets is pretty cut-and-dried. Yunshui 雲 水 07:39, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Notimelivelong ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Alright, I just talked to my friend about this situation. Here's what happened. I got into the library and signed on to Wikipedia. I then started to do my usual thing, patrolling the edit page. Then my two friends walk in and sit down next to me. My friend Anthony sat next to me and my friend Jason (the one who created the accounts) sat down next to Anthony. I started to stop and talk to Anthony and Jason started to make those accounts. Then, Jason asked me what my username was. I told him, and I am guessing he wanted to know to copy my username. I lied to him and I said "YesTimeLiveLong" and then he replaced the "o" with a "0". He then vandalized the Prospect High School website, and told me to look at it, so I did. I then saw the edits that was created and I asked him if he did this, and guess what he said. Times up, he said no. I then reverted the page, and right after I reverted the page, the resource officer walked up behind us and asked what we where doing. He then seperated us and asked me what I was doing. I just said that I was looking at the recent edits on Wikipedia so I can spot vandalism. Then he went to my friend Jason and asked him, and took him to the deens. Next period, the deen came to my classroom and brought me out. He then asked me the full story and I told him everything. He then said that I was all good and sent me back to my class. This all occurred on Friday. Now, fast forward to Sunday, 8pm. I then see I was blocked for Wikipedia for creating accounts, and I was shocked and didn't know why, since I have forgotten about the situation that happened in my school. I told my friend Jason to also make an unblock report, but I don't think he was serious about it. If you want, I can get my school to contact you guys to prove that I am in no wrong doing. Notimelivelong ( talk) 16:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC) I would also like to note when I was using the computer, I used a VPN to connect to my home. I forgot to mention that. Notimelivelong ( talk) 19:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm declining your unblock request at this time. It's clear that you aren't being honest here; the account User:YesTimeLiveL0ng is very suspicious as good hand-bad hand vandalism even without the two separate checkusers who have matched them to you.
Your protestations simply aren't convincing. CheckUser is based on more than just IP address, and your claim that you were using a VPN (and presumably your "friend" wasn't) simply doesn't make any sense.
Your options are to appeal to ArbCom, as described in the original block notice, or to take some time to think about this and ask to return at some point down the line. ST47 ( talk) 22:44, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.